Prospect Info: Devils Win #2 Overall -- Slafkovsky vs. Jiricek vs. Nemec

What should we do with #2?

  • Slafkovsky

    Votes: 220 61.5%
  • Jiricek

    Votes: 56 15.6%
  • Nemec

    Votes: 30 8.4%
  • Trade it

    Votes: 39 10.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 13 3.6%

  • Total voters
    358
Status
Not open for further replies.

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,701
30,526
Are you really being objective comparing players who are 3+ years apart in age?
There are 3 rookies in front of him in goals, two are from his draft class (2020), drafted after him, the other is from the year before (2019) his draft, taken at the bottom of the first round. Those are his peers.

In points he is the 9th AHL Rookie with 3 others from his draft class in front of him. .all drafted after him.

There was nothing "special" about his season. Certainly it was a very good season. But when talk like "2nd best all-time" or "you have to have a very good shot to score that many goals* happens..... it's nonsense.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mdj12784

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,675
50,599
Are you really being objective comparing players who are 3+ years apart in age?

You’re looking in the wrong place. You want “objective”, go buy some telescope lens or something.


It’s official, magically instantly agreed upon “extensions” make everyone worth the 2OA, even injury riddled wingers who turn 34 in November.
 

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,719
38,282
There are 3 players in front of him in goals, two are from his draft class taken after him the other is the year before take at the bottom of the first round. Those are his peers.

In points he is the 9th Rookie with 3 others from his draft class in front of him. .all drafted after him.

There was nothing special about his season. Certainly it was a very good season. But when talk like "2nd best all-time" or "you have to have a very good shot to score that many goals* happens..... it's nonsense.
Out of the 3 players in front of him in goals, only 1 objectively had a better season goalscoring wise and that's Quinn. He had a real good season.

Pelletier had 1 more goal in 14 more games than Holtz.
Peterka had 2 more goals in 18 more games than Holtz.

Don't you think that with the same amount of games as those guys, Holtz would've ended up #1 in rookie goals this season? I don't think that's unreasonable.



In the PPG category, Holtz had the 4th best PPG in the rookie top 9 you point out.

For example, Rossi had 1 more point than him, so he's in front in the rankings, but he had 11 more games played than Holtz this season.

Reichel had 6 more points in 4 more games, they have a very similar PPG on the season. Other than Quinn and an older Maccelli (never heard of him before, intriguing one), I don't see how anyone had that much of a better season than Holtz.
 

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,675
50,599
I seen this as well, and something needs to be said about mentality. Puljujarvi’s struggles were very public. I am sure blame can be spread to both management and the player. Plus, playing in the Edmonton bubble probably didn’t help. It can be the media but Puljujarvi’s reaction to adversity was less than stellar.

Slaf left his home years ago to chase his dream and to improve. Slaf struggled this season but his play kept him in the top 10 conversation and once he broke out, he hasn’t looked back.

Puljujärvi had knee surgery in May 2016 which impacted the start of his rookie season.

He had a congenital (?) hip problem that led to double hip surgery in February 2019.

His player development path was pretty rough, he’s only played 259 NHL regular season games.

Puljujärvi selling point was his speed (for a big man), he didn’t always do the best things but he did move fast. It was his speed plus size that people found so tantalizing.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,701
30,526
Out of the 3 players in front of him in goals, only 1 objectively had a better season goalscoring wise and that's Quinn. He had a real good season.

Pelletier had 1 more goal in 14 more games than Holtz.
Peterka had 2 more goals in 18 more games than Holtz.

Don't you think that with the same amount of games as those guys, Holtz would've ended up #1 in rookie goals this season? I don't think that's unreasonable.



In the PPG category, Holtz had the 4th best PPG in the rookie top 9 you point out.

For example, Rossi had 1 more point than him, so he's in front in the rankings, but he had 11 more games played than him this season.

Reichel had 6 more points in 4 more games, they have a very similar PPG on the season. Other than Quinn and an older Maccelli (never heard of him before, intriguing one), I don't see how anyone had that much of a better season than Holtz.
No, none of the prominent 2020's had much better or worse seasons than each other ...

That is precisely my point. He performed just like his peers did
 

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,675
50,599
Out of the 3 players in front of him in goals, only 1 objectively had a better season goalscoring wise and that's Quinn. He had a real good season.

Pelletier had 1 more goal in 14 more games than Holtz.
Peterka had 2 more goals in 18 more games than Holtz.

Don't you think that with the same amount of games as those guys, Holtz would've ended up #1 in rookie goals this season? I don't think that's unreasonable.



In the PPG category, Holtz had the 4th best PPG in the rookie top 9 you point out.

For example, Rossi had 1 more point than him, so he's in front in the rankings, but he had 11 more games played than him this season.

Reichel had 6 more points in 4 more games, they have a very similar PPG on the season. Other than Quinn and an older Maccelli (never heard of him before, intriguing one), I don't see how anyone had that much of a better season than Holtz.

95DDD32C-940C-468B-BA57-2BBA7C16F126.gif
 

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,719
38,282
No, none of the prominent 2020's had much better or worse seasons than each other ...

That is precisely my point. He performed just like his peers did
Yes, I agree he performed very similarly to his peers, but maybe those performances were really good for him and his peers by AHL history standards. Reichel, Holtz and Peterka had the 5th, 7th and 8th best PPG 19 year old seasons in AHL history respectively. To me, that's impressive.

There's some pretty good company under them also, including Bergeron, Vrana, Elias, F. Forsberg, Okposo, Fiala, Kapanen, J.T Miller, Zibanejad, etc.

Now sure, there's a difference across eras and years, but, that to me, represents a very good season for Alex, I don't really care about what the other guys did (even though they did perform very well). You see that differently though and that's fine, it gave me the opportunity to read up on that Maccelli kid, intriguing prospect for sure! :D
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,701
30,526
Yes, I agree he performed very similarly to his peers, but maybe those performances were really good for him and his peers by AHL history standards. Reichel, Holtz and Peterka had the 5th, 7th and 8th best PPG 19 year old seasons in AHL history respectively. To me, that's impressive.

There's some pretty good company under them also, including Bergeron, Vrana, Elias, F. Forsberg, Okposo, Fiala, Kapanen, J.T Miller, Zibanejad, etc.

Now sure, there's a difference across eras and years, but, that to me, represents a very good season for Alex, I don't really care about what the other guys did (even though they did perform very well). You see that differently though and that's fine, it gave me the opportunity to read up on that Maccelli kid, intriguing prospect for sure! :D
Can we just stop with the best in AHL history stuff. It really is stupid... that's what I have been taking exception to.

It's like saying Billy Madison has the best car of any 3rd grader.
 

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,675
50,599
You better have immediately unfollowed that account after seeing that crap
I assume “Insane Fan Trades” collects the worst trades on Twitter, of which there are endless supply of.

JFresh, for some unknown reason, asked for trade proposals (I think it was during the last TDL) and they were all impossibly awful. And he had to nicely reply, and explain in non-mocking way, why they were all bad lol. (I mean, he didn’t have to, but he’s Canadian.)
 

Captain3rdLine

Registered User
Sep 24, 2020
7,616
8,857
I assume “Insane Fan Trades” collects the worst trades on Twitter, of which there are endless supply of.

JFresh, for some unknown reason, asked for trade proposals (I think it was during the last TDL) and they were all impossibly awful. And he had to nicely reply, and explain in non-mocking way, why they were all bad lol. (I mean, he didn’t have to, but he’s Canadian.)
Most of the insane fan trades are 2nd overall proposals from Canucks and Hand fans.







 

Saugus

Ecrasez l'infame!
Sponsor
Jun 17, 2009
105,775
13,939
Connecticut
Between these insane Habs fan Twitter proposals (that are somehow even worse than those on the trade board here at HF), and the random drop-in accounts or online writers with "sources" who tell us what Devils and/or Habs management are supposedly planning to do, I really can't wait for the draft to get here yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guttersniped

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,719
38,282
Between these insane Habs fan Twitter proposals (that are somehow even worse than those on the trade board here at HF), and the random drop-in accounts or online writers with "sources" who tell us what Devils and/or Habs management are supposedly planning to do, I really can't wait for the draft to get here yet.
Officially 1 month from now... should get here pretty quick.
 

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
Between these insane Habs fan Twitter proposals (that are somehow even worse than those on the trade board here at HF), and the random drop-in accounts or online writers with "sources" who tell us what Devils and/or Habs management are supposedly planning to do, I really can't wait for the draft to get here yet.
I’m sure NJ will be happy to take Josh Anderson a second and a C+ prosect for the second overall. Who wouldn’t want that?
 

glenwo2

JESPER BRATWURST
Oct 18, 2008
52,505
25,003
New Jersey(No Fanz!)
According to sources, the Devils are leaning towards one of Jiricek or Slafkovsky. Don't be shocked if it's Big Dave,
Most of us will be if it's Dave.

C'mon now...

BTW, my sources (which consist of the neighborhood dog, the mailman, and the cashier from the local grocery store) say the Devils are leaning towards Slaf and ONLY Slaf.

See? I got "sources", too. :p:

(what that all means? It means you have no sources. Only opinions like the rest of us on who the Devils select)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captain3rdLine

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
34,929
35,484
NJ
The closer we get the more I’ve slowly shifted towards Cooley over Jiricek. Probably still go Jiricek but it’s close to even. It’s one of those 2 for me
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad