Devils team discussion (news, notes and speculation) - 2023 offseason part II

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
why do people just say these things willy nilly like this? They are not true.

losing Miles Wood is addition by subtraction. Even good teams and good GMs make bad moves.
Ok, show me a better 4th line then, or back up your claim.

1688395533714.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stephen Gionta
A healthy Miles Wood could be a net positive, but after the hip injury his speed and skating took a hit. His hockey IQ is not there though - those almost mandatory offensive-zone penalties hurt us on a number of occasions. I was a fan, but I'm not sad to see him go. That was a spot that needed improvement.
 
Ok, show me a better 4th line then, or back up your claim.

View attachment 725686

The reason why they had such a high goals percentage is their on-ice save percentage, which forwards don't have much control over, if any. So yeah, they were at 50% xG and 58% High-Danger Chances, both of which are solid numbers for a 4th line, but the reason why they were +6 in that time is that the goalies stopped 96.2% of the opposing shots.
 
Colorado signing Wood to that contract is by far the most baffling thing not involving Ryan Reaves of this entire offseason so far.

He wont finish that deal in Colorado.

As i looked over some of those deals with term and low money, I think they will be extremely easy to move in the future. Wouldn't shock me 1 bit of those guys who got 6 7 8 year deals for 3.5 or lower get moved a couple times during those deals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons
I like Wood and I wish him all the best in Col. Now that we're spending to the cap we have to be really careful, from ensuring we can make improvements come deadline, sign next year's RFAs and replace injuries. His locker room experience is no longer needed, he regressed after the injury and priced himself out of NJ. Fitz likes Foote instead so count me in.
 
The reason why they had such a high goals percentage is their on-ice save percentage, which forwards don't have much control over, if any. So yeah, they were at 50% xG and 58% High-Danger Chances, both of which are solid numbers for a 4th line, but the reason why they were +6 in that time is that the goalies stopped 96.2% of the opposing shots.
Forwards can have control of the amount of high danger chances. The reason why Bergeron's lines have been on top of the goals% over a decade isn't as much the offensive side, but the fact that Bergeron makes sure that forwards play the right way.

I've followed a good 20 years purely defensive centers play. I don't care about points at all, all I care is the defensive sticks, rush coverage, back/forecheck of the forwards. Unlike other major sports, hockey is a team sport where the defensive coverage is much more important than what general fans belive. Teams with offensive minded star forwards often end up with situation where they are top heavy, and while the stars might be playing >50% hockey and outscoring some their defensive deficiencys, its not enough since they can't afford quality depth to do the same with bottom line players.
 
McLeod has officially become a player that sometimes people have extreme opinion of in either direction. There is not much middle ground with him.

There's people arguing that he's this defensive god that prevents a significant number of goals against from happening over an entire year, and then there's people that make him out to be not much different or better than someone like Stephen Gionta or god forbid Rod Pelley.

I prefer to take the middle ground with him.
 
Forwards can have control of the amount of high danger chances. The reason why Bergeron's lines have been on top of the goals% over a decade isn't as much the offensive side, but the fact that Bergeron makes sure that forwards play the right way.

In a conversation about Miles Wood, we are talking about Patrice Bergeron.
 
McLeod has officially become a player that sometimes people have extreme opinion of in either direction. There is not much middle ground with him.

There's people arguing that he's this defensive god that prevents a significant number of goals against from happening over an entire year, and then there's people that make him out to be not much different or better than someone like Stephen Gionta or god forbid Rod Pelley.

I prefer to take the middle ground with him.

As someone who has fallen into the latter camp for the most part, I think it was pretty clear that he took a step forward in the playoffs. If he maintains that level of play throughout the season, it will be a big improvement to our center depth.
 
Oh, if that's the case I could definitely see them sit tight and be done for the offseason
Actually, on top of that, if were smart we'll leave room for performance bonuses. Luke and Nemec has a high possibility of hitting a bunch of them, and anything we can't pay for this year is applied against NEXT years cap, and I think we need as much as we can gather next year for Mercer and co.
 
In a conversation about Miles Wood, we are talking about Patrice Bergeron.
Someone brought up the high danger shots, which I think defensive minded lines are very much influencing and there it's very hard to prove otherwise in the Bergeron case. I could have brought in the Greenway - Erikson-Ek - Folingo who have been completely dominant in the past few years but general fans are not familiar with that line. While I haven't gone through Wood individual performance last year, I can still say he and his line played fierce forecheck and backcheck. The fact that they had such a good goals% is not coincidence, that line had the defensive dynamics correct with good faceoffs, good communication and guys who were willing to battle hard both ends of the ice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons
McLeod has officially become a player that sometimes people have extreme opinion of in either direction. There is not much middle ground with him.

There's people arguing that he's this defensive god that prevents a significant number of goals against from happening over an entire year, and then there's people that make him out to be not much different or better than someone like Stephen Gionta or god forbid Rod Pelley.

I prefer to take the middle ground with him.

Exactly.

Overall, he’s probably a slightly better than average 4th liner who is absolutely elite in the faceoff dot.

His ability to win faceoffs is a big asset, but overall as a player, he’s not going to make or break the team.

I’d definitely rather have him on the roster than not though.
 
Forwards can have control of the amount of high danger chances. The reason why Bergeron's lines have been on top of the goals% over a decade isn't as much the offensive side, but the fact that Bergeron makes sure that forwards play the right way.

They cannot have that much control. Absolutely nobody maintains an on-ice save percentage of 96%. Bergeron is a great defensive player, who has played almost exclusively in front of excellent goalies, on a team that overcounts shots against, and he has a 92.6% on-ice save percentage.

I've followed a good 20 years purely defensive centers play. I don't care about points at all, all I care is the defensive sticks, rush coverage, back/forecheck of the forwards. Unlike other major sports, hockey is a team sport where the defensive coverage is much more important than what general fans belive. Teams with offensive minded star forwards often end up with situation where they are top heavy, and while the stars might be playing >50% hockey and outscoring some their defensive deficiencys, its not enough since they can't afford quality depth to do the same with bottom line players.

The problem is that Miles Wood just doesn't fit into this calculus of defensive sticks/rush coverage/etc. I do not think he is strong defensively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons and Aurinko
Actually, on top of that, if were smart we'll leave room for performance bonuses. Luke and Nemec has a high possibility of hitting a bunch of them, and anything we can't pay for this year is applied against NEXT years cap, and I think we need as much as we can gather next year for Mercer and co.

I just looked this up, and there are two types of bonuses that are available. “A” level are for pretty attainable things like (for a defenseman) scoring 10 goals or 25 assists as a defenseman, all rookie team, top four in ice time among the team’s defensemen.

“A” level bonuses are worth a maximum of $850k total.

“B” level bonuses are for things like being top 10 in the league in goals or assists, winning the Hart, Selke, Norris, Conn Smythe, etc.

If you hit any of the requirements, you get a flat $2 million, and you don’t get any more if you hit more than one.

We have $422,500 in carryover bonuses from last year, which I’m pretty sure went to Dawson Mercer. I think it’s pretty unlikely that Luke and Nemec combine for more than that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons and Nubmer6
The way he left was wildly unprofessional tbh. He didn't know he had to speak? f*** off, he's done it every other year. He was told he wouldn't be back so he took his ball and went home. I liked Tatar and I wanted him back but he's an absolute ghost in the playoffs and we're a playoff team now.

Are people suggesting he didn’t know he had to speak? Lol

I’m actually touched that he was that emotional about not coming back, if that’s what he heard from Fitz. (And I assume it was that or a very vague maybe, but you go see what’s out there.)

He was all in on the team. I really liked having him here. I also assume he’s going to get more money than people think.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad