Devils team discussion (news, notes and speculation) - offseason part II

Status
Not open for further replies.

ninetyeight

Registered User
Jun 3, 2007
2,090
3,121
Finland
What's the alternative? Having Zacha here look awesome for 2 weeks before going 20-30 games without scoring? Watching him skate his big ass around without bothering to hit someone? There is absolutely nothing that Haula can or can't do to make me miss Zacha.

The alternative would have been either getting another young struggling prospect or a 2nd round pick. 31 year old injury prone player who was terrible in a more defensive 3rd line role, doesn't really excite me much. Maybe Haula is excellent for us, but I can only go with what I've seen and read and seems like the best days are behind him.
 

MauDevils

Registered User
Jan 11, 2009
15,635
10,856
New Jersey
So basically, if Bratt signs a 1 year deal, he’s still an RFA after next season. So at worst, he signs a 1 year deal next summer as well. We have him for 2 years at a minimum.

Do we feel confident in the chances of signing him to a long-term contract next off-season if he signs a 1 year deal this summer, with more cap and big contracts coming off the board next off-season?
If it's a one year deal he's gone. You have to trade him immediately. If you try again next year you risk trading him as a pure rental for a terrible return that will set us back years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devs3cups

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,721
38,294
If it's a one year deal he's gone. You have to trade him immediately. If you try again next year you risk trading him as a pure rental for a terrible return that will set us back years.
While I agree, I could see Fitz trying again. He’s a rational GM though, he’d most likely move him for a top-6 forward that would help us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eggtimer

ninetyeight

Registered User
Jun 3, 2007
2,090
3,121
Finland
If it's a one year deal he's gone. You have to trade him immediately. If you try again next year you risk trading him as a pure rental for a terrible return that will set us back years.

I feel like Fitz should have made that part clear for Bratt personally, sign for long term (5+) or get ready to move out of NJ.
 

Nico Hischier

Registered User
Nov 22, 2017
3,139
2,857
We saw this several pages ago and discussed ad nauseum what in the hell Friedman was talking about.

It was also established that it was taken out of context and that he knows just as much what is going on as we do : which is NOTHING.
Thanks yeah I didn’t see it posted before or I wouldn’t have but yeah I just want to see him signed now just like everyone else here
 

FooteBahl

Took a big shitz for Nemec
Jul 19, 2005
5,491
7,530
Metuchen NJ
I've seen this same sentence posted like 10 times already. People care so little that they just have to let everyone know they don't care.

You should definitely care, if you care for this franchise. Almost everyone we have traded for has been way worse in a Devils jersey, Hamilton, Subban, Tatar, Johnsson, all the goalies.. If Palat, Marino, Haula and Vanecek also suck next season and players we traded away get better in new teams we should definitely care since that would mean we have a huge coaching / system problem.
No I shouldn’t care. Those examples you gave are not one bit comparable. Young guys like Hughes, Sharangovich, Bratt and Nico have shown improvement of varying degrees. Zacha has not. If the change of scenery does him well than so be it…maybe the constant shuffling from C to W hurt his development, but I think it’s just the player and not the circumstance in his case.
 

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,678
50,602
Oh come on, you're better than this. First of all read my other posts so you get what I'm trying to say. Second, hindsight much? It's easy to say that they all suck now, but go read the reactions during the trades. People celebrated the Subban trade, everyone thought we were getting a 0.5ppg great skating puck moving defencemen. He was above 0.5ppg player in his every NHL season until the devils. Everyone except STI loved the Johnson trade, he was seen as an above 0.5ppg top6 forward. He was excellent early last season with Bratt and Mercer, but once that line was separated, he was back to his 20-21 self. Tatar was coming off 60pts and close to ppg seasons. 30years old? Nobody seemed to be bothered by that when we got him. Guess who are also over 30, Palat and Haula.

So people celebrated Subban? So what? WTF does that have to do with his injury-fueled decline? Nashville dumped him at the right time. Congrats to Poile, who knows when to dump a defenseman. Just ask Chuck Fletcher, who is wondering if Ryan Ellis is ever going to play again. (If Nashville had the eye they have for defensemen & goalies for centerman as well they probably would have a Cup by now.)

Are you are arguing his numbers would have been better on a better team? Maybe? Probably? I also don’t give a shit about 2020-21 in general, it was a meat grinder nightmare season of 56 games in a brutal division. We had a new coach, it was a reset “let the kids plays” season, and they had almost no real practices due to the compressed schedule after our COVID break.

People liked the Johnsson trade because we gave up one older prospect for roster player who could score some goals for us. The 2020-21 season was brutal for him specifically due to COVID plus his asthma. The dude is all effort guy who only succeeds by skating his ass off directly towards the net.

I can’t believe we’re going back to his Toronto days yet again but he produced while literally playing with some of the top players in the league AND HE HAD ONE SEASON BETTER THAN 2021-22. That’s it. One season. 2018-19. Go look at his shooting % that year. Go look at his line mates that year. He got PP points. [Actually I’ll put his goals & assists that season at the bottom of this post.]

Tatar was coming off his least productive season in Montreal. He ended the season poorly. He was a 31 year old winger last season and he couldn’t finish for shit for a good portion of the year at the start.

Wingers after 30 are tough, welcome to the age curve.

I don’t see why you’re appealing to the supposed popular takes on the board at the time.

1) That too is a ridiculously broad stroke, so broad that it’s useless.

2) I don’t care what any of the takes were then. Posters didn’t make the trades or signings. Posters didn’t review Subban’s medicals. Posters can be wrong, they don’t have the power to tell the future. Are you saying these players were supposed to do better because fans were excited about the additions? What kind of argument is that?

I disliked the Gusav trade and thought the Subban trade was fine at the time because we needed defense pretty bad, but what do my old takes have to do with you specific argument about these players “doing worse on our team”? I didn’t think Subban was going to get Norris nominations here and I knew he was going to be grossly overpaid. We needed defense.

And “what about Palat then?” Good lord, I guess you weren’t paying much attention to what a lot of people actually wrote here after he signed.

I went to the Tampa board to get their reaction. While they were mourning his loss, some were commenting how sad they were about the amount of bitching we did about that contract. A couple said we don’t know enough about hockey to appreciate Palat (again, these are Tampa fans lol).

I actually try to give realistic but still optimistic takes on things because I’m a fan. Not every winger falls of the face of the earth. I get and acknowledge the concerns while trying to see why Fitz made the move and where it could work out.

I’m hoping we get several good years out of the guy. I actually agree with the intangibles he brings, he’s known to be an incredibly smart player and Fitz referred to him as a player/coach. We get outsmarted by wily veterans in our coverage by players like Palat all the time, we need a guy to teach our young players.

I’m bolstered by Tampa fans, who are gutted at losing him and thought he was going to get even more money than we paid him. They thought a team friendly deal for Tampa was 5m. We just don’t understand hockey enough to realize he’s the best glue guy in the NHL lol.

Re: Haula
I said in my first post. We needed a center. WITHOUT RESTARTING THE FACEOFF DEBATE (I beseech you all lol) I can assure people that the team wanted an experienced center who can win face offs at 3C, so Boqvist was not starting there. I actually see Mercer more as our back-up scoring center in case one of our top guys goes down. He might get time as a 3C, who knows. McLeod is the likely 4C unless something bad happens due to the Hockey Canada scandal (I don’t expect that but again, who knows.)

We needed another center for sure and Haula was cheap. Just because a player scores fewer goals doesn’t mean their rest of their play is worse. Statistically, with forwards, goal scoring is the first to go with age. There is a ton more to playing center than that. I’m definitely not counting on 18 goals again from a 31 year old Haula considering who his line mates were last season (spoiler: Hall & Pasta). He has a 2.375m cap hit and can play center, he fills a need and we have cap issues right now. It wasn’t a dream return but it filled a major need.

AAADD31A-4597-46E7-AD68-88FD17B8FCA6.jpeg


13167115-686A-4D13-9223-DE788909DF4F.jpeg
 
Last edited:

TBF1972

Registered User
May 19, 2018
8,334
6,817
If you want continue to suck you can find ways to do this. We live in 21st century. we will support you. morally.

im not interest in paying a guy for his prime in Calgary with buddy Tkachuk.

This team was not away from compete in one Johnny Gaudreau. Mister Palat did sign for shorter deal, for less money. And will play the role devils lack of. If Devils want to spend huge, they should find a better player. Younger. Who can add something devils lack of. Not what devils have enough of. Devils have enough drivers and playmakers and have no M Tkachuk to repeat JG success. I prefer to spend money on Bratt. Or other player who can help with our problem. With JG under the cap this team would never fix any of other future problem they will have. And they will. They have it now.
it’s not career mode where you are making whatever you want and after one season you delete the game. Fitz making the job and everything have price, especially players who didn’t want to play here. If he wanted it, he would asked for more. He didn’t. Fvck him and everybody who doesn’t want to play in Devils uniform. Or cheat for the devils. Devils has special places for them.

and for people who doesn’t understand math and can’t think in a couple of steps forward.
how can they think a couple steps forward, if they live in the past?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guadana

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
Wait.....what??
I was being silly. The post I responded to said that poster couldn’t believe it was going to arbitration but didn’t specify the player and we were discussing Zacha with Boston at that moment so I was just explaining that I’m sure Boston could avoid arbitration with Zacha if they offered him that contract.
 

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
I feel like Fitz should have made that part clear for Bratt personally, sign for long term (5+) or get ready to move out of NJ.
Bratt knows that. I’m sure his agent has prepared him for that. I’m sure his agent has also convinced him that at this point he just has to avoid injury and be halfway decent for two years thre cap will go up and teams will be lining up to offer him $14.5 mil per for seven years.
 

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,721
38,294
No, but it allows him to negotiate an extension with another team as part of a trade.
What’s a realistic return for Bratt this season with an RFA status? A top-6 guy? Certainly lower than a Tkachuk return, but still an impactful player imo.
 

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,678
50,602
So basically, if Bratt signs a 1 year deal, he’s still an RFA after next season. So at worst, he signs a 1 year deal next summer as well. We have him for 2 years at a minimum.

Do we feel confident in the chances of signing him to a long-term contract next off-season if he signs a 1 year deal this summer, with more cap and big contracts coming off the board next off-season?
I’m going to wait until this is over before planning for various futures, I don’t see the point of speculating on various what ifs that won’t matter after Wednesday at the latest.

Also we’ll get comments from everyone involved so it will be easier to get at least some sense of what happened.

Other people can have a go of course.
 

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
Yes, Zacha will very likely start with Pastrnak and get PP1 minutes, basically given every chance to succeed and lock himself into top6. If he doesn't I feel like he won't get another chance and will be a career bottom6 guy.

Everyone is different I guess, but when the Devils do a trade I at least hope the guy who we get outperforms the guy we give. If Haula can't crack 30pts and Zacha easily outperforms him, I'd be quite disappointed. Anyone who says they don't care, to me it sounds like they are either lying or don't care enough about the team.
It’s apples and oranges. If Zacha plays on Boston’s first and second line all season and only manages 50-55 points that’s sort of meh. If Haula spends all season in the bottom six and scores 40 that’s probably better for NJ in context if Haula can offer some B game to go with the points and maybe he helps mentor Boquist and Zetterlund.

It's weird we can have this pages about Bratt with literally no news, no info and absolutely nothing happening.

This is why I am advocating for a fried chicken discussion.

It's summer time after all.
Took two of the boys to Willie Mae’s Scotch House this week for the best fried chicken in New Orleans. A bit spicier than they expected but it was fantastic. More or less a similar profile to what you’d Exocet in Atlanta or Charleston or Memphis but with a bit more kick which is to be expected given the locale.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,701
30,526
It’s apples and oranges. If Zacha plays on Boston’s first and second line all season and only manages 50-55 points that’s sort of meh. If Haula spends all season in the bottom six and scores 40 that’s probably better for NJ in context if Haula can offer some B game to go with the points and maybe he helps mentor Boquist and Zetterlund.


Took two of the boys to Willie Mae’s Scotch House this week for the best fried chicken in New Orleans. A bit spicier than they expected but it was fantastic. More or less a similar profile to what you’d Exocet in Atlanta or Charleston or Memphis but with a bit more kick which is to be expected given the locale.
I haven't gotten there yet. But I think I might have mentioned it to you before...the best fried chicken I ever had was at Coop's Place about 7 or 8 years ago. It might have been just really good that day because I went back and it wasn't as good as I remembered it. Still good but not as spectacular as the first time I had it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

MauDevils

Registered User
Jan 11, 2009
15,635
10,856
New Jersey
What’s a realistic return for Bratt this season with an RFA status? A top-6 guy? Certainly lower than a Tkachuk return, but still an impactful player imo.
Yeah, I don't know who is out there but you could also potentially swap with someone else who won't sign (Meier?). Or else some kind of Top6+Prospect+Pick package.

If you wait until next year you're looking at the Fiala return ... Mid-Late first and a good prospect. That would be pretty gutting.
 

ninetyeight

Registered User
Jun 3, 2007
2,090
3,121
Finland
* a LOT of text *

Jeeez relax.. :D
Not only did you misunderstand my whole post, you're making this a way bigger argument than it should. You're pouring all your pent up hate and arguments over me. People claimed they didn't care if players leaving the team get better and players coming in get worse. So I hypothetically suggested that would they still feel the same if Ty Smith and Zacha become stars and all our new acquisitions fail. Then I played devils advocate and brought out some examples of stat declining after joining the team. OFCOURSE there's more to it, and I don't really even care, I was just trying to call out bullshit from Zacha haters.

I'm finnish so I'm sorry if my posts are sometimes hard to understand.
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
14,005
14,923
Jeeez relax.. :D
Not only did you misunderstand my whole post, you're making this a way bigger argument than it should. You're pouring all your pent up hate and arguments over me. People claimed they didn't care if players leaving the team get better and players coming in get worse. So I hypothetically suggested that would they still feel the same if Ty Smith and Zacha become stars and all our new acquisitions fail. Then I played devils advocate and brought out some examples of stat declining after joining the team. OFCOURSE there's more to it, and I don't really even care, I was just trying to call out bullshit from Zacha haters.

I'm finnish so I'm sorry if my posts are sometimes hard to understand.

I recognize the language barrier makes things difficult, but the tendency on this board for people to ask a question like 'What if all our moves are just terrible?' and then just walk away from an explanation for why certain moves didn't work is baffling.

Zacha's not good. He's never been good. He is an okay player that any decent team is going to look into upgrading.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad