MasterofGrond
No, I'm not serious.
Thank god I can always count on Bleedred to bring the discussion back to Blackwood, his favorite player.
Erik "top-nine" Haula had a 9/8 primary/secondary assist split at even-strength. Damn, don't think he's a 3rd line scoring type. And that's in more ice time and playing a lot of the season with Jack.
Mikey had 3 fewer total points at even-strength.
I'm not slagging Haula. I like him. But the "Mcleod is a mid 4th liner" narrative is objectively wrong.
A who gets points at a 3rd line level and has plus defensive utility is pretty firmly in the middle of the distribution of NHL forwards. By definition, that is not a 4th liner.
Eric Haula also isn't an offensive blackhole with the puck on his stick when actually watching the game thus why the eye test was mentioned. It's the same song and dance we had with Miles Wood and why he's not a 3rd liner either. Skill matters and Mikey has the offensive skill of a cement block. He skates fast, plays physical and takes faceoffs. He's a 4th liner. Haula has the ability to play up and down the lineup because he's not offensively inept in the same ways Mikey is. It's a literal adventure when the puck finds Mikey's stick.Erik "top-nine" Haula had a 9/8 primary/secondary assist split at even-strength. Damn, don't think he's a 3rd line scoring type. And that's in more ice time and playing a lot of the season with Jack.
Mikey had 3 fewer total points at even-strength.
I'm not slagging Haula. I like him. But the "Mcleod is a mid 4th liner" narrative is objectively wrong.
A player who gets points at a 3rd line level and has plus defensive utility is pretty firmly in the middle of the distribution of NHL forwards. By definition, that is not a 4th liner.
Well, I don't care to talk about him too much anymore on this forum. At least not until he starts getting shellacked in San Jose and I can start sticking it to all the people who made me feel like a dummy for being very adamant he wouldn't bounce back. Just like the Cory stuff.Thank god I can always count on Bleedred to bring the discussion back to Blackwood, his favorite player.
Nor the eye test.Erik Haula also shot at like 3% for most of the year, Haula’s had a 27 goal season from the 3C. They’re not comparable at all from a production standpoint.
We certainly get way softer if everyone that's available now is gone.not okay with letting Mcleod go for anything under 2m. He has to stay. Just my opinion but this team needs his skill set to round out the roster.
That is exactly what you're saying. You're completely ignoring assists as part of a player's production. Only goals should be considered. This is the evaluation you are clearly making.I missed the part where I said they weren’t? But anyway, players that score 4 goals in 80 games shouldn’t get more than 4th line minutes. At least on a team that wants to win anything.
is .893 top half now? Damn, the league has gotten badblackwood was actually in the top half of goalies league-wide in most major categories. i think he’ll have a nice career out there.
McLeod receives irattional hate because his best skill is faceoffs which half the sports world has determined are more meaningless than ... a good starting goalie, which is the new Fad among hockey fans, just tossing aside an entire position because Adin Hill win a CupErik "top-nine" Haula had a 9/8 primary/secondary assist split at even-strength. Damn, don't think he's a 3rd line scoring type. And that's in more ice time and playing a lot of the season with Jack.
Mikey had 3 fewer total points at even-strength.
I'm not slagging Haula. I like him. But the "Mcleod is a mid 4th liner" narrative is objectively wrong.
A player who gets points at a 3rd line level and has plus defensive utility is pretty firmly in the middle of the distribution of NHL forwards. By definition, that is not a 4th liner.
SJ is so last week.Well, I don't care to talk about him too much anymore on this forum. At least not until he starts getting shellacked in San Jose and I can start sticking it to all the people who made me feel like a dummy for being very adamant he wouldn't bounce back. Just like the Cory stuff.
But I saw someone else post about it. I think I need to copy and paste that over on the Sharks forum right now.
Is Nathan Bastian a 3rd liner?That is exactly what you're saying. You're completely ignoring assists as part of a player's production. Only goals should be considered. This is the evaluation you are clearly making.
26 points is solid 3rd line level production.
Yeah, McLeod is better than Bastian. Period. Having said that, I don't think Mikey is worth double Lazars price.No offense.. but if we are taking the team record when a fourth liner is or isnt playing as a determinative statistic, then the original argument has been lost
Bastian quite literally cannot affect a game the same way McLeod can. How many times has Bastian started an overtime? How many times has Bastian lined up with ten seconds left in the defensive zone? Or ten seconds left in the offensive zone? How many games has Bastian played over 10ATOI?
Bastian is a good fourth liner but people just dislike Mikey and like Nate more when they claim hes the better player; he isnt and its inarguable
You got me. Goal scoring from 6 years ago is how you determine if a player is good.Erik Haula also shot at like 3% for most of the year, Haula’s had a 27 goal season from the 3C. They’re not comparable at all from a production standpoint.
Am I? Huh. I’m completely ignoring assists when I directly call him a good playmaker in a previous post?That is exactly what you're saying. You're completely ignoring assists as part of a player's production. Only goals should be considered. This is the evaluation you are clearly making.
26 points is solid 3rd line level production.
He shot that low because he has one of the worst shots in the NHL. Part of why he’s a 4th liner, btw.You got me. Goal scoring from 6 years ago is how you determine if a player is good.
Mikey also shot 3.66% for the season.
I don't know why it's hard for anyone to admit that 26 points is actually not 4th line production.
This is kind of reminding me of some WWE attitude era angle. Like weird double cross swerves. Fitz cutting a Vince McMahon style promo saying he suckered everybody by getting a 6th for Blackwood, yet still bringing him back anyway, along with the 6th round pick.SJ is so last week.
Now that Blackwood is about the free agent market Fitz can bring him back to NJ. With the doubts surrounding Vanacek after the playoffs, it's a good bet NJ will want to sign up Blackwood, the Devil you know (hah, see what I did there), for maybe five or six years. I'm sure that sort of rock solid consistency in goal would warm your heart.
Yes. He can be a sneaky option for Hughes line. Play wing but take faceoffs.Duchene can play wing ?
I don't even value faceoffs that much. But Mcleod is a solid player.McLeod receives irattional hate because his best skill is faceoffs which half the sports world has determined are more meaningless than ... a good starting goalie, which is the new Fad among hockey fans, just tossing aside an entire position because Adin Hill win a Cup
If McLeod had one skill better than his faceoffs hed be liked but alas hes not. Luckily though Ruff and coaching staffs realize faceoffs matter and its how McLeod gets OT starts or late game faceoffs
Is Nathan Bastian a 3rd liner?I don't even value faceoffs that much. But Mcleod is a solid player.
Literally every argument anyone has pointed to is easily refuted.