JrFischer54
Registered User
- Apr 4, 2017
- 10,872
- 4,475
I agree that people exaggerate cap implications often, but that's not the case in this particular hypothetical. If the Devils are in a spot where they have to pony up money for a Mercer replacement but don't have the cap space, whose salary are they shedding to make room? It's not like we have many bad contracts that we could dispose of without making the team worse.
Acquiring another Mercer who is cost controlled isn't going to happen, it doesn't matter how good our prospect pool is. Those kinds of trades don't happen, and for good reason. You're making it seem like it's easy peasy to do this kind of stuff without any evidence that it's realistic.
Why do you need an exact number? Mercer will be a better value than a vet, that's pretty much a given because he's an RFA for several more years. Stop trying to make it seem like you have some gotcha on this, you don't.
well because it matters thats why. i mean you can't really complain about the cap and then say why do i need an exact number?how am i suppose to know how much money we have to spend if i cant get a figure on mercers next deal? so you can't even guess what he will be making coming off a hypothetical 20-50 season? its not about a gotcha