13BearerOfHope
Hoppsassa Gügüü
- Oct 12, 2019
- 434
- 377
Anyone comparing this to the Mueller trade are out to lunch for so many reasons it's absurd. Not even remotely the same.
That's just not true, not wanting to trade NHL players + picks for marginal upgrade or trading a ton of assets for big upgrades while creating more holes is entirely different then trading a 3rd round pick for a guy that has NHL experience and would be playing if it wasn't for Chara.Context, unfortunately, isn’t something that’s looked at most of the time and I couldn’t agree with you more then I do now but you do have to laugh at the fact that the majority weren’t willing to trade for a player in the same age bracket, with several of our armchair GM proposals of the last 7 days or so. Now that it actually went down, you see a complete 180 in what was a mindset that you load up on picks and add players for free via free agency or waivers.
With that said, I hope this kid turns out as a solid bottom pairing dman because we all know that adding size and strength to our blueline was something that needed to be addressed.
There is a 14% (CORRECTION: 27% APOLOGIES) chance that a 3rd round pick turns into a NHL player with >99 games.
I say giving up a 3rd rounder for a young D-man who has been able to get ice time on the WSH Capitals is a pretty fine deal.
Source:
NHL Draft Pick Probabilities
Subban is leaned on pretty heavily by NJ. If the plan is to leave him unprotected, then there better be a plan to replace what he brings.Yeah, they can expose Subban, if there is a good opportunity to add another defender. Subban has been fairly good this season, but it's not the biggest thing if the Kraken selects him.
I think this trade indicates the Devils do not see him as a tweener. He might be a 2-3 year stop gap until the recent draft picks are ready, but a pretty safe bet he is a regular for the rest of this year(once we trade Kulikov) and next year.Useful to see the pick success rate.
But it should be noted that Siegenthaler is no longer exempt from waivers, and that’s why I don’t love this deal.
Imo, it’s pretty likely there will be some tweeners like Siegenthaler on the waiver wire in preseason. Yes, there will be fewer because of Seattle. But, deeper teams will still have these issues.
Hopefully this is a Kuokkannen situation where the Devils really liked the player vs Mueller where it seemed the Devils were being opportunistic / betting on a rebound. Unfortunately, Siegenthaler has been press boxed most of the year, so likely hard to have gotten a read on him.
Not sure if it's been mentioned but one thing Siegenthaler was called on to do in Wash was kill penalties.
Team leader last year at 3:10 minutes per game played.
Yeah I would think the team leader in PK minutes would have something to do with that.And Washington was 6th in the league last year in PK. You got to figure Siegenthaler had something to do with that.
What prospects was he passed by. My understanding was that they brought in some guy named Zdeno Chara who pushed him out of the lineup. Also traded for Brendan Dillon last trade season and resigned him in the offseason if I’m not mistaken.the comparisons to mueller are because this is another guy who was the odd defenseman out after getting passed by other prospects, we traded a pick to get him, and if memory serves both deals were right before an expansion draft. nobody is comparing the 2 players or the 2 deals specifically...it's not that difficult to understand.
we did a similar thing with palms & a similar thing with johnsson. personally, i think it's pretty smart to look for guys who are being underutilized and getting them at a relatively low cost. some will work out, some won't, but it's definitely preferable to overpaying a guy in UFA who won't be worth his massive contract 2 years after the ink dries on the contract (for example)
That's just not true, not wanting to trade NHL players + picks for marginal upgrade or trading a ton of assets for big upgrades while creating more holes is entirely different then trading a 3rd round pick for a guy that has NHL experience and would be playing if it wasn't for Chara.
What prospects was he passed by. My understanding was that they brought in some guy named Zdeno Chara who pushed him out of the lineup. Also traded for Brendan Dillon last trade season and resigned him in the offseason if I’m not mistaken.
Edit: I don’t consider Chara or Dillon to be prospects which I think is pretty fair.
He had two very good years before this season but was pushed out of the lineup by additions of Chara and Dillon. Has played 97 games in the league and been solid in those games. It sounds like the capitals may have gotten rid of him to make room for another addition.For a team looking to repeat, one would think that they would rather have a guy with NHL experience over a random pick, if ever someone on the left side of their defence would go down with an injury, wouldn’t you think?
If it works out in our favour, that’s all that matters but I have my doubts. My point has always been to add proven talent for future assets such as picks and prospects. I don’t think the player we acquired is proven and adding that 3rd to a top prospect could’ve been of better use to land a top #6 forward, also in that same age group.
Ya I don’t know what they would be talking about. The caps have played 8 d this year. The 3 LD that have played besides him are Orlov, Dillon and Chara so it’s pretty easy to see why he hasn’t gotten in the lineup. None of the 8 d are young prospect d.i don't know, i'm just going off of caps fans reactions on the main board and elsewhere. in fairness, they may just be trying to justify the move, as fans do.
He got replace by big Z its that simple.For a team looking to repeat, one would think that they would rather have a guy with NHL experience who’s apparently solid on PK over a random pick, if ever someone on the left side of their defence would go down with an injury, wouldn’t you think?
If it works out in our favour, that’s all that matters but I have my doubts. My point has always been to add proven talent for future assets such as picks and prospects. I don’t think the player we acquired is proven and adding that 3rd to a top prospect could’ve been of better use to land us a top #6 forward/2nd pairing dman, also in that same age group.
This is wrong.the comparisons to mueller are because this is another guy who was the odd defenseman out after getting passed by other prospects, we traded a pick to get him, and if memory serves both deals were right before an expansion draft. nobody is comparing the 2 players or the 2 deals specifically...it's not that difficult to understand.
we did a similar thing with palms & a similar thing with johnsson. personally, i think it's pretty smart to look for guys who are being underutilized and getting them at a relatively low cost. some will work out, some won't, but it's definitely preferable to overpaying a guy in UFA who won't be worth his massive contract 2 years after the ink dries on the contract (for example)
For a team looking to repeat, one would think that they would rather have a guy with NHL experience who’s apparently solid on PK over a random pick, if ever someone on the left side of their defence would go down with an injury, wouldn’t you think?
If it works out in our favour, that’s all that matters but I have my doubts. My point has always been to add proven talent for future assets such as picks and prospects. I don’t think the player we acquired is proven and adding that 3rd to a top prospect could’ve been of better use to land us a top #6 forward/2nd pairing dman, also in that same age group.
Useful to see the pick success rate.
But it should be noted that Siegenthaler is no longer exempt from waivers, and that’s why I don’t love this deal.
Imo, it’s pretty likely there will be some tweeners like Siegenthaler on the waiver wire in preseason. Yes, there will be fewer because of Seattle. But, deeper teams will still have these issues.
Hopefully this is a Kuokkannen situation where the Devils really liked the player vs Mueller where it seemed the Devils were being opportunistic / betting on a rebound. Unfortunately, Siegenthaler has been press boxed most of the year, so likely hard to have gotten a read on him.
the comparisons to mueller are because this is another guy who was the odd defenseman out after getting passed by other prospects, we traded a pick to get him, and if memory serves both deals were right before an expansion draft. nobody is comparing the 2 players or the 2 deals specifically...it's not that difficult to understand.
we did a similar thing with palms & a similar thing with johnsson. personally, i think it's pretty smart to look for guys who are being underutilized and getting them at a relatively low cost. some will work out, some won't, but it's definitely preferable to overpaying a guy in UFA who won't be worth his massive contract 2 years after the ink dries on the contract (for example)
And team control is totally a thing. Say what you will about the Mueller trade, Mirco played on the team for three years and was a RFA we didn’t give a qualifying offer to. Someone had to play defense on that team.Murray is a sneeze away from being on the IR for a month and Kulikov is "old".
We picked up a young, cost controlled NHL defender that much better fits the timeline and doesn't have a history of injuries. Of course the price was going to be higher. But what are the chances that 3rd would have even yielded an NHL player? Quite low. I don't like the idea of a rebuilding team throwing picks around frivolously, but I think this is a pretty smart move.
Who said 3rd rounders were solid gold?A day ago draft picks were solid gold. Funny how that fluctuates.