StevenToddIves
Registered User
The Luke Hughes revisionism is silly and not worth responding to. In a 2021 re-draft, it's between Hughes and Power for 1st overall. If Hughes were born a couple weeks later, he'd be battling Shane Wright for #1 overall this year.And many wouldn't. To suggest that it was a nepotism pick is just being recalcitrant. He is no worse a pick than Edvinsson from everything I've read. If nepotism was used as a tie breaker so be it. I don't see anyone saying anything but good things about Luke's play at Michigan. He was one of the youngest players in the NCAA and a Hobey Baker finalist. He apparently scored at a rate that set a record or two for something. What's Edvinsson done better? Score 2 goals "against men"? Meh. Maybe Edvinsson is better long term or maybe not, right now show me anyone specifically calling for Edvinsson to clearly go ahead of Hughes in a re-draft and I'll show you a Red Wings fan.
No way to be perfect at this, but I'd say this would be a 2021 re-draft at the top:
1 Power
2 Hughes
3 Beniers
4 McTavish
5 Edvinsson
6 Geunther
7 Sillinger
8 Johnson
9 Morrow
10 L'Heureux
Eklund's probably in the 11/12 range, and we should keep in mind how many people on here wanted him to be the Devils pick. But saying Edvinsson is better than Hughes right now is silly. Edvinsson had a very, very good year in the SHL, but Hughes may have had the best offensive campaign for a freshman defender in NCAA history.
The Devils have to be thrilled with the pick of Luke Hughes, and if this draft was done over again, NJ would have had no chance for him at #4. If the Devils made an easily identifiable mistake, it was not taking RD Scott Morrow at #29.