Confirmed with Link: Devils acquire Meier (50% retained) and four others from the Sharks for 2023 1st, conditional 2024 1st, Mukhamadullin, Okhotiuk, Zetterlund & Johnsson

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
34,938
35,505
NJ
You obviously don't realize the Brannstrom hype in hindsight and how highly regarded he was when he was moved. People were legitimately comparing him to Erik Karlsson. We also tend to overvalue Mercer because we're attached to him. I love the player, but you have to be realistic. Some treat him like he's just a cut below Jack and Bratt.

My point is moving a guy like Mercer for a player of Meier's caliber isn't that outrageous. He just happens to be a fan favorite and on an absolute heater right now. Being cost controlled for the time being helps as well.

Mercer is a 21 year old on pace for 26 goals 54 pts with janky usage and basically no PP or secondary production.
 

ZachaFlockaFlame

Registered User
Aug 24, 2020
15,704
20,701
Trading your advantage against the Rags (since they're our R1 opponent as of now) defensively to get progressively worse is the dumbest thing you can do going into the playoffs. Flip Severson with Holtz for a better upgrade? Sure or something of that liking but to get Luke Schenn??
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hisch13r

Unknown Caller

Registered User
Apr 30, 2009
10,323
7,957
Mercer is a 21 year old on pace for 26 goals 54 pts with janky usage and basically no PP or secondary production.
And his analytics are medicore at best. [Incoming STI rant about chart boys].

I'm not trying to rip the player, I'm as big of a Mercer fan as anyone else. But to act like it would be absurd and unprecedented to trade him for a player like Timo Meier is a little disingenuous.
 

billingtons ghost

Registered User
Nov 29, 2010
10,689
7,055

I need to mention that my cover band picks a band to cover each week. Someone suggested BTO and we laughed him out of the room on the principle of cheesiness.

Best frigging time ever. The riffs, silly Canadian backing vocals. The other guitarist is now a committed fan.

Ps. Jethro Tull night also rocked. I got my wife to dust off her flute from high school. Not a euphemism nor American Pie reference. I will self impose my own ban, thanks.
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
34,938
35,505
NJ
Trading your advantage against the Rags (since they're out R1 opponent) defensively to get progressively worse is the dumbest thing you can do going into the playoffs. Flip Severson with Holtz for a better upgrade? Sure or something of that liking but to get Luke Schenn??

As much as the Sevo for 1+ and flipping that with Holtz for Chychrun is a fun idea I still don't do that. I don't want to give up Holtz for 2 years of Chychrun and especially not when D isn't an issue.
 

OmNomNom

Taco is Love, Taco is Life
Mar 3, 2011
23,214
16,230
In the Church of Salmela
And his analytics are medicore at best. [Incoming STI rant about chart boys].

I'm not trying to rip the player, I'm as big of a Mercer fan as anyone else. But to act like it would be absurd and unprecedented to trade him for a player like Timo Meier is a little disingenuous.
if he was the guy instead of zetterlund though, it would've been crazier. mercer has a very high floor and he's still so young.

but agreed, if it was like... mercer + johnsson for timo, it would've been okay value wise. just would've hurt even more imo

One thing that I don't see people talking about and it really shocks me about this trade, is what I think a major piece involved. We got rid of Andreas Johnsson. That was huge!
lowkey excited for him to get a shot in SJ
 

Unknown Caller

Registered User
Apr 30, 2009
10,323
7,957
if he was the guy instead of zetterlund though, it would've been crazier. mercer has a very high floor and he's still so young.

but agreed, if it was like... mercer + johnsson for timo, it would've been okay value wise. just would've hurt even more imo
Completely agree, I would have been shocked if they moved him and crushed because I'm attached to the player. Value wise, it really isn't that crazy though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OmNomNom

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
14,003
14,920
When Erik Brannstrom was moved he was a massive prospect. Probably more value than Mercer. When the trade went down, Brannstrom was the #19 prospect in hockey right next to Jordan Kyrou and ahead of guys like Boldy, Cozens, Ty Smith, Bouchard, Adam Boqvist, Adam Fox, and K'Andre Miller, just to name a few.

The idea that the 19th rated prospect can have more value than a D+3 2nd/3rd line forward with a year left on his ELC is just ridiculous on its face. If this were at all true, you would see teams moving guys in Mercer's spot for guys in Brannstrom's spot - not often, but sometimes. The fact that it almost never happens should tell you something.
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
34,938
35,505
NJ
The idea that the 19th rated prospect can have more value than a D+3 2nd/3rd line forward with a year left on his ELC is just ridiculous on its face. If this were at all true, you would see teams moving guys in Mercer's spot for guys in Brannstrom's spot - not often, but sometimes. The fact that it almost never happens should tell you something.

The 19th rated prospect in the Athletic's top 50 drafted prospects from 2 weeks ago was Marco Rossi. Yeah Rossi definitely has more value than Mercer lol
 

TF1970

Registered User
May 9, 2021
1,887
1,721
not sure if this was already brought up in here, but friedman on his latest 32 thoughts podcast said "i think the only thing the devils look at and say we would have liked is an extension in place. now, we'll see where that goes. i think its gonna be a bit of a challenge. but the fact is, if that is the only negative you have on sunday night, you're pretty happy with it. and you can punt this out to the offseason and see how it goes."
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
34,938
35,505
NJ
not sure if this was already brought up in here, but friedman on his latest 32 thoughts podcast said "i think the only thing the devils look at and say we would have liked is an extension in place. now, we'll see where that goes. i think its gonna be a bit of a challenge. but the fact is, if that is the only negative you have on sunday night, you're pretty happy with it. and you can punt this out to the offseason and see how it goes."

I can definitely see it being a challenge to get him for a price they'd really like. Meier has the leverage here. When teams give up all this for the player then the player is going to be in control. Also can't see how you get Bratt done before Meier because you know Bratt's going to push for the same deal. You're going to have to pay more than you'd like on both but you have to do it.
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
14,003
14,920
The 19th rated prospect in the Athletic's top 50 drafted prospects from 2 weeks ago was Marco Rossi. Yeah Rossi definitely has more value than Mercer lol

This sort of thing is why I vastly prefer, e.g. U22 lists than prospect lists, because people just get confused, not remembering that the largest data point - does this player have a history of playing in the NHL, and if so, what was it? - is largely missing from prospect discourse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: youryeah

ZachaFlockaFlame

Registered User
Aug 24, 2020
15,704
20,701
not sure if this was already brought up in here, but friedman on his latest 32 thoughts podcast said "i think the only thing the devils look at and say we would have liked is an extension in place. now, we'll see where that goes. i think its gonna be a bit of a challenge. but the fact is, if that is the only negative you have on sunday night, you're pretty happy with it. and you can punt this out to the offseason and see how it goes."

They'll eat his QO at the worse and probably extend Bratt long term if I had to make a prediction as to why they couldn't extend Meier. 10M QO isn't totally the worst but it's definitely your last resort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guttersniped

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,720
38,288
not sure if this was already brought up in here, but friedman on his latest 32 thoughts podcast said "i think the only thing the devils look at and say we would have liked is an extension in place. now, we'll see where that goes. i think its gonna be a bit of a challenge. but the fact is, if that is the only negative you have on sunday night, you're pretty happy with it. and you can punt this out to the offseason and see how it goes."
Not even slightly worried. Fitz wouldn’t have made the move if he was concerned with it. A lot of variables are in our favour.
 

glenwo2

JESPER BRATWURST
Oct 18, 2008
52,506
25,005
New Jersey(No Fanz!)
Great trade by FItz, sad to see some pieces I like go and genuinely surprised Holtz wasn't included. FWIW that was something Pagnotta "broke" yesterday and it turned out to be correct.

Hopefully Holtz takes a step this offseason and becomes an NHL contributor, he fits the team's timeline more than the 2025 1st does. He's got the skill, the NHL in 2023 is just so insanely difficult to play in, a great shot just isn't enough anymore to make the league.

Regarding the extensions, I believe Fitz will priortize AAV over term, and may even be comfortable with 4 years for Bratt/Meier. Glad he didn't break the bank on an extension and it will be a delicate process to make sure they both get wrapped up somewhat simultaneously. Worst case scenario of having to give them one year deals is not the end of the world, but obviously quite shitty. Still the fact that NJ has that leverage over them in negotiations is huge and will hopefully get them to sign at a number like 8.25m and really set this team up nicely for a 5 year stretch.
Except he's stated in the past that Term was not an issue with Bratt, and he also was quoted as saying he wants Bratt to be a Devil for a LONG TIME.

4 years is not a long time so it doesn't jive with what you said.

Signing Timo for 4 years at bigger money could work if he accepts it (yes. They have to accept the deal. That's how it works. lol ) but it's all STILL speculation at this point and we won't know until the extension(Meier) happens.

I fully expect (on the part of Bratt) for it to be 8 years (I'd be okay with 7, too).
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
34,938
35,505
NJ
Except he's stated in the past that Term was not an issue with Bratt, and he also was quoted as saying he wants Bratt to be a Devil for a LONG TIME.

4 years is not a long time so it doesn't jive with what you said.

Signing Timo for 4 years at bigger money could work if he accepts it (yes. They have to accept the deal. That's how it works. lol ) but it's all STILL speculation at this point and we won't know until the extension(Meier) happens.

I fully expect (on the part of Bratt) for it to be 8 years (I'd be okay with 7, too).

It just makes sense to give Bratt and Meier matching long term deals.
 

Saugus

Ecrasez l'infame!
Sponsor
Jun 17, 2009
105,775
13,939
Connecticut
They'll eat his QO at the worse and probably extend Bratt long term if I had to make a prediction as to why they couldn't extend Meier. 10M QO isn't totally the worst but it's definitely your last resort.

If it gets to the point of being forced to accept his QO, that's when I'll be worried. But that's unlikely. I think they will move pretty fast to get both Meier and Bratt under contract long term before the end of this upcoming offseason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: glenwo2

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,675
50,599
When Erik Brannstrom was moved he was a massive prospect. Probably more value than Mercer. When the trade went down, Brannstrom was the #19 prospect in hockey right next to Jordan Kyrou and ahead of guys like Boldy, Cozens, Ty Smith, Bouchard, Adam Boqvist, Adam Fox, and K'Andre Miller, just to name a few.

Mark Stone was traded at the Feb 2019 TDL and he didn’t have more value than Mercer.

E33F7FA2-08F7-4862-ABFF-726A7420AB3C.jpeg


You’re talking about Pronman’s best NHL Drafted Prospect list from Jan 2019.

Brannstrom was the 6th defenseman on Pronman’s list in 2019, after Q. Hughes (#1), Makar (#10), Ryan Merkley (#15), Adam Boqvist (#16) and Dobson (#18). Jordan Kyrou was actually #6.

There aren’t a ton of big names after him other than some guys that fell threw the cracks (Norris at #35, Farabee at #39, Fox at #44, K’Andre Miller at #47). Bode Wilde is #21. It’s a prospect list.

Mercer is 45th on Pronman’s latest Best U23 list, which unlike the 2019 list includes NHLers.
Jack is #2, Luke is #14, Nemec is #40, Mukhamadullin is #68, Holtz is #72, Foote is #132 and Gritsyuk is #147.

Playing and producing in the NHL as well as he does now matters a whole lot. Brännström obviously had a good amount of value, that’s why they only had to give up a 2nd with him for Stone.

Mercer for Meier was never happening, that’s the difference here.


 

Devils731

Registered User
Jun 23, 2008
12,948
18,414
And his analytics are medicore at best. [Incoming STI rant about chart boys].

I'm not trying to rip the player, I'm as big of a Mercer fan as anyone else. But to act like it would be absurd and unprecedented to trade him for a player like Timo Meier is a little disingenuous.
03BA9495-27A7-460F-8E83-7698DCBA8284.png


This high level card doesn’t look mediocre. Once you combine the actual results with age and contract, you come out with someone who has very high value.
 

Classic Devil

Spirit of 1988
Dec 23, 2003
39,365
4,094
Columbus, Ohio
And his analytics are medicore at best. [Incoming STI rant about chart boys].

I'm not trying to rip the player, I'm as big of a Mercer fan as anyone else. But to act like it would be absurd and unprecedented to trade him for a player like Timo Meier is a little disingenuous.
Look at Mercer vs. Meier at the same age.
 

Bleedred

#FIREDAVEROGALSKI
Sponsor
May 1, 2011
133,231
62,582
Look at Mercer vs. Meier at the same age.
Yup

I remember arguing back in 2017 and maybe even in 2018 in defense of Zacha that he had been better than Meier so far at that point. What a difference 5-6 years makes.

Timo really broke out in 18-19 at age 22 and also received a big bump in ice time starting that year.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad