Setec Astronomy
Registered User
- Jun 15, 2012
- 2,626
- 1,786
While I completely understand and agree with the notion of "innocent til proven guilty" silence is worse for McLeod. You would think if he was innocent or not involved he or his agent/lawyer would be screaming that from the mountain tops.
There's 2 people left on the team that haven't made a statement and 8 were allegedly directly involved.
Others have made statements that they weren't at the event or even in the province at the time. Easily proven wrong if lying... so I believe them. It's up to him to prove his innocence and he proves he belongs on this team. With continued silence, there will be questions and distractions continually. An average fourth liner is not worth that especially when he's easily replaceable by signing/trade/system.
The only thing that we know for sure right now is that the accuser brought a lawsuit, chose not to pursue claims and discovery against the individuals she was accusing and ultimately settled with Hockey Canada. The inference you can make from McCleod's silence at this point is that he had an encounter of some sort with the accuser, which can run the gamut of being an observer of something, boorish but not illegal behavior, consensual or nonconsensual sexual acts.
Given that the people who primarily get to shape the narrative (sports journalists and Canadian politicians) have assumed guilt, McLeod or any of the other players should not be commenting unless they can prove they were somewhere else. If I were the Devils, I would be fair to my employee, and not take any disciplinary action until, at the very least, I actually knew something beyond what's being reported in the press.