Brassard is struggling and i think zucc can help.
Pouilet-Brassard-Zucc
Sorry but you just sound ridiculous. Stats don't tell the whole story. The 1st goal is not why we lost, that is what you keep ignoring. Stats are indeed facts, but the theory you are positing does not apply to this individual game. Yes, over a long period of time, be scored against first would show some indication, BUT not in this particular case.
They lost because of two bad judgements by McDonagh late in periods 2 and 3, and a terrible read by Lundqvist.
Can confirm hat judgements can occur outside of the courtroom.two bad judgements? Was the game played in a court room? The goal at the end of the second was Hank's fault; period. The goal in the 3rd was shared by McD and Girardi. It wasn't perfect, but we had the better of the chances and lost. Let's go into Montreal and steal one...for a friggin' change.
There's no way they outchanced us. Maybe their higher end chances were better than ours, however we consistently had more chances then them.
Can confirm hat judgements can occur outside of the courtroom.
Cally's chance on the doorstep, CK's breakaway and Richards' chance when he tried to pass instead of roofing the backhand were better than any chances the Debbies had. They had a few good chances from 15 - 20 feet out but we were on the doorstep with the puck more than a few times. their goals were cluster****s; pure and simple.
His seats are obstructed. He can only see the events that fit his argument.Guess you forgot Ryder's 2 golden chances, and Jagr's breakaway.
Did you move your seats between periods and only sit on the end the Rangers shot on?
Guess you forgot Ryder's 2 golden chances, and Jagr's breakaway.
Did you move your seats between periods and only sit on the end the Rangers shot on?
I'd wait for Nash to come back and put Brassard with Nash and Richards.
No way would I advocate breaking up the Zucc-Stepan-Kreider line. They're on fire.
whats brassards cap hit this year?
would be interesting seeing a point per dollar set up for this team
Then who centers Cally and Hags?
I would leave the Zucc Step Kreider Line alone. I would leave Richards centering Hags and Cally, I would let Brassard Center Nash and Pouliot. If Pouliot doesnt start to raise his game, JT gets a shot on the line.
“That’s the world I live in, as a goalie,†he said. “You can do twenty good things and one bad thing and you only talk about the bad thing. But, at the same time, I can have games where I make a mistake and we still win the game and people think I played really well. That’s my world. That’s a goalie’s world. You just have to accept it.†- Henrik Lundqvist
An important quote for all the Hank bashers on this forum.
I'm currently working on the numbers for the other currently-seeded playoff teams to see how the Rangers $2,042,532.22/point stacks up. Will post soon.
Actually that's not true if he makes a mistake we still win the game I still blame him.![]()
Guess you forgot Ryder's 2 golden chances, and Jagr's breakaway.
Did you move your seats between periods and only sit on the end the Rangers shot on?
The Queen? Even you're better than that broLet's be fair because he also left out the part about a 41 year old goalie being the best player on the ice while the da Queen stunk it up when it mattered most.
The Queen? Even you're better than that bro
The Queen? Even you're better than that bro
Maybe he meant this kind of Queen--I can see Henrik leading a chorus or two of this before he's done here.
That ones been around for a long time so I can't take credit for it.