GameSeven
ἢ τὰς ἢ ἐπὶ τὰς
- Jan 11, 2008
- 4,615
- 2,549
Not sure if joking, but OP most likely talking about Boqvist family, here.I didn't know Tom had a brother in the NHL?
Not sure if joking, but OP most likely talking about Boqvist family, here.I didn't know Tom had a brother in the NHL?
To be fair, we need some bottom 6 guys who can play the game. We have enough top 6 or bust guys. Depending on how you view the 3rd line at least.I don't think very highly of Merkley, he might be a decent bottom-6 option but I suspect he won't be in the organization longer than a year or two.
I think he's weird...I think his talent is limited and best suited as a bottom 6 player.I thought Merkley looked great up until that pretty gruesome injury.
I wasn't joking...Just a little slowNot sure if joking, but OP most likely talking about Boqvist family, here.
Sort of how I see it too.I don't think very highly of Merkley, he might be a decent bottom-6 option but I suspect he won't be in the organization longer than a year or two.
I wasn't joking...Just a little slow
I think Kuokkanen gets a long look....partly because of the expansion draft next year. He would need to be protected and I am not sure how many actual decent pieces we will have available, so they might want to see if he is worthy. Not to mention, he doesn't have much else to prove in the AHL.
as it stands now, our forward protection list is pretty thin....especially if Palms/Zajac are gone. Remember, Hughes and Gusev are both exempt.
I know that Merkley requires waivers to be sent down, so that gives him an advantage in making the team out of camp. Does anybody know the waiver status on the rest of these guys?
LeBrun: NHL GMs call likely to focus on season logistics, AHL start date
Says the NHL and NHLPA have generally agreed to allowing the 7 non-qualifying teams to have training camp start early and maybe enjoy some extra preseason games. Nothing concrete yet though.
Why would Zajac be gone?I think Kuokkanen gets a long look....partly because of the expansion draft next year. He would need to be protected and I am not sure how many actual decent pieces we will have available, so they might want to see if he is worthy. Not to mention, he doesn't have much else to prove in the AHL.
as it stands now, our forward protection list is pretty thin....especially if Palms/Zajac are gone. Remember, Hughes and Gusev are both exempt.
Why would Zajac be gone?
I didnt realize his deal was up! ThoughI full well expect him to get a 1-2 year cheap deal as our main veteran in the bottom-6because his contract is up after this year and he is going to be 36 years old?
Looking at Capfriendly seems like Kuokkanen and McLeod are waivers exempt, Bastian is not. That surprised me because I thought I remembered hearing that one reason Carolina included Kuokkanen is because was losing his waivers exempt status.
I didnt realize his deal was up! ThoughI full well expect him to get a 1-2 year cheap deal as our main veteran in the bottom-6
He is still too good defensively and in the locker room to just let go. He would retire a Devil if he could choose and I feel he will get the chance to after another year or two
If he were to leave (as well as Palmieri at the deadline) wed have no forward on the roster over the age of 28. Not to mention I think he can and has been great for Nico and maybe Jack as well
I thought the comments were teams called on him and Fitzgerald asked if he would, and Travis said hed prefer to stay and Tom had no problem with itI love Zajac as much as the next fan but the fact that they tried to trade him last year makes me question if this management would even be looking to extend him.
I thought the comments were teams called on him and Fitzgerald asked if he would, and Travis said hed prefer to stay and Tom had no problem with it
Maybe I misunderstood
You misunderstood.I thought the comments were teams called on him and Fitzgerald asked if he would, and Travis said hed prefer to stay and Tom had no problem with it
Maybe I misunderstood
So the more I read, I'm seeing a trade with Tampa for Killorn and Cernak as a distinct possibility. If we did get Killorn, would you guys put him on the 1st line? How would you see the lines shaking out in general?
I don't know, I don't think that necessarily is us trying to trade him but rather he, we got this, what do you want to do?You misunderstood.
n an additional report from Sportsnet’s Elliotte Friedman, the Devils, at some point, gave Zajac the opportunity to move in a deal, but his agent, Kurt Overhardt, told Sportsnet Zajac opted to use his full no-trade clause to remain in New Jersey.
“We were presented with something, but Travis was not willing to waive at this time," Overhardt told Sportsnet. "We’ll see about the future after the season.”
NHL rumors: Did Devils’ Travis Zajac turn down trade?