I'm talking about in comparison to the player being offered up + how well he fills any wants/needs of the team.
He can't do what Cammalleri does (10 years Lee's senior) in 2-3 times more time at nearly the same amount of money and term, and yet it's somehow a great deal for NJ and a terrible one for NYI.
We've got Zajac if we want a pseudo 2nd-liner defensive playmaking center. No need trading a goal scorer for another third line mr dependable.
I'm a little dumbfounded about your logic behind this. If you are arguing cost vs. production vs need any which way you slice it you are ABSOLUTELY UNDENIABLY incorrect.
In fairness Anders only has two years under his belt, but here's the nitty gritty you obviously didn't research.
2015-2016 Salary PTS
Cammalleri 5 million 42
Lee 2 million 41
2015-2016
Cammalleri 5 million 38
Lee 3.5 million 36
How much each point cost their team:
Cammalleri 125k
Lee 71,428
And to your last point. Do the Islanders need another soft winger or a guy who can take the body and be a vicious presence in front of the net?
Your answers:
Pts vs money= Winner is Lee
Team need = Winner is Lee
I'd really like to see you prove all this wrong, but I don't like your chances. The only argument I can see you countering with is the quality of players....but that holds a slim margin when the differences are so big (Cammalleri woul d need to average about 60 pts a season to catch Lee in value per point and that's something he's only ever done twice in his career and the last time was 7 years ago. He certainly could have done it last year barring injury, but that in and of itself is the reason to not pick an older guy. Lee was injured too btw).