Rumor: Dhaliwal- Boeser to Pens is a real possibility

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

TimmyD

Registered User
Nov 11, 2013
4,981
3,000
Greensburg, PA
From I just saw from a Pittsburgh source there were nothing more than casual/check in conversations on Vancouver's Brock Boeser !! He will not be coming to Pittsburgh..

Pittsburgh sources suck. So if they say Boeser isn’t coming here, he will probably get traded here tomorrow. The guy covering the team a few years ago told everyone that the Penguins weren’t getting Derrick Brassard and that anyone who thought they were must have been a new fan and not understood how the sport works… and then they…got Derrick Brassard, literally the next day
 
  • Like
Reactions: CanuckCity

Frankie Blueberries

Dream Team
Jan 27, 2016
9,414
10,992
How about Boeser + Poolman for Kapanen + Marino? We could do Hamonic as well but he has a modified NMC where he can choose 8 teams to block a trade to, and we know he wants to stay in Western Canada/West Coast so those teams wouldn't be on the list.

Another idea is Boeser + Rathbone for Marino + Dumoulin, but doubt Pittsburgh wants to uproot their defence like that.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
84,431
84,640
Redmond, WA
You think someone would come on HFBoards and just make up that they heard rumors? That's unbelievable!

How about Boeser + Poolman for Kapanen + Marino? We could do Hamonic as well but he has a modified NMC where he can choose 8 teams to block a trade to, and we know he wants to stay in Western Canada/West Coast so those teams wouldn't be on the list.

Another idea is Boeser + Rathbone for Marino + Dumoulin, but doubt Pittsburgh wants to uproot their defence like that.

You're getting greedy with both of these.

Keep it Marino and Kapanen for Boeser and Hamonic/Schenn. Asking for more is getting greedy.
 

nergish

Registered User
Jun 1, 2019
795
891
Pittsburgh should really want Poolman over Hamonic or Schenn, but because he’s overpaid the guy is seen as a leper.

He’s 6’4 and can skate, decent shot. Just not a top 4 D, and makes boneheaded plays sometimes.
 

Gurglesons

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
95,187
76,962
Joshua Tree, CA
last-train-tocool.blogspot.com
Pittsburgh should really want Poolman over Hamonic or Schenn, but because he’s overpaid the guy is seen as a leper.

He’s 6’4 and can skate, decent shot. Just not a top 4 D, and makes boneheaded plays sometimes.

The whole reason of getting rid of Marino is to ease up our cap situation next year and moving forward.

Poolman doesn't do that.
 

Frankie Blueberries

Dream Team
Jan 27, 2016
9,414
10,992
You think someone would come on HFBoards and just make up that they heard rumors? That's unbelievable!



You're getting greedy with both of these.

Keep it Marino and Kapanen for Boeser and Hamonic/Schenn. Asking for more is getting greedy.

I take your point, but I think you're incorrect about the bolded. IMO, Hamonic is the least valuable of the defencemen mentioned. In terms of quality of play + contract, it goes Schenn > Poolman > Hamonic. Poolman has been quite a bit better than Hamonic this season and is $500k cheaper for cap hit. Obviously the downside is Poolman has an additional 2 years on his contract, but at least he provides value that is somewhat close to his cap hit, whereas Hamonic is a liability both on and off the ice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gurglesons

48MPHSlapShot

Registered User
Nov 3, 2018
695
850
How about Boeser + Poolman for Kapanen + Marino? We could do Hamonic as well but he has a modified NMC where he can choose 8 teams to block a trade to, and we know he wants to stay in Western Canada/West Coast so those teams wouldn't be on the list.

Another idea is Boeser + Rathbone for Marino + Dumoulin, but doubt Pittsburgh wants to uproot their defence like that.

If we could ship Poolman out with Boeser for Marino and Kap I'd drive both of them to the airport myself.
 

48MPHSlapShot

Registered User
Nov 3, 2018
695
850
This is a great comparison! I hadn’t thought of it but so true.
Sbisa was pretty decent in his last year with us. Nothing to write home about, but defensive play tightened up and you gotta like his physicality. If Poolman had the physicality of Sbisa he might not be a pure cap dump.
 

Bettman Returnz

Why so serious?
Jul 28, 2003
4,788
2,675
BC
Visit site
Sbisa was pretty decent in his last year with us. Nothing to write home about, but defensive play tightened up and you gotta like his physicality. If Poolman had the physicality of Sbisa he might not be a pure cap dump.
True sbisa played a better physical game… but that aside they encompass similar traits and an annoying contract you’d be fine to punt!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 48MPHSlapShot

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad