Ok, show me a better 4th line then, or back up your claim.why do people just say these things willy nilly like this? They are not true.
losing Miles Wood is addition by subtraction. Even good teams and good GMs make bad moves.
Ok, show me a better 4th line then, or back up your claim.why do people just say these things willy nilly like this? They are not true.
losing Miles Wood is addition by subtraction. Even good teams and good GMs make bad moves.
Pretty sure Mcleod and Bastian are the main reasons for that, sorry to say.
Colorado signing Wood to that contract is by far the most baffling thing not involving Ryan Reaves of this entire offseason so far.
It’s the definition of “I don’t bet on myself” type of contract.Colorado signing Wood to that contract is by far the most baffling thing not involving Ryan Reaves of this entire offseason so far.
It’s the definition of “I don’t bet on myself” type of contract.
We really only have about 1.5m in cap space once we re-sign Bahl and fill in the 23 man roster with our rookies.
That's a very reasonable amount to have going into the season.
Forwards can have control of the amount of high danger chances. The reason why Bergeron's lines have been on top of the goals% over a decade isn't as much the offensive side, but the fact that Bergeron makes sure that forwards play the right way.The reason why they had such a high goals percentage is their on-ice save percentage, which forwards don't have much control over, if any. So yeah, they were at 50% xG and 58% High-Danger Chances, both of which are solid numbers for a 4th line, but the reason why they were +6 in that time is that the goalies stopped 96.2% of the opposing shots.
Forwards can have control of the amount of high danger chances. The reason why Bergeron's lines have been on top of the goals% over a decade isn't as much the offensive side, but the fact that Bergeron makes sure that forwards play the right way.
McLeod has officially become a player that sometimes people have extreme opinion of in either direction. There is not much middle ground with him.
There's people arguing that he's this defensive god that prevents a significant number of goals against from happening over an entire year, and then there's people that make him out to be not much different or better than someone like Stephen Gionta or god forbid Rod Pelley.
I prefer to take the middle ground with him.
Actually, on top of that, if were smart we'll leave room for performance bonuses. Luke and Nemec has a high possibility of hitting a bunch of them, and anything we can't pay for this year is applied against NEXT years cap, and I think we need as much as we can gather next year for Mercer and co.Oh, if that's the case I could definitely see them sit tight and be done for the offseason
Someone brought up the high danger shots, which I think defensive minded lines are very much influencing and there it's very hard to prove otherwise in the Bergeron case. I could have brought in the Greenway - Erikson-Ek - Folingo who have been completely dominant in the past few years but general fans are not familiar with that line. While I haven't gone through Wood individual performance last year, I can still say he and his line played fierce forecheck and backcheck. The fact that they had such a good goals% is not coincidence, that line had the defensive dynamics correct with good faceoffs, good communication and guys who were willing to battle hard both ends of the ice.In a conversation about Miles Wood, we are talking about Patrice Bergeron.
McLeod has officially become a player that sometimes people have extreme opinion of in either direction. There is not much middle ground with him.
There's people arguing that he's this defensive god that prevents a significant number of goals against from happening over an entire year, and then there's people that make him out to be not much different or better than someone like Stephen Gionta or god forbid Rod Pelley.
I prefer to take the middle ground with him.
Forwards can have control of the amount of high danger chances. The reason why Bergeron's lines have been on top of the goals% over a decade isn't as much the offensive side, but the fact that Bergeron makes sure that forwards play the right way.
I've followed a good 20 years purely defensive centers play. I don't care about points at all, all I care is the defensive sticks, rush coverage, back/forecheck of the forwards. Unlike other major sports, hockey is a team sport where the defensive coverage is much more important than what general fans belive. Teams with offensive minded star forwards often end up with situation where they are top heavy, and while the stars might be playing >50% hockey and outscoring some their defensive deficiencys, its not enough since they can't afford quality depth to do the same with bottom line players.
Actually, on top of that, if were smart we'll leave room for performance bonuses. Luke and Nemec has a high possibility of hitting a bunch of them, and anything we can't pay for this year is applied against NEXT years cap, and I think we need as much as we can gather next year for Mercer and co.
The way he left was wildly unprofessional tbh. He didn't know he had to speak? f*** off, he's done it every other year. He was told he wouldn't be back so he took his ball and went home. I liked Tatar and I wanted him back but he's an absolute ghost in the playoffs and we're a playoff team now.