MartyOwns
thank you shero
- Apr 1, 2007
- 24,775
- 19,647
I think he was referring more to his play on the PK.Interesting. Keefe said in the post game that Haula might have played his best game this season so far
So the charts are not reflecting that.
Cue the "assume Keefe doesn't believe in those charts"
I think he was referring more to his play on the PK.
Without seeing actually statistics it certainly feels like that is true. Jack and Bratt are just relentless with how aggressive they are on the point to create turnovers for an 2 on 1 the other way.that goal today was not technically a SHG, but Jack in ~45 shorthanded minutes this year is outscoring the opposition 2 goals to 1 when he is on the ice lol
Love the dynamicWithout seeing actually statistics it certainly feels like that is true. Jack and Bratt are just relentless with how aggressive they are on the point to create turnovers for an 2 on 1 the other way.
I know there were questions today about when the team would practice next, and in the postgame video Keefe mentioned the team having 9 days off. That would put them back at practice on Tuesday 2/18.
Oh for sure, Haula was pretty bad other than the PK but I think it was mostly Keefe just trying to praise a veteran who's been out for a while and not throwing him under the bus.Oh, he was speaking about the PK before that.... Possible!
On the unrelated note, Haula still looks slow as molasses, I assume that is due to the injury and slow recovery... Foot/ankle injuries take forever to get close to 90-100% if they ever do.
As bad as him and Luke were last game it was the complete opposite in this one, pretty solid overall, they both had a couple of really nice plays breaking up what would have been other wise great chances against. Luke had a goal as well.i didn't catch the last game, or most of this game. I heard Nemec was pretty awful vs. Vegas. Did he improve today?
I’d say it was a bit of a mixed bag. Nemec was very solid positionally to my eyes and was good with carrying and passing the puck. But he stlll looked half a step too slow to react and had some struggles against the wall and with contested puck movement. Not bad on defense all things considered and good with any open space with or without thr puck .i didn't catch the last game, or most of this game. I heard Nemec was pretty awful vs. Vegas. Did he improve today?
I also don't see it with this Montreal core. I don't think they'll be a playoff team next year or even three years after that.
The team will be a handful after Demidov comes over. His ceiling is ridiculous and his play style looks more NHL-friendly than Michcov, who’s filthy but quirky.
They got a number of good center prospects too (must be nice lol).
They do have a nice young group. The girls for them will be knowing when to move on from some guys and when to add some different elements to complement their young players. As Buffalo has shown it’s difficult to just keep adding young players and hoping they can learn to compete without good veteran leadership.The team will be a handful after Demidov comes over. His ceiling is ridiculous and his play style looks more NHL-friendly than Michcov, who’s filthy but quirky.
They got a number of good center prospects too (must be nice lol).
Came here to say this. Thought Nemec was solid today.As bad as him and Luke were last game it was the complete opposite in this one, pretty solid overall, they both had a couple of really nice plays breaking up what would have been other wise great chances against. Luke had a goal as well.