Andre Palot
Registered User
Binnington?Marty is going to reunite Binnington with Allen this offseason
Rev up the @Bleedred signal.
Binnington?Marty is going to reunite Binnington with Allen this offseason
Marty is going to reunite Binnington with Allen this offseason
1st + Nemec for 1st, Xhekaj, Anderson
1st + Nemec for 1st, Xhekaj, Anderson
That acct still exists lol woww
" but Bob said ! "Never forget the legendary Incarcerated Bob either, bub.
Hes now Hershey these daysNever forget the legendary Incarcerated Bob either, bub.
i can't believe that guy is still on twitter lol. has he ever gotten anything right?
1st + Nemec for 1st, Xhekaj, Anderson
Honestly, Binnington should be up there close to Saros, Markstrom, and Ullmark as available 1A options.Marty is going to reunite Binnington with Allen this offseason
The only deal that makes sense that would include #10 would be for a package for Brady Tkachuk on the off chance he's made available.It’s only right for Fitzgerald to dangle #10, but I just can’t fathom a deal that makes sense.
This teams main needs are a 1A goalie, middle-six forwards, and possibly a veteran second pairing defender, all of which shouldn’t cost #10. A package for #10 should be centered around getting a first pairing D or first line forward, neither of which this team has cap space or a real need for.
The only deal that makes sense that would include #10 would be for a package for Brady Tkachuk on the off chance he's made available.
100%. The 10th should be completely off the table for any of those kinds of pieces, even in a trade down.It’s only right for Fitzgerald to dangle #10, but I just can’t fathom a deal that makes sense.
This teams main needs are a 1A goalie, middle-six forwards, and possibly a veteran second pairing defender, all of which shouldn’t cost #10. A package for #10 should be centered around getting a first pairing D or first line forward, neither of which this team has cap space or a real need for.
I wouldn't trade 10th for a top pairing D man.Unless the trade target is an elite starter, top-pairing defenseman, or elite winger, the 10th should be out of the question.
....what?I wouldn't trade 10th for a top pairing D man.
It's not what we need right now. Presuming Hughes and/or Nemec become ones, I'd rather allocate our cap to other resources down the line.....what?
I mean, most people here want an upgrade on Siegs for the top-pairing, and I agree.I wouldn't trade 10th for a top pairing D man.
I think the old version of the site had a blocker that would somehow have the account name x'd out when their tweets were posted here.Didn't HF used to be a rule against posting HockeyInsiderr?