devilsblood
Registered User
- Mar 10, 2010
- 30,305
- 12,667
@My3Sons take note as to what real humor looks like.Good thing he shoots right.
Don't want TWO left Feete.
@My3Sons take note as to what real humor looks like.Good thing he shoots right.
Don't want TWO left Feete.
Sure. You are the arbiter of humor. How could I have missed that with your sterling credentials.@My3Sons take note as to what real humor looks like.
I'm not sure how accurate these defensive metrics are for wingers. Especially knowing Utica had weak center depth. Do we have #'s for his most common centers?Doubt Clarke should be used in a defensive role either. Doesn’t seem to be a strength at all.
I generally don’t think we need to be hard matching anyone. Roll 4 lines, we can have play drivers on each of the top 3 lines if we choose to.
I think most nights it will be the opposition that will want to hard match against our top guys. They’ll want line X on Hughes as much as possible, get pairing Y away from Hughes/Nico as much as possible. This top 9 is lethal, regardless of if it’s Holtz or whoever that can claim that 3rd line spot.
I'm not sure how accurate these defensive metrics are for wingers. Especially knowing Utica had weak center depth. Do we have #'s for his most common centers?
I've barely seen Clarke play, but I've seen Holtz in the NHL play, and I could definitely see Clarke bringing a more well rounded game then Holtz.
Sounds like a recipe for 7 Dmen.I think the 3RW determines whether this is the best top 9 in the league or the best top 6 with a decent 3rd line. Palat-Haula’s a really good 3rd line duo but if that 3rd player isn’t all that good it limits them. If they are good then all 3 lines could be contending for best 1/2/3 line. Could also end up sliding down Bratt or Meier to drive the hell out of the 3rd line if need be
We can go crazy and have Mercer center Bratt on the “3rd” line if we really want to spread it out. Not sure I love Dawson at C, but Bratt and Mercer were pretty dominant a couple years ago and that was with Johnsson as the 3rd wheel.I think the 3RW determines whether this is the best top 9 in the league or the best top 6 with a decent 3rd line. Palat-Haula’s a really good 3rd line duo but if that 3rd player isn’t all that good it limits them. If they are good then all 3 lines could be contending for best 1/2/3 line. Could also end up sliding down Bratt or Meier to drive the hell out of the 3rd line if need be
If things progresses like it has, it will eventully hit a cap determined by the cap hit.If he's legitimately good then it's definitely not a no go. If he can succeed on that 3rd line then I'm 100% putting him with Jack and giving that a go. You don't shove a guy lower in the lineup because you're scared he might be too good and produce too much. That's nonsense. It shouldn't be much of an uphill to get that 3RW at this point. The competition isn't that big. It's not like he's going to have to battle it out and beat an established NHLer. He's going to be against 2 unproven guys themselves in Clarke and Foote. Maybe they go Foote if they want the bigger guy but he's produced much less than the other 2 at the AHL level. I also think they've talked about wanting more righties which gives Clarke and Holtz an edge. Clarke could beat out Holtz but it's not some insurmountable position for Holtz to be in.
We can go crazy and have Mercer center Bratt on the “3rd” line if we really want to spread it out. Not sure I love Dawson at C, but Bratt and Mercer were pretty dominant a couple years ago and that was with Johnsson as the 3rd wheel.
Palat-Nico-Timo
Haula-Hughes-Toffoli
Bratt-Mercer-Holtz
So many possibilities. Not a whole lot the opposition can do with matchups.
I didn't realize the older Foote fell off that hard. I remember when he was considering a very good prospect
And now we can have a FooteBahl pairing. @FooteBahlNow we just need to put the best Foote forward.
I'll see you guys on opening night.
Ridiculous! Graphs and charts is all you need…It's hard to judge how good Clarke is defensivley when many people on here are judging things off a graph and not actually have seen him play much
Give me all of the Footes and all of the Bahls!
If things progresses like it has, it will eventully hit a cap determined by the cap hit.
I can see a lot of success the next season when you have extreme value players like Nosek & Mcleod for 1M, Miller at 2M and Toffoli at 4M. If there is success, that will also increase the price of other players as well and you quickly end up in a situation where someone has to get paid or let go. With this much good players on short contracts that time will come after a single season. It's not contract year for Holtz, but if he gets a 40 goal season and gets a 8M contract all of the players above are automaticlly out, no matter even if they would want to sign a minimum wage discount contracts.
While we haven't seen these guys play yet, I think it's safe to say that a young 40 goal scorer is nowhere near as valuable as those high value players are.
Highly doubt we see it early in the year. And if we do see it later in the year, it will merely be a transition to when Nemec officially replaces Miller.Speaking of 7 Dmen...makes me wonder if Nemec could have an effect on Holtz getting a spot?
If they decide to go with a right side of Hamilton - Merino - Miller - Nemec 7th for any amount of time, I'd imagine Holtz or whoever that 9th forward is would be most effected by going 7D.
Good thing he shoots right.
Don't want TWO left Feete.
@My3Sons take note as to what real humor looks like.
Nosek and McLeod are fine 4th lines. They're not extreme value. Miller's fine value. Toffoli's great value but 1 year left regardless. Nemec and Holtz on their ELCs would provide more FAR value the following year than Miller and Toffoli. What you're saying is absurd. A 40 goal Holtz for a year on his ELC is MILES MORE VALUABLE than Nosek, McLeod, and Miller combined. We'd also still likely be able to keep Toffoli short term because we'd have Holtz on his ELC still.
We need a contingency plan for Holtz scoring 40 goals and getting 8m in 2025-26, this is now pressing concern.
What if he gets 60 goals? Then we won’t even be able to afford him.
If we're doing this, then check this one out :Still my all-time favorite take, it’s got everything in one glorious post:
View attachment 734802View attachment 734803View attachment 734804
F Alexis Lafreniere - Rimouski Oceanic, QMJHL (2020 Draft) Part 2
Let's keep this on topic everybody. Back to Lafreniere who I project to be better than Matthews but worse than Laine. Agree or disagree?forums.hfboards.com
Lafreniere will come out the best player of his draft. Please bookmark my post as you wish. Alexis Lafreniere will become a PPG player in this league real soon. People thinking otherwise don't what type of player he is. He's a winner, a professional and a heck of a hockey player. You win Cups with players like Laffy. Just wait and see.
People were quick to judge Nathan MacKinnon after his sophomore season when he hit a slump. It won't happen to Alexis. This kid will keep improving year after year until he's amongst the league's best. You can't break him.
The money you could have made betting him Mercer would have more points today than Laf.If we're doing this, then check this one out :
F Alexis Lafreniere (2020, 1st, NYR) part 4
People keep saying this . No he did not . He scored some goalie when team like Vancouver clinched a playoff birth and was resting their regulars . Over 1/2 his 17 goals came at the end of the year . Did they really. He started the season in late January. Scored many of his goals against Vezina...forums.hfboards.com
Well..that post didn't age well, did it? heehee.