Detroit Redwings Downfall

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dbarthnek96
  • Start date Start date
Being a hockey GM in a no-tax state is just damn easier. That’s the big takeaway from the “Yzerplan” v.2.0.
And this hot take has been shot down so many times it's bizarre you're still trying to keep it afloat.

Just an FYI, MI has a flat state tax of 4.25%. Mind you, home game tax rates only apply to games played at home.

Lose this lame ass narrative because it just shows your ignorance.
 
Show me other teams that win anything significant with undersized wingers making 8 million or more. Just doesnt happen. Debrincat finally had a great year, good for him they still missed. He was terrible in Ottawa. He wasnt great last year in Detroit. Its not a philosophy I abide by. Historically its not a recipe for success.
Kucherov and Kane say hello, members of the 2 most decorated teams in recent history.
 
And this hot take has been shot down so many times it's bizarre you're still trying to keep it afloat.

Just an FYI, MI has a flat state tax of 4.25%. Mind you, home game tax rates only apply to games played at home.

Lose this lame ass narrative because it just shows your ignorance.

Regardless of tax, definitely easier to attract cheaper free agents to Florida than it is to Detroit.

Sunshine and beaches vs winter and being close to Toronto, I'll take Florida every time.
 
Regardless of tax, definitely easier to attract cheaper free agents to Florida than it is to Detroit.

Sunshine and beaches vs winter and being close to Toronto, I'll take Florida every time.
Florida and Tampa are also more successful lately. Free agents weren’t going to Miami or Tampa in the 90s. It’s possible that players nowadays have different motivations than in prior eras but until Florida and Tampa become bad teams, we won’t know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SantosHalper
Regardless of tax, definitely easier to attract cheaper free agents to Florida than it is to Detroit.

Sunshine and beaches vs winter and being close to Toronto, I'll take Florida every time.
When Det was contending, they really didn't have issue with signing UFAs. How competitive a team is seems to play a much bigger role than anything else.
 
Yzerman lucked out on some home run picks. Pure fluke.

Namestknov before Kucherov
Kookoek before Vasi
DeAngelo, Masin, and Macleod before Brayden Point

I say the same thing about Hughes and Hutson. Pure luck he was still there at 62 and obviously they didn't value him higher than Mesar and Beck.
Some people are giving you a hard time for this but I get what you mean. Those picks are more lucky because the players drafted before them aren't nearly as good, therefore the right pick would have been to pick the better player earlier, but for example Dallas drafting Robertson after drafting Heiskanen and Oettinger makes him a great pick because both are excellent picks so they never truly had the chance until their third pick.

But on the other hand, teams have an idea of what other teams target so they can delay picking a certain player even if it's risky. Also, scouting is far from an exact science so even though these players turned out extremely well, they still had a chance to not turn out as good. What if Point never improved his skating or what if Hutson didn't grow an extra 2 inches... this is the risk management they have to deal with, hence why some stars are picked much later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulysses31
Do people really believe in a "building through the draft exclusively" strategy?

It sounds absurd. Prospects, by definition, are an uncertain thing. A GM that leans so heavily on the draft, forfeits willingly the value of draft picks and pre-bust stage prospects as trade currency. He also limits himself in terms of team building, because he has limited control over which prospects (in terms of position, style etc.) develop into NHL players.

Not here to offer my opinion on Yzerman one way or the other. Just this one aspect that was brought up in this thread, which doesn't make sense to me. It really sounds more like a PR effort to cover for bad signings/trades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Czechboy
There was no cap, when FA’s went to the wings late in their careers.
When guys went to Detroit in the no cap era you thought it was for money? You really think the 2002 team was for money?


We also picked up some good players during the cap around the 08 team. So you're wrong.
 
When guys went to Detroit in the no cap era you thought it was for money? You really think the 2002 team was for money?


We also picked up some good players during the cap around the 08 team. So you're wrong.
The wings spending at the time was nearly double what the cap ended being a few years later. Sure they had a good team, but they were among top spenders then.
 
And this hot take has been shot down so many times it's bizarre you're still trying to keep it afloat.

Just an FYI, MI has a flat state tax of 4.25%. Mind you, home game tax rates only apply to games played at home.

Lose this lame ass narrative because it just shows your ignorance.
You seem very defensive. All I need to know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkusNaslund19
50 goal pace
41 goals
27 goals
27 goals
38 goal pace

Yeah real awful stuff. And he’s locked in a whopping 2 more years. Boy, they’ll really struggle to get out of that one if they want to.


A trade is allowed to be good for both parties. I also think it’s premature for Sens fans to talk about their team not needing a ~40 goal scorer. You’re in the wildcards, not sitting in a divisional seed about to go for the threepeat.
You keep saying I am obsessed with the player but you keep the conversation going. I also said it ended up being a win win trade for both teams and at the time I thought that Detroit took the sens to the woodshed. Staios did a great job cleaning up one of many of Dorions mess's. Dorion is a terrible GM had he been gone 2 years earlier Ottawa would be in a way better situatoin. That being said I still wouldnt build a team in a cap world with this type of player at 9.5% of the cap and thats what he signed for at the time for 4 years.

In his last 6 seasons he has had.

18 goals
32 (in 52 games best year for him)
41
27
27
35

In those seasons he was

-10
+3
-13
-31
+1
-15

He is a minus player not its not the be all and end all stat but he doesn't drive play at 5 on 5. In the right situation he is a good fit at the right cap hit. I think if you are relying on him as a top player; your team ends up exactly where Detroit is. Not bad enough to be really bad but not good enough to be a playoff team. In the meaty middle.

Now he has certainly played better in Detroit than Ottawa. But if a player mails it in at this level playing in the best league in the world I am not sure you want a guy in your locker room that has that in him. Even if you dont want to be there, its disrespectful to the game and your peers. I wonder about how competitive a person is if they are capable of that in this sport.

I know this likely enrages many of you guys and I am not trying to get anyone going. This is my perspective on how I would build a team and how I evaluate how competitive players are which is also a major component to how I would build a team.

I think Detroit will have a top 5 D core in the very near future. Building from the back end out is also how I would build a team. I think they are on the right track, they need to find a way to get another 1A/1B center and a starting goalie. Once they do that they will be a contender and consistent playoff team. Raymond reminds me so much of Alfredsson they have great pieces. I think though that Yzerman needs to not just plug holes with veterans the way he has done. A different strategy is needed.

Kucherov and Kane say hello, members of the 2 most decorated teams in recent history.
Kucherov and Kane are not undersized im talking small. They are also all world players I dont think you believe that Debrincat is in the same category as them do you?
That's what I believe too, until proven wrong.
Hard to come to grips with that Ottawa is good eh. Too bad, I have no issue with Toronto and Montreal being good as a sens fan and if Detroit was good too I wouldnt be in denial.
 
Kucherov and Kane say hello, members of the 2 most decorated teams in recent history.
Kucherov and Kane are Hall of Fame elite greats. Debrincat is a completely different type of (and level of) player. He’s a complimentary piece who I like. He can score annd plays with some snarl. I just don’t think he’s a core player.
 
Do you have anything meaningful to add to the overall convo or just aiming for ignore lists?
He’s an average/okay GM, not great, not terrible. It’s easier to attract UFA’s and get players to waive NTC/NMC’s to states like Florida and Texas, all other things being equal. I trust that didn’t offend your sensibilities too much.
 
Being a hockey GM in a no-tax state is just damn easier. That’s the big takeaway from the “Yzerplan” v.2.0.

Right... Because Yzerman's done a terrible job with the Larkin/Seider/Raymond contracts without the tax advantages. :help:

The takeaway is that Yzerman's Achilles' Heel is his pro scouting.
 
And this hot take has been shot down so many times it's bizarre you're still trying to keep it afloat.

Just an FYI, MI has a flat state tax of 4.25%. Mind you, home game tax rates only apply to games played at home.

Lose this lame ass narrative because it just shows your ignorance.

Agreed.

Winnipeg is 1st in the NHL, and is the smallest. least desirable city for young millionaires to live in, and has high taxes (less than only Montreal and Vancouver).

Having great management is more important than being in a no tax state. No tax has advantages, and some teams are successful (Florida, Tampa, Dallas), others not so much (Nashville).
 
  • Like
Reactions: dekelikekocur
He’s an average/okay GM, not great, not terrible. It’s easier to attract UFA’s and get players to waive NTC/NMC’s to states like Florida and Texas, all other things being equal. I trust that didn’t offend your sensibilities too much.
Your take on Florida is completely off otherwise it'd of been easier since the cap was instituted, both teams got much better before they started signing UFAs that weren't headed for the tail of their career. Cap has been in place 20 years now is it? So what's the excuse for the first 14 or 15 years? Or Dallas's excuse? And as Zenator mentioned, What's Nashville's excuse?

Yea, no state income tax isn't a crutch for an argument, it's an excuse fans of other teams use to cope with their team sucking.
 
Agreed.

Winnipeg is 1st in the NHL, and is the smallest. least desirable city for young millionaires to live in, and has high taxes (less than only Montreal and Vancouver).

Having great management is more important than being in a no tax state. No tax has advantages, and some teams are successful (Florida, Tampa, Dallas), others not so much (Nashville).
Hehe, I had actually forgotten Nashville existed.
 
Kucherov and Kane are Hall of Fame elite greats. Debrincat is a completely different type of (and level of) player. He’s a complimentary piece who I like. He can score annd plays with some snarl. I just don’t think he’s a core player.
I agree with you but having Cat isn't hurting Detroit by any means, i'm not sure why he's pointed at as a problem when he's definitely A solution and his salary isn't anything outrageous.
 
And this hot take has been shot down so many times it's bizarre you're still trying to keep it afloat.

Just an FYI, MI has a flat state tax of 4.25%. Mind you, home game tax rates only apply to games played at home.

Lose this lame ass narrative because it just shows your ignorance.
I agree that the tax thing is a lame excuse. It didn't start popping up until the FLA teams started doing well, only five years ago.

Where were these whiners when Chicago/LA/Pittsburgh/etc. were winning?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Nogatco

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad