Zajacs Bowl Cut
Lets Go Baby
Last I checked we are halfway through the season and he has 8 goals and 17 points. But I know you can't read.
Miles Wood 2 goals in his last 34 games played. Sorry, a LITTLE LESS than half the season.
Last I checked we are halfway through the season and he has 8 goals and 17 points. But I know you can't read.
Either that or a coach gets the team to play well enough to make your average eg Nedjelkovic goaltender look great.Simplify the Jack Adams trophy and consider it as success on some level, whether it's "surprise success" or "outright success." That's the only point. You need good goaltending to get somewhere.
Or you could also look at cup and conference finalists and how many of them are Vezina winners or, expanding out to include guys like Bishop/Lehner, how many are runners up. You cover way more than the lion's share of those appearances with just two criteria: Vezina winner or runner up. Few exceptions include Bobrovsky and Kuemper, and the latter posted a .921 when he won it all.
Mercer, Sharangovich, Tatar: 3g in the last 20Miles Wood 2 goals in his last 34 games played. Sorry, a LITTLE LESS than half the season.
It’s far from certain. NRD who is very good with this stuff said that talks haven’t really moved on Meier yet, it’s just preliminary kicking tires. He also confirmed the Devils have checked in on Horvat and Kane, but talks haven’t progressed anywhere yet. This place is going to meltdown when Buffalo gets Meier.
Mercer, Sharangovich, Tatar: 3g in the last 20
Boqvist, Haula, Bastian: 2g in the past 20
Zetterlund, Mcleod: 1g in his last 20.
So that's pretty much the bottom 9 not scoring.
Don't think it's a unique Wood problem, but continue with your bias.
Mercer, Sharangovich, Tatar: 3g in the last 20
Boqvist, Haula, Bastian: 2g in the past 20
Zetterlund, Mcleod: 1g in his last 20.
So that's pretty much the bottom 9 not scoring.
Don't think it's a unique Wood problem, but continue with your bias.
Nice job shifting the goal posts to “bubble team”.
Yes it was good goaktending. He gave up one goal. And that goal was a 5 on 3 against. Haula assaulted him and the puck went it as well. I fail to see that as a goal thr Vitek could do anything about. Stop slicing the baloney unfairly. He saved 33 of 35. If he gives up 3 on 35 they don’t get to OT. So in my view Vitek’s good goaltending gave them a chance to score thr timely goal. Both were necessary to win. Hardly a controversial position. You can disagree with me on this but let’s talk about that island.Vitek was down 2-0 on 18 shots after the first period. They trailed from 10:50 of the first period to 3:55 of the second period in the Dallas game. They trailed for a little more than 13 minutes of 60+ minute game. With Vitek saving 89% of the shots in the first period...that's good goaltending?
Jack getting the 3rd goal of the game early in the second and Wood following up shortly after was way important than 89% saves.
Size, speed, physicality. Pretty much exactly what any playoff team is looking for.is there a difference between 20 games, and 34?
also, what does Miles Wood bring, exactly?
Vitek was down 2-0 on 18 shots after the first period. They trailed from 10:50 of the first period to 3:55 of the second period in the Dallas game. They trailed for a little more than 13 minutes of 60+ minute game. With Vitek saving 89% of the shots in the first period...that's good goaltending?
Jack getting the 3rd goal of the game early in the second and Wood following up shortly after was way important than 89% saves.
We might be just about leading the league in come from behind wins at that, however. I’d rather see us go down a goal in the 1st these days than go up, LoL.I 100% unequivocally disagree with that.
Goals scoring helps defense, more specifically playing with a lead helps defense...no question about it. The numbers show this over and over trailing after 2 is a bleak outlook in the NHL. Trailing after 1 period is not a whole helluva lot better. Playing with a lead is simply easier.
We fell down a bit since October and November but we are STILL 10th in the league in Time with a lead. Last year we were 28th. We never played with a lead last season. If you don't believe that doesn't effect GAA you're nuts.
That's a small sample size and doesn't take into account the difficulty of saves. The difference between great goaltending, average goaltending, and poor goaltending is razor thin in most cases.
He had a slightly below average 1st and was perfect the 2nd and 3rd periods which gave him a great S% for the game.
He is not good defensively and probably takes too many penalties. It amazes me that he still gets PP2 time. Hopefully they replace Bastian or someone else from his spot - he has no hands and should not be there IMO.is there a difference between 20 games, and 34?
also, what does Miles Wood bring, exactly?
To help in their Bedard efforts /sI don’t know why a rebuilding team would want a shitty 27 year old on an expiring contract
These other players contribute in other ways when not scoring.Mercer, Sharangovich, Tatar: 3g in the last 20
Boqvist, Haula, Bastian: 2g in the past 20
Zetterlund, Mcleod: 1g in his last 20.
So that's pretty much the bottom 9 not scoring.
Don't think it's a unique Wood problem, but continue with your bias.
He hasn't been great since Romanov hit him. That said, he has had more games than not where he's taken a stretch pass and has at least gotten a chance or made a rush up the ice. He's been in front on the PP and hasn't done much but provide a screen. He's made a couple of hits (hitting someone who had asked Okh to go last game). He and the fourth line have been more down than up but without them I think we are alot easier team to play against.when is the last time Wood used his size and physicality?
Saying any of those guys outside of Mercer contribute more intangibles than Wood is pretty silly. Tatar is making space for other players?These other players contribute in other ways when not scoring.
Wood is a one man show so when he isn’t producing he is contributing squat. Hence the hyper focus on him compared to the others.
Edit: @Triumph beat me to it. I should read before responding
Saying any of those guys outside of Mercer contribute more intangibles than Wood is pretty silly. Tatar is making space for other players?
Rango on the PK if l is ok, but his turnovers have been horrible, and he's been strapped to bottom lines for it.
I'll give you McLeod for faceoffs
The coaching staff disagrees with you. As Lindy made clear when Z came in for Boqvist.... And miles Wood scored...
Saying any of those guys outside of Mercer contribute more intangibles than Wood is pretty silly. Tatar is making space for other players?
Rango on the PK if l is ok, but his turnovers have been horrible, and he's been strapped to bottom lines for it.
I'll give you McLeod for faceoffs
The coaching staff disagrees with you. As Lindy made clear when Z came in for Boqvist.... And miles Wood scored...
Agree. Except the conversation is about perceived value to GMs acquiring Wood.Tatar is actually a top 6 forward this year by every metric, the one place he doesn't belong is the PP1 and they clearly have no one to use in that bumper spot. It's why making a move for Horvat or Meier make a ton of sense, especially the latter. Sharangovich is a very good PKer. Wood is completely useless if he's not scoring 5v5, I don't even want to mention how bad he is on the powerplay. Guy is dangling on the boards most times when he should be at the net front with little to no puck handling on PP2.
And multiple things can be true. What you say is true, and so is: nobody else is scoring, and:I said this the other day, but not every player needs defending. Its okay to say a player sucks.
Miles Wood has by and large sucked for the better part of 3 months now. End of story.
Agree. Except the conversation is about perceived value to GMs acquiring Wood.
I'm not arguing the guy is good.
I'm arguing big, fast fourth line power forward who fights a little and could score twenty goals makes GMs giddy to the point that they would rather have him than a $5m guy they would scratch in a playoff game.
And if the counter is: 'wah he isn't scoring', the answer is that one or two goals tomorrow vaults him over our entire bottom 9 for the past few months. Nobody is scoring outside the top three guys.
This isn't what he said. He said if the Devils whiff on their winger targets he can see them falling back to a guy like Ekholm to shore up the defense. Provided that the Devils 7th defenseman options are Bahl and Okhotiuk right now, I can guarantee you they'll be bringing in some form of veteran presence on defense regardless.NRD’s podcast also claimed that Fitz was more interested in “shoring up the defense” with someone like Matthias Ekholm, which shows they make stuff up and aren’t very good at it, considering a $6 million 32 year old defenseman is the last thing the Devils want or need.
That's true. But it cuts both ways. If the guy could play a lick of defense he could be getting a Tom Wilson or Ryan Hartman or David Clarkson treatment. He's been strapped to McLeod largely bc of his own defensive play but also bc the Hughes line needs Haula for faceoffs and D.Miles Wood also has an uncanny knack of taking the stupid penalties which could also drown a team in the playoffs too though lol. The guy isn't good enough to care about to this extent. And I agree about our bottom 6 being atrocious lately but he's arguably the one constant along with McLeod, a ton of our guys have moved up and down the lineup losing chemistry with guys from a game to game basis where Wood has mostly stayed with his center that he had a great start with in the beginning of the year.