I don't think I can properly paraphrase what they're saying mainly 'cause one of the guys cellphone connection is ASS.
From what I'm understanding here, their viewpoint is that Shane is more of a sure thing and Slaf isn't.....because of exposure(?)
Meaning (in my opinion) no one truly has seen what Slaf is capable of whereas Shane has had his game picked apart here.
The person the host had on his show brought up his poor numbers in Liga but the Host later on mentioned a scenario involving Lucas Raymond where he didn't have good numbers and then once he was with NHL Players who could "Think the game like he could", his game elevated to another level.
And that makes sense to me. I saw Slaf make many plays to teammates who just couldn't finish (he'd fit right in with us.. just kidding....maybe...) and I feel he will excel when he has teammates to set up in the NHL.
They also said the same about Cooley (in regards to exposure) in how because he's got tape on him because he's in the states.
Also discussed was the D-men in Nemec/Jiricek....basically the only thing I got from that discussion was "Whomever you select is basically a personal preference".
That's the best I can do,
@StevenToddIves and I'm sure you'll get a much better rundown by someone else that listened to the show.