Ripshot 43
Registered User
- Jul 21, 2010
- 14,257
- 12,301
Who are you, my wife?
Who are you, my wife?
I'm guessing Hughes, Hughes, Nemec, bratt, Nico, Dougie, Mercer, Marino.Who do you suggest we move for some sandpaper?
This contract is fine. The 3 years is weird... but if we're ever in true cap trouble, it's because of Palat. Not MacDermid.
If Smith gets re-signed I'll freak out. But his house in Westfield is on the market so I think he's gone.
Yeah goons fighting goons doesn't do it for me cause goons are the only ones who have enough rocks in their head to fight each other anyway. And yay the crowd gets juice for three minutes and that's about all we wind up playing the fourth line cause it's got maybe two hockey players on it.MacDerimid was playing when Siegs got his head elbowed into the third row. He isn’t going to protect anybody and will never be on the ice with Jack, Nico or Bratt.
He’ll have a “code” fight every now and then after one of our guys gets run, that’s about it.
Completely off topic, but I find it amazing that people use a phrase that refers to an old TV show that most people here aren't even old enough to have seen, and the ones who are old enough probably don't remember.Fitz completely jumped the shark because of Rempe the way Drury did because of Tom Wilson.
I don’t think so. There is no one way to win in the playoffs, that’s mostly just a silly narrative. You have to have a goalie playing well and a PP that executes at a decent rate. That’s the bulk of what decides who goes home and who advances. Florida had a 3% PP in 21-22 and went home in the 2nd round. 21% last year with a hot Bob and they make a the cup. That was probably more important than the tough guy dick measuring contest.Still that element of "toughness" is necessary....you don't have to beat anyone up but you do need guys that willing and able to do anything to win.
Watching Bennett and Marchand is the epitome of it. No regular skater on our roster is willing or able to play a game like that and if we find ourselves in that type of game we're pretty much done.
Of course.. fundamentals don't change in the playoffs...you still need timely saves, you still need to capitalize on your chances...but Florida also doesn't have to worry about getting run out of the building physically either. Their best players are bulls. They can play the game anyway needed. It's certainly not one or the other, it's the ability to do it all.I don’t think so. There is no one way to win in the playoffs, that’s mostly just a silly narrative. You have to have a goalie playing well and a PP that executes at a decent rate. That’s the bulk of what decides who goes home and who advances. Florida had a 3% PP in 21-22 and went home in the 2nd round. 21% last year with a hot Bob and they make a the cup. That was probably more important than the tough guy dick measuring contest.
That’s an interesting strategy. What would you call such a strategy?Yeah goons fighting goons doesn't do it for me cause goons are the only ones who have enough rocks in their head to fight each other anyway. And yay the crowd gets juice for three minutes and that's about all we wind up playing the fourth line cause it's got maybe two hockey players on it.
There's only one surefire way for a goon to 'protect' star players...proportional, mutually assured destruction.
The only defense you said at the end is everything. What's the downside of signing him that isn't mitigated by that right there.
If you need him, you got him, if you don't, who cares.
I watched the Rangers play mostly like shit at even strength and not very tough with a good goalie and PP against a team with a ghastly PP and goalie. And I can very easily see the Rangers winning with those same strengths against Florida if they even make it past Boston.Of course.. fundamentals don't change in the playoffs...you still need timely saves, you still need to capitalize on your chances...but Florida also doesn't have to worry about getting run out of the building physically either. Their best players are bulls. They can play the game anyway needed. It's certainly not one or the other, it's the ability to do it all.
We can't even put together some semblance of a physical nasty game. There is literally no one in this lineup that plays with any sort of a mean streak. Not sure how anyone could watch these Eastern playoffs and not see how deficient our team is in the style of game that has been played in these playoffs.
If he's going to be that most of the time why give him three years at anything more than league minimum?I can't believe signing a 4th liner/AHL player is causing so much drama. This signing has zero effect on anything. He'll likely be a healthy scratch or get waived and brought back up when they need him.
It's not that serious people.
The third year is weird. He didn't even give Smith a third year and he's arguably more useful than MacDermid.If he's going to be that most of the time why give him three years at anything more than league minimum?
Alright, I'm not that worried or upset about it. You seemed like you were so I gave you plenty of ways and reasons to not be. If are you still upset and bothered by it, there is not much more I can say, and that's ok.We are still losing cap space, a contract slot, and waiver flexibility - this is not found money just because he can be buried for 400k.
Don’t understand doing it with so much time before FA even opens, who were they bidding against?
Reverting to my prior statement: I both agree and disagree with you.If it was a year the last 5 pages wouldn't have happened. The term is the biggest issue albeit probably not a significant one. I do worry that it's a precursor to future poor signings.
We are still losing cap space, a contract slot, and waiver flexibility - this is not found money just because he can be buried for 400k.
Don’t understand doing it with so much time before FA even opens, who were they bidding against?
TRUCULENCEI dont see how trading all our remaining valuable assets for another winger is the move this offseason tbh
I'd rather do that for a LHD
You’re not dragging me in to a silly debate, I don’t care enough about him getting a deal that can be completely buried if in the AHL. And it’s a shade over league minimum, not a big deal at all.If he's going to be that most of the time why give him three years at anything more than league minimum?