Did Carey Price live up to his 8 year, $84M contract?
- Thread starter SeanMoneyHands
- Start date
Nogatco Rd
Pierre-Luc Dubas
- Apr 3, 2021
- 3,477
- 6,430
Gotcha.. so you agree that he wasn’t really close to living up to his massive contract.
It was never my argument that he wasn’t a franchise level player for portions of his career, I just thought a thread about his performance from 2017-2024 deserved some stats… from 2017-2024
Moose Head
Registered User
BLONG7
Registered User
Great goalie.........the team during his tenure had ONE 80 pt player. The question maybe should be did Bergevin earn his contract during Price's tenure.??
Too many injuries after being rode like a mule.........so the answer is no, he had no way to earn his $$$ because of usage and injuries.
Contracts don't appear out of thin air. I posted the context leading up to Price's contract. This should be obvious to anyone.
The Gr8 Dane
L'harceleur
Not my money not my problem , and the team was so shit with shit management , glad he got his
Nogatco Rd
Pierre-Luc Dubas
- Apr 3, 2021
- 3,477
- 6,430
AfroThunder396
[citation needed]
Someday NHL GMs will learn to give players contracts based on what they will do during that contract, and not for rewarding them based on the play of their previous contract. Everyone knew giving Price that much money for that much term would end up being a disaster and it was. Just like Shesterkin in NYR.
No, he got injured and in hindsight he was not worth it.
However, I’m unclear what other posters are suggesting. Should the habs not have signed him and let him walk or is the assumption that they could have signed him cheaper/shorter? Based on the stats leading up to the contract that seems unlikely.
However, I’m unclear what other posters are suggesting. Should the habs not have signed him and let him walk or is the assumption that they could have signed him cheaper/shorter? Based on the stats leading up to the contract that seems unlikely.
Luigi Lemieux
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2003
- 22,535
- 11,653
He was deserving of it since he was the best goalie in the league at the time. But he didn't live up to it due to injuries. Pretty straightforward.
Doom Bot
Registered User
- Aug 30, 2024
- 77
- 162
I think at some point it's more about market value. It was obvious that the Price contract was going to be exceptionally difficult to be fully lived up to over it's 8 year span, but at that point we were talking about a league MVP winning player who has been carrying a team on his back. Basically one of the most feared players you could go up against in a playoff series. Even a totally broken down Price against the leafs showed that. So to the OPs question I think the answer is an obvious no.
But what was he worth? 9 million? 8? At that point almost any team in the league without an elite goalie would match that money and find a way to fit it in. Montreal was basically forced to give him whatever he wanted at this point. It's just one of the reasons having a goalie carry your team is a precarious position to be in.
Luigi Lemieux
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2003
- 22,535
- 11,653
Sure but it doesn't take place in a vacuum. You have to keep the fans and players happy. They would have been furious if he was traded or let walk as a UFA. Especially after what happened with Roy.
filinski77
Registered User
- Feb 12, 2017
- 2,728
- 4,537
Yes - 100% and without a doubt.
You can't control injuries. That's really unfortunate of course, but ignoring those, at absolutely no point as a Habs fan did I feel his contract wasn't worth it. Quite the contrary.
You can't control injuries. That's really unfortunate of course, but ignoring those, at absolutely no point as a Habs fan did I feel his contract wasn't worth it. Quite the contrary.
Coaches Coroner
Member
- Mar 12, 2009
- 7,519
- 7,795
I don't know, just hope the dude is doing well. He looked pretty rough/medicated that last couple public appearances I saw him at.
You really still think that was on purpose? Yikes
and to answer OP, definitely not and it shouldnt even be a debate
- Feb 10, 2010
- 14,516
- 11,494
IMO if you look at what goalies are tasked with achieving and the scarcity of those achievements, you'll find that consistent excellence is more scarce among goalies than a few great peak seasons.
For that kind of money you want consistently great performances and Carey Price did not achieve that.
For that kind of money you want consistently great performances and Carey Price did not achieve that.
Lafleurs Guy
Guuuuuuuy!
- Jul 20, 2007
- 79,824
- 51,798
Yes.
He was the first 10 mil player to win a playoff series and also the first 10 mil player to win multiple playoff series. He stole multiple playoff series over that timespan and when he was out of the lineup the cap hit didn’t affect the team. Led the club to its first finals in 30 years on a really bad club. Well worth the money.
He was the first 10 mil player to win a playoff series and also the first 10 mil player to win multiple playoff series. He stole multiple playoff series over that timespan and when he was out of the lineup the cap hit didn’t affect the team. Led the club to its first finals in 30 years on a really bad club. Well worth the money.
- Feb 10, 2010
- 14,516
- 11,494
Carey Price is 37th in save % during this contract (minimum 100 games played).
That is not a $10M performance.
That is not a $10M performance.
Ghost of Murph
Registered User
- Dec 23, 2023
- 1,449
- 2,348
Obviously no. He most likely would have had he avoided injuries and Bergevin wasn't riding the short bus during that time frame.
Greatest goalie of a generation. The question is not whether carey ived up to Montreal. The question is whether Montreal lived up to Carey. Alex kovalevs 84 points in his first year were the only time in his entire career he had a ppg player on his team. With the exception of drafting Cole and trading for Nick (a fluke because they targeted Cody class) the past regime absolutely sucked at their jobs and let price down big time.
Mr Positive
Cap Crunch Incoming
- Nov 20, 2013
- 38,462
- 19,407
Yes he was worth it
I look at this in the context of what lesson is there to learn. Does what happened inform GMs to avoid what Montreal suffered through? The answer is no. You pay up for elite talent. Sometimes bad luck happens. Price carried no cap hit while injured and the deal likely was insured to boot.
Elite players are still getting paid, and it's not a bad thing. No GM has come out and said they are parting with their elite player because they want to spread out their cap space more and limit injury risk
I look at this in the context of what lesson is there to learn. Does what happened inform GMs to avoid what Montreal suffered through? The answer is no. You pay up for elite talent. Sometimes bad luck happens. Price carried no cap hit while injured and the deal likely was insured to boot.
Elite players are still getting paid, and it's not a bad thing. No GM has come out and said they are parting with their elite player because they want to spread out their cap space more and limit injury risk
Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 27,215
- 14,290
Those stats have nothing to do with the contract years.
Easy answer to the thread question is no.
