Andre Palot
Registered User
I was 34 20 years ago
I remember bitching and complaining about us having Dean McAmmond back like over a decade ago because he was 'too old' and was 33 when we got him.
I'm 35 now lmfao
I was 34 20 years ago
Dougie is going nowhere. Has a NMC and submits a 10 team trade list starting 2025-26. Going to be very difficult to trade his last few seasons.
I agree with you there for sure, which I why I did not want to swap Marino for Pesce.Fair, it's not an issue right now but once Nemec becomes fully developed imo. Having 14M+ in Pesce and Hamliton is gonna hurt I feel
Dean McAmmond was actually even older than that when we got him. He was 36.I remember bitching and complaining about us having Dean McAmmond back like over a decade ago because he was 'too old' and was 33 when we got him.
I'm 35 now lmfao
I remember when EDM said they had really strong evidence that Kris Russell was one of the top breakout passers in the NHL. Management groups can make mistakes, or mistakenly believe something.2.5 year difference. Pesce has a down but still better year than Marino and he’s “already declining”. And Marino has a disaster year and will rebound?
I’m not even in love with this potential swap but that just seems like a bit much. I really don’t think management bothers doing all this unless they have some really strong evidence that the fit is much better for what they’re trying to do.
Why? Marino was great in the 2022-23 playoffs for them. It's kind of a bizarre thing to suddenly believe.I don't have any faith in Marino come playoff time, so I'm fine moving on there. Pesce is much more battle tested under the bright lights. We'll be better off for sure if we can get him locked down.
I remember bitching and complaining about us having Dean McAmmond back like over a decade ago because he was 'too old' and was 33 when we got him.
I'm 35 now lmfao
My oldest son would likely be negotiating his UFA deal this season. Try being that old.You have to wonder why two franchises have given up on Marino now.
For me, it's when @Bleedred does his oldest NHL players lists.
Makes me feel old as f*** when I would now be in the top 10.
Two completely different defensmen. Only similar in how they slot on the depth charts.Whatever but it seems more like lateral move for a worse contract.
I don't see the point honestly.
You have to wonder why two franchises have given up on Marino now.
I trust them. And Pesce is better than Marino offensively on most public models.I remember when EDM said they had really strong evidence that Kris Russell was one of the top breakout passers in the NHL. Management groups can make mistakes, or mistakenly believe something.
I think Pesce will be solid in his first couple seasons in NJ. But Canes fans have already noticed a decline in mobility, and he isn't the fastest guy to begin with. I am very concerned with having two very expensive defensemen in their 30s (the other being Dougie), who are already not the fleetest of foot, and have some already visible risk factors. If the mobility on either or both of them ticks down further, they could become albatrosses pretty quickly.
Yes. 2.5 years is a big difference when dealing with NHLers entering the back halves of their careers.
Marino in 2022-23 was absolutely sublime. If that version were to return, that is the superior player - and one that is younger and cheaper. I'd rather bank on that.
A bigger issue is that I'm seeing Keefe have a pretty big influence on the roster construction - these are the types of moves he publicly and privately lobbied Dubas to make. It ended up with the Leafs becoming anemic offensively, despite the weapons at his disposal. I don't want the Devils to go that way.
Bunch of AGE-ISTS around here. Im 34, I bet you all think I should be in a nursing home.
Even if we get Dillon / Pesce I'm not sure if we are significantly better, and what happens if one guy goes down?