MasterofGrond
No, I'm not serious.
how many career 40 goal game droughts can a man have and still be a 3rd liner
12/10 primary to secondary assist rate (11/10 EV strength, 1 PK primary assist). Don't think he's a 3rd line scoring type at all, especially not on when factoring in the eye test.He had 26 points last season. That's pretty well into third line production.
Your perception of true 4th liners is pretty skewed then. That's more like a Lazar.
No offense.. but if we are taking the team record when a fourth liner is or isnt playing as a determinative statistic, then the original argument has been lostHe was the line driver on that BMW line. Also look at our record with v without him last year. He’s basically the Ryan Carter from the CBGB line, most underrated guy and doesn’t get his flowers by this fanbase + around the league
Mikey, as a package, is about the same as Lazar. worse defensively, better PK, better FO.
Starting an overtime with McLeod is not worth it. Just start with Hischier, I promise you the math says it's a better choice because one dude doesn't have to immediately skate off because his hands are made of stone.
I missed the part where I said they weren’t? But anyway, players that score 4 goals in 80 games shouldn’t get more than 4th line minutes. At least on a team that wants to win anything.I was unaware that assists were not included in point totals. Good to know.
I know, unfortunate for the chatters online, but faceoffs hold meaningwhen people describe what McLeod's best attribute is, and they have to say "hes great at faceoffs", thats not a player that I really have much of a care about. If thats the best thing about a player, that player is super replaceable.
I love McLeod and what he brings and I hope he comes back, but he is expendable.What/who would you consider a top end fourth liner? Or is this just a silly pedestal about having third liners on your fourth line?
Its not about wanting to start with McLeod, its about him being a worthwhile selection in that positionStarting an overtime with McLeod is not worth it. Just start with Hischier, I promise you the math says it's a better choice because one dude doesn't have to immediately skate off because his hands are made of stone.
If you put together a checklist on what attributes you want from a 4th line center. McLeod ticks most boxes with the exception of scoring:He certainly is not.
The problem is face-offs are grossly oversimplified. W/L. It's like grading a class as Pass/Fail. If they tracked clean face-off wins leading to shots it would look much different.Faceoffs matter very, very little overall.
We don't need to do this debate again though.
I would say Hathaway is an elite 4th liner. Hit machine, excellent defensive impacts, can score 13-14 goals a year.What/who would you consider a top end fourth liner? Or is this just a silly pedestal about having third liners on your fourth line?
yeah hathaway is a gold standardI would say Hathaway is an elite 4th liner. Hit machine, excellent defensive impacts, can score 13-14 goals a year.
Erik "top-nine" Haula had a 9/8 primary/secondary assist split at even-strength. Damn, don't think he's a 3rd line scoring type. And that's in more ice time and playing a lot of the season with Jack.12/10 primary to secondary assist rate (11/10 EV strength, 1 PK primary assist). Don't think he's a 3rd line scoring type at all, especially not on when factoring in the eye test.
PK stuff is a legitimate concern, it's the one thing that trips me up here, so i get it. FO stuff is truly whatever.
but 4th liners don't just play against 4th liners. At least ours f***ing don't. Can't count the number of times BMW (during the bad era last season) got pinned by the opponents top 6 because Mikey can't control the puck in the offensive zone for longer than 1.5 seconds