100% making the playoffs.
A good chance of making it to the 2nd round.
After that? not so good. lol
So .... Carolina has almost 2x the chance of winning the Cup as Boston? And Edmonton 13.5? WTF? Am I seeing this wrong?
100% making the playoffs.
A good chance of making it to the 2nd round.
After that? not so good. lol
Yeah....Edmonton having a large percentage is what's baffling.So .... Carolina has almost 2x the chance of winning the Cup as Boston? And Edmonton 13.5? WTF? Am I seeing this wrong?
Not really when you look at the West overall.Yeah....Edmonton having a large percentage is what's baffling.
Their goaltending is very crappy so I don't get it.
Well Oilers are in the west. Think about how hard it is for Boston to make SCF:So .... Carolina has almost 2x the chance of winning the Cup as Boston? And Edmonton 13.5? WTF? Am I seeing this wrong?
That is basically it. His Power Rankings rely on Expected Goal % at ES. as a key factor If you sort his Power Rankings page by that column you will see that.Well Oilers are in the west. Think about how hard it is for Boston to make SCF:
1st Rd - [Penguins] - an experienced veteran team (kinda a Boston mirror)
2nd Rd - NYR/Leafs or Tampa
3rd Rd Carolina/Devils or one of the above
Especially in rounds 2 and 3 Boston has to go through two much tougher series than anything in the west.
Odds would be so much higher for NJD if we were in the west. Would be such an "easy" route to WCF and to SCF.
Dunno why the chart picked Oilers as the team, but anyway, there are only 2-3 teams with SCF potential in the west. East has like 6.
Bahl would not really be replacing Graves. With Luke coming in the roles on the left get reshuffled pretty dramatically.I don't want Bahl out of the lineup for Smith the rest of the way.
We need to know if Bahl can eventually replace Graves.
Bahl would not really be replacing Graves. With Luke coming in the roles on the left get reshuffled pretty dramatically.
We are also now at the point of securing a playoff spot, and then trying to win in the playoffs. If Bahl is not in the lineup through the rest of the year, then so be it.
Now assuming he get's sqeezed out of the mix this year, could he improve in coming years to grow into a 3rd pairing guy who can contribute in defensive roles, it's certainly possible, Sieg's didn't establish himself until his 24 year old season, so I don't think this stretch is overly important in terms of deciding on where Bahl fits going fwd.
I get the importance of ES play, but I don't understand why one would overlook the importance of goal tending and special teams.That is basically it. His Power Rankings rely on Expected Goal % at ES. as a key factor If you sort his Power Rankings page by that column you will see that.
His model is really geared towards bettors that are looking for "value" bets as opposed to showing why a team like Boston is winning.
NHL Power Rankings -MoneyPuck NHL Power Rankings
NHL Power Rankings Driven By Analyticswww.moneypuck.com
It is just a model. If you understand what it is attempting to do you understand its weaknesses.I get the importance of ES play, but I don't understand why one would overlook the importance of goal tending and special teams.
Also pretty interesting how Boston outperforms their xGF at ES. Of the 14 fwd's who have played 100 minutes, all but one guy has a better GF then xGF. Often the outperformance is pretty dramatic.
Pretty likely? I dunno sounds pretty unlikely to me.I think it is pretty likely we resign Graves and Hughes will play his offside next year and we go with the following:
Siegenthaler-Hamilton
Graves-Hughes
Bahl-Marino
Or
Siegenthaler-Hamilton
Hughes-Marino
Graves-Bahl
Then the year after when Nemec is truly ready a decision gets made as to whether you move out Graves or Bahl (likely Graves due to contracts)
I don't know what actually goes into the model, so I'm just assuming here, but a model which doesn't factor in special teams or goaltending? Never mind 5v5 finishing ability.It is just a model. If you understand what it is attempting to do you understand its weaknesses.
Bahl would not really be replacing Graves. With Luke coming in the roles on the left get reshuffled pretty dramatically.
We are also now at the point of securing a playoff spot, and then trying to win in the playoffs. If Bahl is not in the lineup through the rest of the year, then so be it.
Now assuming he get's sqeezed out of the mix this year, could he improve in coming years to grow into a 3rd pairing guy who can contribute in defensive roles, it's certainly possible, Sieg's didn't establish himself until his 24 year old season, so I don't think this stretch is overly important in terms of deciding on where Bahl fits going fwd.
Sounds like you would prefer a comprehensive model that explains why teams are winning. I am sure they are out there.I don't know what actually goes into the model, so I'm just assuming here, but a model which doesn't factor in special teams or goaltending? Never mind 5v5 finishing ability.
It's telling 1/3 of the story.
I wouldn’t be so sure we don’t see Luke.In my opinion Luke is not a factor when talking about this regular season.
Good chance we don't see Luke at all this season or at the very best a couple of games. The NCAA regionals don't start until March 24th and the Frozen 4 starts on April 6th. We only have 7 games in April, only 4 games after April 6. If Michigan reaches the Frozen 4 there is no way we see Luke.
Next year we can assume Luke is going to start in the top 4. Something like:
Siegenthaler - Hamilton
Luke - Marino
So that leaves:
Bahl/Graves? - Nemec/Severson?
In my mind the Graves slot heir apparent right now is Bahl, similarly Nemec to Severson.
So with a decision to be made on both Graves and Severson. My opinion is getting Bahl as many reps as possible is a smart thing to do.
Luke will almost certainly start his career at LD. He may switch over at some point but I don't think it'll be any time soon.
He's also played LD all year this year.
I didn't say we won't see Luke. I said he's a non-factor as far as the regular season is concerned.I wouldn’t be so sure we don’t see Luke.
Michigan almost choked away a 4-1 lead last night, it’s very possible they lose the semi-final game on March 11th.
Even if they go right away, he’ll most likely come along for the last 2 games of our regular season on April 11th and April 14th, whether that is to get his cup of coffee, give some guys rest or slot into the lineup for the playoffs.
In what way? I’m pretty sure he suits up for the last 2 games (considering the go all the way in the Frozen Four) to at least give guys some rest. Unless you mean that 2 games isn’t a huge factor for the team structure?I didn't say we won't see Luke. I said he's a non-factor as far as the regular season is concerned.
Let's assume he suits up for 4 games...there is still 17 games he won't be the lineup.In what way? I’m pretty sure he suits up for the last 2 games (considering the go all the way in the Frozen Four) to at least give guys some rest. Unless you mean that 2 games isn’t a huge factor for the team structure?
Given we are talking about Bahl potentially replacing Graves, are we not talking next year?In my opinion Luke is not a factor when talking about this regular season.
Good chance we don't see Luke at all this season or at the very best a couple of games. The NCAA regionals don't start until March 24th and the Frozen 4 starts on April 6th. We only have 7 games in April, only 4 games after April 6. If Michigan reaches the Frozen 4 there is no way we see Luke.
Next year we can assume Luke is going to start in the top 4. Something like:
Siegenthaler - Hamilton
Luke - Marino
So that leaves:
Bahl/Graves? - Nemec/Severson?
In my mind the Graves slot heir apparent right now is Bahl, similarly Nemec to Severson.
So with a decision to be made on both Graves and Severson. My opinion is getting Bahl as many reps as possible is a smart thing to do.
Luke will almost certainly start his career at LD. He may switch over at some point but I don't think it'll be any time soon.
He's also played LD all year this year.
Lets assume the current standing in east are the actual seeding for POs.
100% making the playoffs.
A good chance of making it to the 2nd round.
After that? not so good. lol
I don't know what actually goes into the model, so I'm just assuming here, but a model which doesn't factor in special teams or goaltending? Never mind 5v5 finishing ability.
It's telling 1/3 of the story.
Meh, I'd rather not seperate myself from the pack.MoneyPuck.com -About and How it Works
About MoneyPuck, Models, Analytics, Corsi, Fenwickmoneypuck.com
They have a page explaining the model, you can read about it yourself instead of trying to imagine it from an off-hand comment here. (Save % and Shooting % is in the model btw.)
Graves is having a pretty good year. I doubt we are going to give him anything close to what he's going to get on the open market.I think it is pretty likely we resign Graves and Hughes will play his offside next year and we go with the following:
Siegenthaler-Hamilton
Graves-Hughes
Bahl-Marino
Or
Siegenthaler-Hamilton
Hughes-Marino
Graves-Bahl
Then the year after when Nemec is truly ready a decision gets made as to whether you move out Graves or Bahl (likely Graves due to contracts).
Ya, especially when the plan should be a Luke Hughes-Sieg top 4 on the left side within 2 seasons.Graves is having a pretty good year. I doubt we are going to give him anything close to what he's going to get on the open market.