If you think the team will be worse off making these trades, then you don't do them. I don't care if the team is not a legit Stanley Cup contender - learning to win is important and I wouldn't want to do anything that diminishes their ability to do that right now.
Now if you believe that Devils can still be as good as they are now without these guys, that's a different story. The only reason I hesitate to believe this could be the case is because we really have no one else to rely on for defensive depth if injuries occur. That being the reality, I'd only consider trading Sevs for a roster player that might round out some of our deficiencies. What are the chances Fitz can swing such a trade? Seems slim.
Yeah - this is the balance. I understand the perspective.
But, I think the team's ability to "learn to win" is the same with or without Severson. I don't think he's the difference between making the playoffs / missing them, or winning the first round / losing.
I do think that there's a psychological aspect. He's clearly a good player, and losing a good player (and someone who's been part of the team for so long) is hard. I don't think the Devils get back an equivalent roster player.
Still, I think trading Severson will be important for the future of the team. The Devils have a limited pipeline of forwards, and goalie is still pretty uncertain. I think a Severson trade looks more like the Blues trading Shattenkirk. Get back maybe a depth player and futures. Those futures can be flipped for what the Devils need, or can be part of the next generation - whatever Fitz wants.
The Devils are losing Severson in the off-season anyway. If he's not the key piece in a Cup run, trade him at the deadline, get assets, and get the rest of the team executing in a Severson-less world this year.