Devils team discussion (news, notes and speculation) - 2022-23 season thread part III

Status
Not open for further replies.

Guttersniped

Satan’s Wallpaper
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
23,090
52,270
I think it's time for a trade. We need to ship off Severson. Tbh he's been absolute trash in that 3rd pairing role & I think we would be better off trading him for a top 6 forward. Put in Smith-Bahl as our 3rd pairing & call it a day. I don't think we would be worse off at all. We would be a much better team with a legitimate scoring threat rather than Severson, especially since we got Bahl whose no slouch to replace him temporarily.

See a lot trades happening around the league? There likely won’t be a major deal done anytime soon by any team.

I’ll be surprised if anything major happens before Feb.
 

StevensRocks

Registered User
May 18, 2021
136
119
Boquist and Rango do not bring enough elsewhere, to offset their black-hole board play. Forechecking cream-puffs who lose every "battle", often ending up on the ice.

They are not pieces on a contender...

I'm also not liking what I'm seeing out of Holtz in this regard.
 

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
22,437
40,015
Boquist and Rango do not bring enough elsewhere, to offset their black-hole board play. Forechecking cream-puffs who lose every "battle", often ending up on the ice.

They are not pieces on a contender...

I'm also not liking what I'm seeing out of Holtz in this regard.
Rango was very good last night on the forecheck and along the boards, he had a few takeaways down low. He usually is effective along the wall, he’s an underrated board player and forechecker.

Had one of his best games in a while when back up in the top-6. That’s where he should be going forward.
 

guitarguyvic

Registered User
Mar 31, 2010
9,217
7,929
No kidding, I picked up on that.

You don’t see the difference between 5-10 teams not making the playoffs and 16 teams not making the playoffs? Because there’s a difference.

People act like this is some grand unchanging tradition when the format has changed before too.
The semi-finals became a best of 7 in 1986-87.
I don't want more teams in the playoffs. What's so great about having a couple of mediocre teams play a few more games? I think it would make the regular season less exciting because each point is less critical. Bringing up the past formats doesn't help the argument either...back when only a handful of teams missed the playoffs, half the league was playing for nothing by the middle of the season. That's lame.
 

Bleedred

#InstagramHockey
Sponsor
May 1, 2011
135,021
65,809
They want him gone. I wouldn't be surprised if he's a healthy scratch next game.
There is clearly no indication that they want him gone.

At least not before the conclusion of this year.

I don't think any of us want him back after this year, but I still stand by that our lineup is better with him in it. In 2-3 years from now? Maybe not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

SteveCangialosi123

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
30,274
55,643
NJ
Boquist and Rango do not bring enough elsewhere, to offset their black-hole board play. Forechecking cream-puffs who lose every "battle", often ending up on the ice.

They are not pieces on a contender...

I'm also not liking what I'm seeing out of Holtz in this regard.
He’s not a piece on a contender until he gets hot during a playoff run and scores 10 goals. I don’t see why a solid PKer with his shot and ability to play with our best player is someone we want to move on from.

And he was really good on that line last night.
 

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
More than anything really, we need a bottom 6 forward to replace Bastian
Zetterlund can provide some of what Bastian did. I'm thinking the problem is more a top six winger. In my view, you have three forwards that carry almost all of the offensive burden. One more to help spread that around a bit more would be helpful.
 

bigd

Registered User
Jul 27, 2003
6,886
277
There is clearly no indication that they want him gone.

At least not before the conclusion of this year.

I don't think any of us want him back after this year, but I still stand by that our lineup is better with him in it. In 2-3 years from now? Maybe not.
After last night they are.
There is clearly no indication that they want him gone.

At least not before the conclusion of this year.

I don't think any of us want him back after this year, but I still stand by that our lineup is better with him in it. In 2-3 years from now? Maybe not.
I stand by my statement, he would be gone by now if they were offered a 1st round pick.
 

MauDevils

Registered User
Jan 11, 2009
15,635
10,856
New Jersey
Zetterlund can provide some of what Bastian did. I'm thinking the problem is more a top six winger. In my view, you have three forwards that carry almost all of the offensive burden. One more to help spread that around a bit more would be helpful.
I think net front is more of a skill than it gets credit for. There's a big difference between standing a big guy in front of the goalie and actually taking his eyes away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xirik and My3Sons

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
After last night they are.

I stand by my statement, he would be gone by now if they were offered a 1st round pick.
There was a discussion by someone in the media covering the Devils that made reference to the guys concerned that the team was shipping out anyone they could over the past few seasons. It's an easy point to rebut since the team was terrible and needed to rebuild but I also understand how constant overhaul weighs on guys like Hischier and Bratt that have been with the team as long as they have and have just seen failure outside one season. I cannot see NJ just dumping expiring vets this year for futures if the team stays competitive. It would be a terrible message to the locker room. NJ doesn't have a right handed defender to call up if Severson is moved. I'm not sure you want Bahl playing on his offside so early in his career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bleedred

Guttersniped

Satan’s Wallpaper
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
23,090
52,270
I don't want more teams in the playoffs. What's so great about having a couple of mediocre teams play a few more games? I think it would make the regular season less exciting because each point is less critical. Bringing up the past formats doesn't help the argument either...back when only a handful of teams missed the playoffs, half the league was playing for nothing by the middle of the season. That's lame.


We don’t own teams and playoff profits are pretty significant. My guess is owners are pretty unhappy that they can have good teams they spend to win on and not make it. Teams needed 100 points to make the playoffs in the East last season.

My point was that other leagues have expanded playoffs because there are more teams and having this many teams in the the NHL is pretty new.

There typically isn’t much of a difference with bubble teams in and not in the playoffs. I don’t love the idea myself either because I like four rounds of 7 game series, but I see reasons for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
We don’t own teams and playoff profits are pretty significant. My guess is owners are pretty unhappy that they can have good teams they spend to win on and not make it. Teams needed 100 points to make the playoffs in the East last season.

My point was that other leagues have expanded playoffs because there are more teams and having this many teams in the the NHL is pretty new.

There typically isn’t much of a difference with bubble teams in and not in the playoffs. I don’t love the idea myself either because I like four rounds of 7 game series, but I see reasons for it.
I can easily see a play in process. As you've noted, there are good teams with big payrolls not getting any playoff revenue. Having a few extra play in games is a blip on the radar screen. The NBA has done it and at some point you'd expect the NHL to follow along.
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
14,213
15,442
I don't want more teams in the playoffs. What's so great about having a couple of mediocre teams play a few more games? I think it would make the regular season less exciting because each point is less critical. Bringing up the past formats doesn't help the argument either...back when only a handful of teams missed the playoffs, half the league was playing for nothing by the middle of the season. That's lame.

The problem with the format now is threefold: great teams barely get rewarded for a great season, the shootout and OT are too determinative, and tanking is encouraged. I agree this new format would have problems, the biggest of which is pushing off the start of the real playoffs by several days. It may not be worth that to do this, but I don't like the fact that a team can run off a huge season and barely get anything for it except home ice advantage. Having to face a team that's played a three game playoff while you've been resting could be a nice reward. It also means that playoff position means something - you want to finish above 7th.

Tanking encouragement wouldn't decrease much, but while I love the trade deadline from a fan interest standpoint I don't think it's great for the game overall.
 
Last edited:

bigd

Registered User
Jul 27, 2003
6,886
277
There was a discussion by someone in the media covering the Devils that made reference to the guys concerned that the team was shipping out anyone they could over the past few seasons. It's an easy point to rebut since the team was terrible and needed to rebuild but I also understand how constant overhaul weighs on guys like Hischier and Bratt that have been with the team as long as they have and have just seen failure outside one season. I cannot see NJ just dumping expiring vets this year for futures if the team stays competitive. It would be a terrible message to the locker room. NJ doesn't have a right handed defender to call up if Severson is moved. I'm not sure you want Bahl playing on his offside so early in his career.
He knows he's not coming back. He's not happy being dropped to third pairing and it shows. The problem is, other teams know this too!
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,913
17,561
Victoria
f*** it, let’s unload Sevo for a first (if we can get one) and roll Bahl on the third pair. Walsh or Okhotuk can be the 7th at this point.
I don't really think there's anything to do with Severson this season. Devils are trying to make the playoffs this year. They probably shouldn't trade anyone off the team. And Severson has tanked his value this season, so I'm not sure he's pulling a 1st back.

But I do see some merit in trading him for picks, and then re-rolling those picks + Devils 1st into a good player who can help and perhaps better fits the team's needs now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
He knows he's not coming back. He's not happy being dropped to third pairing and it shows. The problem is, other teams know this too!
He has been outplayed by Marino and Hamilton. He wants to get paid, and almost certainly will. I am disappointed he's been a good soldier and will miss the team improving beyond this season. He's a better defender than he gets credit for even if his mistakes are of the gut punch variety. Hopefully he can get some other team to pay him tip top dollar for many years after this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MartyOwns

bigd

Registered User
Jul 27, 2003
6,886
277
He has been outplayed by Marino and Hamilton. He wants to get paid, and almost certainly will. I am disappointed he's been a good soldier and will miss the team improving beyond this season. He's a better defender than he gets credit for even if his mistakes are of the gut punch variety. Hopefully he can get some other team to pay him tip top dollar for many years after this one.
How do you know he's been a "good soldier"?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad