BostonDevil
Registered User
- Jun 28, 2019
- 5,237
- 6,092
I think it's been the last 3 games or so that he's really exploding in ice time.This post made me check on Jack's ice time...to my surprise he's only 56th in the league among forwards in Avg time one ice. Nico is 38th.
NHL Stats
The official source for NHL Stats including skaters, goalies, teams stats and more.www.nhl.com
Looking at his game logs I think they are doing a good job managing his time. He's got a bunch of 16/17 minute games to go along with 20+ games.I think it's been the last 3 games or so that he's really exploding in ice time.
ACTUALLY, he didn't play as much as I thought last game, but played over 22 minutes against the Rangers and 26:13 against the Islanders. That was the record long shift game.
He was down below 20 in the two games before that Islanders game though.
Score in the NHL? I'm not sure he can even get shots off in the NHL. I'm not sure he can play at all at this level.
And I'll say it again, McLeod has a higher assist/60 then Hughes this year. Guys trashing McLeod as a player while trying to shoe horn Holtz onto the top line is funny.
Makes sense that we play him more when we need a goal and less when defending a lead, given the type of player he is. The 7 minute shift was silly and headline grabbing, but I think they've done a good job keeping everyone fresh until these last few games where they've shortened the bench.Looking at his game logs I think they are doing a good job managing his time. He's got a bunch of 16/17 minute games to go along with 20+ games.
I don't know if it's management or circumstances but there seems to be some pullback in some of his games this season.
Jack Hughes 2022-23 Game Log | Hockey-Reference.com
Gamelogs for Jack Hughes for 2022-23www.hockey-reference.com
Per 60 rates is where the stat geek rubber meets the road.Your ability to take /60 rate stats to argue that someone is better or good at something is really a sight to behold.
What do you think then of Foote's potential and development? I've not seen enough to know much. Is his future in the NHL? Or is he more borderline in your view, assuming you've got a take on him.I don't believe Foote and Bastain play similar games at all.
I can’t say i know for sure but i thought foote was playing more of a checking line role in utica Last year at least.What do you think then of Foote's potential and development? I've not seen enough to know much. Is his future in the NHL? Or is he more borderline in your view, assuming you've got a take on him.
Just seems to me the shuffle ruins more lines than does good. That 4th is going to get Zero time, the 3rd line looks disjointed to me and we took goal scoring out of the top 6.
Shara probably got minimal sleep for two months and since the baby may not be sleeping at all. Do you have any idea how hard it is to grip the stick when your hands are covered in vomit and poop residue?Boq has been a disappointment this year in my eyes. I thought he had shown signs in the past, and was hoping for a continued upward trajectory towards being a solid 3rd liner.
Unfortunately it hasn't happened. Yet anyways, he has had similar slow starts the past 2 years.
Shara is in the same boat to me. Higher expectations then for Boq, but he's underperformed. And I mean that beyond point production.
If they want to try Holtz in the top 6 then the lineup should be this. Haula needs to be on that line to cover up for Holtz skating and D deficiencies.
Tatar Hischier Bratt
Haula Hughes Holtz
Sharangovich Boqvist Zetterlund
Wood McLeod Insert Anyone
When Palat is back:
Tatar Hischier Bratt
Palat Hughes Holtz
Sharangovich Haula Zetterlund
Wood McLeod Boq/Bastian
LMFAO, oops. How did I manage that.
No PK time either so we can thank Smith for keeping Jack fresh.Makes sense that we play him more when we need a goal and less when defending a lead, given the type of player he is. The 7 minute shift was silly and headline grabbing, but I think they've done a good job keeping everyone fresh until these last few games where they've shortened the bench.
Per 60 rates is where the stat geek rubber meets the road.
But I'm no one trick pony. Over the last 3 season McLeod is 6th on the team in 5v5 points. Which isn't bad considering he's been on for the 2nd most defensive faceoffs over that span.......in the entire league!! Top 10 in defensive faceoff %.
He's taken 300 more dz faceoffs then Nico who is second on the team.
He's taken nearly 300 less oz faceoffs then Hughes, while taking 550 more dz faceoffs.
It might get lost in the fact that Wood scores most of the goals, but when we talk about our 4th line as being the best in the league, we do need to acknowledge McLeod centers that line.
If I compared Mcleods passing ability to Hughes you’d have a point.No they aren't, they are full of random outliers who get boosted based on shooting luck and low ice time figures, and they are a quantity measure not a quality measure. Your use of assist/60 to argue that McLeod is a good passer is particularly bad because it assumes that all great passes end up in assists which they do not.
McLeod flipping a puck into the neutral zone for Wood to chase down isn't the same as Hughes threading a pass through 4 defenders to a wide open Bratt but they both end up as assists. Anyone with a pair of eyes can acknowledge that the passing skills of McLeod should not ever be compared to that of Hughes.
If I compared Mcleods passing ability to Hughes you’d have a point.
devilsblood said:McLeod is 3rd on the team in 5v5 assists per 60. Trailing only Nico and Bratt. Better then Hughes.
Holtz on McLeod's wing makes sense on multiple levels.
No i mean it to show a level of quality.You will try to argue that this isn't you using a statistic to argue that McLeod is better than Hughes, but again you are using an efficiency metric to in a quality discussion.
Ya, but his time comes at 6+ minute stretches at a time.This post made me check on Jack's ice time...to my surprise he's only 56th in the league among forwards in Avg time one ice. Nico is 38th.
NHL Stats
The official source for NHL Stats including skaters, goalies, teams stats and more.www.nhl.com
I know it’s a point of contention, but I agree. I think someone said Holtz has played like 6-8 minutes with Jack. He’s obviously not meant for the bottom six and he needs to be put in a position to succeed playing 15+ minutes with Jack for a few games. Put him on PP1 while they’re at it too. I know he’s undeserving of it, but either send him down or give him a fighting chance.I think if we're dropping Mercer down and putting him with Haula and Wood, which I actually kind of like tbh, I'd put Holtz with Hughes and Shara. Gives Hughes some shooters and Shara can cover some of the defensive deficiencies those two have. Holtz isn't going to do shit in 7 mins with McLeod and Boq.