Detroit Redwings Downfall

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dbarthnek96
  • Start date Start date
  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server
10x better when they are playing .200 hockey? Only team with a worse last ten games is Philly at 1-8-1. Weird you don't care. Pretty sure this is the worst they have been all season. Including under Lalonde. Which is why I asked how many 2-8 runs Lalonde had.
It’s hard to prove with analytics, but in a handful of those games, they played against a hot goaltender who stole the show.

It should have been more like a 5-5 run which still isn’t very good.

I know the other side of the argument is that the team doesn’t have enough skill/goal scorers, but they heavily outplayed a few of the teams they lost to during that skid and had 0 points to show.

Unless you’re constantly watching the wings (which usually means you are a fan), it’s hard to understand what’s going on and easy to say that these guys just suck regardless of who is behind the net, but under Todd they have had a lot more hustle vs Lalonde.

Lalonde’s stay was long overdue.

Nonetheless it will be disappointing if they miss out again this year. Lots of missed opportunities which happens when a team is rebuilding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Czechboy
...the Oilers Culture Problem thread is still on Page One here as well...people bitch and poke here...it's just Detroit's turn in the barrel atm...it'll turn to some other team soon... :thumbu:
God help me if the Sens go on a skid before the season's out, that'll definitely drag the 'Is Ottawa good' thread back to the top of the board.
 
God help me if the Sens go on a skid before the season's out, that'll definitely drag the 'Is Ottawa good' thread back to the top of the board.

...when the Habs miss, and I think we will, the "Slaf is a BUST" threads will return as well...just the way this place is...

circleoflife.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Leto
Wings drafted Larkin 11 years ago

Are you alluding to that's when DRWs rebuild "officially" started? Larkin was drafted 15th overall. Then drafts after him were 19th and 20th the following two years.

Weird rebuttal.

Montreal& Columbus started their rebuild after Detroit, yet they are already at the same spot as Detroit and their future looks brighter

But but but…..

Tampa was also already a top tier team way before 2020.. They were in the finals in 2015 against Chicago
Chicago was at the bottom in -06 and -07 and won the Cup 2010

We aren’t even talking about Cup here, Detroit can’t even get into the playoffs with half of the East being garbage. Year 6 is coming to an end with mastermind Steve Y and absolutely nothing to show for it


Let’s be real — rebuild timelines in the NHL aren’t linear, and comparing Detroit's path directly to Montreal or Columbus is overly simplistic and ignores key context.

First off —​

Unlike Montreal or Columbus, the Red Wings were coming off a 25-year playoff streak that left them with:
  • No high-end prospects
  • Aging contracts (Abdelkader, Nielsen, Ericsson, etc.)
  • A cupboard completely bare due to late draft picks and minimal prospect development under Ken Holland's final years
When Steve Yzerman came in, it wasn’t a matter of “tweaking” — it was a scorched-earth rebuild starting from near zero.

Meanwhile:​

  • Montreal lucked into Cole Caufield and Slafkovsky, and made a fluke run to the Cup Final in a COVID-shortened season with Carey Price playing out of his mind.
  • Columbus? They’ve got talent, sure — but are they actually ahead of Detroit? They’ve been dead last in the East previous years and recently fired a coach mid '24. They also took big swings in free agency that haven’t fully panned out.
Neither team has done anything Detroit hasn't — and in fact, Detroit has more stability and structure moving forward.

On Yzerman: You want to fire the guy who built Tampa?​

Tampa’s Cups in 2020 and 2021 were built entirely off his drafting and development:
  • Kucherov
  • Point
  • Vasilevskiy
  • Cirelli
  • Sergachev (traded for Drouin)
  • Killorn, Palat, Hedman (held over)
He didn’t luck into a super team — he built it patiently. Detroit is just now starting to see those same results:
  • Seider, Raymond, Edvinsson, Kasper, Danielson, Cossa, Lombardi, Mazur — a pipeline with legitimate depth
  • They’re also near the playoff bubble in the hardest division in hockey and doing it with the youngest team in the league outside of rebuilding squads

And the “half of the East is garbage” line?​

That’s revisionist nonsense. The East is stacked with teams like:
  • Boston (historic pace last year)
  • Florida (Cup Finalist)
  • Toronto, Tampa, NYR, NJ, Buffalo (trending up), Ottawa (loaded with talent)
Detroit clawing their way into contention in that field is not insignificant.

Final thought:​

Rebuilds don’t always bear fruit by Year 6 — especially when you start from absolute zero like Detroit did. But right now:
  • They’re competitive
  • They’re deep in prospects
  • They have cap flexibility
  • And they’re being built by one of the most respected GMs in hockey
It’s fair to expect more by now — but saying they have “nothing to show for it” is just lazy. The foundation is there. The next step is coming.
 
Last edited:
Are you alluding to that's when DRWs rebuild "officially" started? Larkin was drafted 15th overall. Then drafts after him were 19th and 20th the following two years.

Weird rebuttal.




Let’s be real — rebuild timelines in the NHL aren’t linear, and comparing Detroit's path directly to Montreal or Columbus is overly simplistic and ignores key context.

First off —​

Unlike Montreal or Columbus, the Red Wings were coming off a 25-year playoff streak that left them with:
  • No high-end prospects
  • Aging contracts (Abdelkader, Nielsen, Ericsson, etc.)
  • A cupboard completely bare due to late draft picks and minimal prospect development under Ken Holland's final years
When Steve Yzerman came in, it wasn’t a matter of “tweaking” — it was a scorched-earth rebuild starting from near zero.

Meanwhile:​

  • Montreal lucked into Cole Caufield and Slafkovsky, and made a fluke run to the Cup Final in a COVID-shortened season with Carey Price playing out of his mind.
  • Columbus? They’ve got talent, sure — but are they actually ahead of Detroit? They’ve been dead last in the East previous years and recently fired a coach mid '24. They also took big swings in free agency that haven’t fully panned out.
Neither team has done anything Detroit hasn't — and in fact, Detroit has more stability and structure moving forward.

On Yzerman: You want to fire the guy who built Tampa?​

Tampa’s Cups in 2020 and 2021 were built entirely off his drafting and development:
  • Kucherov
  • Point
  • Vasilevskiy
  • Cirelli
  • Sergachev (traded for Drouin)
  • Killorn, Palat, Hedman (held over)
He didn’t luck into a super team — he built it patiently. Detroit is just now starting to see those same results:
  • Seider, Raymond, Edvinsson, Kasper, Danielson, Cossa, Lombardi, Mazur — a pipeline with legitimate depth
  • They’re also near the playoff bubble in the hardest division in hockey and doing it with the youngest team in the league outside of rebuilding squads

And the “half of the East is garbage” line?​

That’s revisionist nonsense. The East is stacked with teams like:
  • Boston (historic pace last year)
  • Florida (Cup Finalist)
  • Toronto, Tampa, NYR, NJ, Buffalo (trending up), Ottawa (loaded with talent)
Detroit clawing their way into contention in that field is not insignificant.

Final thought:​

Rebuilds don’t always bear fruit by Year 6 — especially when you start from absolute zero like Detroit did. But right now:
  • They’re competitive
  • They’re deep in prospects
  • They have cap flexibility
  • And they’re being built by one of the most respected GMs in hockey
It’s fair to expect more by now — but saying they have “nothing to show for it” is just lazy. The foundation is there. The next step is coming.
I liked your post. Gives a decent picture of Detroit's rebuild for me who doesn't follow closely. Who did you mean when you wrote about Reinbacher? Because that is definitely not a wings prospect.
 
Yzerman had to scorch earth when he arrived.

Imagine a world where he had some of these kids from KH years:

  • Brock Boeser (23rd overall instead of bust Svechnikov 19th)
  • Chychrun instead of Cholowski (traded DET 1st in Datsyuk trade)
  • Suzuki or Necas instead of Rasmussen
  • Q. Hughes instead Zadina (who I thought was a KH's "kid". I was sure was taking Hughes!, then he didn't) - i wanted Dobson.
Then throw in a couple late round gems Ken Holland missed on: Drake Batherson; Jesper Bratt; Viktor Arvidsson; Montour....

What would DRWs look like right now had SFY inherited at least some of those guys?

Nope, he got Larkin and Hronrek and a TON of bad contracts and negative assets.
 
It’s pretty easy. Their downfall was thinking that they were getting a brilliant GM and a stone cold negotiator.

When they just got a guy who exploited the no state tax advantage.

Take that away and he clearly isnt good at this.
 
It’s pretty easy. Their downfall was thinking that they were getting a brilliant GM and a stone cold negotiator.

When they just got a guy who exploited the no state tax advantage.

Take that away and he clearly isnt good at this.

Didn't he just lock up both Raymond and Seider to pretty solid deals? Pot holes and ALL! That's pretty "stone cold"/=
 
  • Like
Reactions: nbwingsfan
I don’t think that’s correct. His UFA signings and some of his trades were premature but made the Wings “better” enough to ruin their chances for top 3-5 picks in the last few drafts, which they needed . . . and still need.
Which UFA signings and trades would have brought us down to 3rd overall over the last 2-3 years?

The UFA signings if anything have mostly helped us lose they’ve been so bad lol.

And Debrincat is the only real trade he’s done, and you’d be very lucky to have a 30+ goal guy at picks 3-5
 
Are you alluding to that's when DRWs rebuild "officially" started? Larkin was drafted 15th overall. Then drafts after him were 19th and 20th the following two years.
You have a horrible habit of using one timeframe for the redwings and a different one for everyone else. The post I quoted using drafting of a key player as “start date” and winning a cup as end date. This is faulty for multiple reasons and so I used an analogous important piece for red wings who will either need to be replaced or fingers crossed ages as well as one can hope given the ever shifting “timeline”. The main facts are the red wings have not made the playoffs since 2015-16 and have not won a playoff series since 2012-13. They’ve been about as slow a rebuild as one can imagine.
 
You have a horrible habit of using one timeframe for the redwings and a different one for everyone else. The post I quoted using drafting of a key player as “start date” and winning a cup as end date. This is faulty for multiple reasons and so I used an analogous important piece for red wings who will either need to be replaced or fingers crossed ages as well as one can hope given the ever shifting “timeline”. The main facts are the red wings have not made the playoffs since 2015-16 and have not won a playoff series since 2012-13. They’ve been about as slow a rebuild as one can imagine.

Does 25 straight playoff appearances factor in to how long their rebuild may take?

When comparing other rebuilding teams (OTT, BUF), they have pretty much sucked since the dawn of time and had more trade capital/assets.

I concede that KH missed on every 1st round draft pick since 2015/16, and only found a few meh guys in later rounds.

Everything he has done was "wasted years" that shouldn't be put on Yzerman's more methodical rebuild approach.
 
Wings drafted Larkin 11 years ago
But it wasn't the start of their rebuild.
The post I quoted using drafting of a key player as “start date” and winning a cup as end date. This is faulty for multiple reasons
Though you didn't change it to provide other starting times. Chicago was most likely earlier.
Montreal& Columbus started their rebuild after Detroit, yet they are already at the same spot as Detroit and their future looks brighter

But but but…..
As Dotter mentioned, rebuilds aren't linear. It depends a bit on what prospects they draft and their projection + what gets picked up along the way through free agency and trade, as well as starting point.
Are you alluding to that's when DRWs rebuild "officially" started? Larkin was drafted 15th overall. Then drafts after him were 19th and 20th the following two years.

Weird rebuttal.
Yes agreed.
Let’s be real — rebuild timelines in the NHL aren’t linear, and comparing Detroit's path directly to Montreal or Columbus is overly simplistic and ignores key context.

First off —​

Unlike Montreal or Columbus, the Red Wings were coming off a 25-year playoff streak that left them with:
  • No high-end prospects
  • Aging contracts (Abdelkader, Nielsen, Ericsson, etc.)
  • A cupboard completely bare due to late draft picks and minimal prospect development under Ken Holland's final years
When Steve Yzerman came in, it wasn’t a matter of “tweaking” — it was a scorched-earth rebuild starting from near zero.

Meanwhile:​

  • Montreal lucked into Cole Caufield and Slafkovsky, and made a fluke run to the Cup Final in a COVID-shortened season with Carey Price playing out of his mind.
  • Columbus? They’ve got talent, sure — but are they actually ahead of Detroit? They’ve been dead last in the East previous years and recently fired a coach mid '24. They also took big swings in free agency that haven’t fully panned out.
Neither team has done anything Detroit hasn't — and in fact, Detroit has more stability and structure moving forward.

On Yzerman: You want to fire the guy who built Tampa?​

Tampa’s Cups in 2020 and 2021 were built entirely off his drafting and development:
  • Kucherov
  • Point
  • Vasilevskiy
  • Cirelli
  • Sergachev (traded for Drouin)
  • Killorn, Palat, Hedman (held over)
He didn’t luck into a super team — he built it patiently. Detroit is just now starting to see those same results:
  • Seider, Raymond, Edvinsson, Kasper, Danielson, Cossa, Lombardi, Mazur — a pipeline with legitimate depth
  • They’re also near the playoff bubble in the hardest division in hockey and doing it with the youngest team in the league outside of rebuilding squads

And the “half of the East is garbage” line?​

That’s revisionist nonsense. The East is stacked with teams like:
  • Boston (historic pace last year)
  • Florida (Cup Finalist)
  • Toronto, Tampa, NYR, NJ, Buffalo (trending up), Ottawa (loaded with talent)
Detroit clawing their way into contention in that field is not insignificant.

Final thought:​

Rebuilds don’t always bear fruit by Year 6 — especially when you start from absolute zero like Detroit did. But right now:
  • They’re competitive
  • They’re deep in prospects
  • They have cap flexibility
  • And they’re being built by one of the most respected GMs in hockey
It’s fair to expect more by now — but saying they have “nothing to show for it” is just lazy. The foundation is there. The next step is coming.
Solid post!
 
Last edited:
You're not wrong to say that a rebuild can take a hell of a time to see the results pay off, but how often is it that the *next* GM is the one who gets to enjoy the glory of it? Of the examples you've given, only Dean Lombardi managed to both add critical pieces *and* keep his head above water long enough to reach that success.
That is true. We can also add to the fact that the salary cap was implemented in 2005-2006, so in some cases the rebuilding teams back then got a little bid of an advantage in that sense that many of the best teams had to shred salary to fit within the cap and took time to adjust as well with players under contracts and so on.

Those rebuild teams had flexibility and combined with high end picks talent/luck, think that is why teams like Pittsburgh and Chicago had such success shortly after drafting the higher end forwards.
 
I don’t think that’s correct. His UFA signings and some of his trades were premature but made the Wings “better” enough to ruin their chances for top 3-5 picks in the last few drafts, which they needed . . . and still need.
There's a select few picks that would have helped the team a considerable amount right now. Most would have required the team to be far, far worse than any additions via UFA stopped them from being.

Montreal& Columbus started their rebuild after Detroit, yet they are already at the same spot as Detroit and their future looks brighter
That's your opinion and you're entitled to it. The Athletic's recent prospect pool rankings had Montreal 3rd, Detroit 5th and Columbus 6th, so I'm not sure I buy an argument that any of these teams have a clearly brighter future than the other.

You have a horrible habit of using one timeframe for the redwings and a different one for everyone else. The post I quoted using drafting of a key player as “start date” and winning a cup as end date. This is faulty for multiple reasons and so I used an analogous important piece for red wings who will either need to be replaced or fingers crossed ages as well as one can hope given the ever shifting “timeline”. The main facts are the red wings have not made the playoffs since 2015-16 and have not won a playoff series since 2012-13. They’ve been about as slow a rebuild as one can imagine.
The problem is that Larkin's on an island in terms of relevant pieces acquired from the draft during the decade prior to 2019. It can't be compared to other rebuilds who landed multiple big pieces in a few consecutive drafts and built from there. That's the 2019-202X timeframe for Detroit.

Yeah, in some ways trading Larkin would have been the right choice. Gain some assets, go all-in on tanking a few more years, build from there. It's an EA Sports way of looking at it though. Most importantly; without Larkin there's almost no way the team would be competitive right now - so none of the "rebuild is slow" arguments would have changed. You'd likely just be harping on about how they should have kept Larkin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deca guard
By that post we should be seeing Detroit as a legit Stanley Cup champion

Chicago drafted Toews and Kane in 2006& 2007, won the Cup few years later

Tampa drafted Stamkos and Hedman in 2008& 2009 and went to the finals 2015


Montreal and Columbus are current rebuilds that have taken clearly less to get where Detroit has gotten

Maybe Detroit fans just do everything but accept reality, the rebuild so far has been an absolute failure
explain exactly what montreal n cbj have accomplished that detroit hasnt ?? 2019 yzerman was left with a worthless prospect pool , and meager tradable assets like mantha-bertuzzi-anthanasou . only good player was larkin . you mean while might notice that detroit didnt have the chance to draft hall of famers like kane / stamkos / hedman , think that might have something to do with it ?? you think that while even having the worst 50 man depth chart in nhl 2019 but never getting to draft earlier than 4th has something to do with it ?
 
I grew up loving the wings as my second team. The playoff streak stretched the prospect pool next to nothing and Uncle Gary not gifting you guys first overall picks to rebuild has hurt the wings. It was clear the nhl does some messing around gifting certain teams with lower chance to win the number one overall pick over the wings multiple times. You guys have some solid pieces to build around, just need to keep developing current talent, find a goalie that is ready to start, and keep building the prospect pool. I don't know if Yzerman will ever land a Kucherov, Point, Vasi, or Serhachev type but he has the wings being closer to back each year.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Nut Upstrom
It’s pretty easy. Their downfall was thinking that they were getting a brilliant GM and a stone cold negotiator.

When they just got a guy who exploited the no state tax advantage.

Take that away and he clearly isnt good at this.
Just not an accurate take. Clealry looking to gaslight. There's way more to it, just have to look at the drafting. It was way better in Tampa.
 
Just not an accurate take. Clealry looking to gaslight. There's way more to it, just have to look at the drafting. It was way better in Tampa.
Align the timelines and I'm not sure at all the drafting was "way better" in Tampa. A lot of benefit of the hindsight about what players ultimately developed into.
 
Align the timelines and I'm not sure at all the drafting was "way better" in Tampa. A lot of benefit of the hindsight about what players ultimately developed into.
Kucherov is a top 3/4 player from this generation. There isn't anything like that in Detroit.

You missed the point completely. The poster said it was all because of a no tax state.
 
Debrincat is a stud. One of my favorite DRWs players. Yzerman fleeced OTT on that trade
Dorion certainly was backed into a corner by his own incompetence and got fleeced.

Then Staios turned around and used the 1st round pick the Sens go from Detroit as the main piece to get Ullmark.

If the Wings had Ullmark instead of DeBrincat, they'd be likely on the verge of making the playoffs. They have a decent roster, but average to bad goaltenders the last few years have been their Waterloo.

There is no reason they couldn't have traded for Ullmark, but Staios is a better GM than Yzerman.

There is no guarantee their kids will become above-average goalies. Heck, the Sens' Merilainen is .925 and 1.99 in 12 NHL games this year and better AHL stats than Cossa, and I'm not guaranteening he'll be above-average.
 
Are you alluding to that's when DRWs rebuild "officially" started? Larkin was drafted 15th overall. Then drafts after him were 19th and 20th the following two years.

Weird rebuttal.




Let’s be real — rebuild timelines in the NHL aren’t linear, and comparing Detroit's path directly to Montreal or Columbus is overly simplistic and ignores key context.

First off —​

Unlike Montreal or Columbus, the Red Wings were coming off a 25-year playoff streak that left them with:
  • No high-end prospects
  • Aging contracts (Abdelkader, Nielsen, Ericsson, etc.)
  • A cupboard completely bare due to late draft picks and minimal prospect development under Ken Holland's final years
When Steve Yzerman came in, it wasn’t a matter of “tweaking” — it was a scorched-earth rebuild starting from near zero.

Meanwhile:​

  • Montreal lucked into Cole Caufield and Slafkovsky, and made a fluke run to the Cup Final in a COVID-shortened season with Carey Price playing out of his mind.
  • Columbus? They’ve got talent, sure — but are they actually ahead of Detroit? They’ve been dead last in the East previous years and recently fired a coach mid '24. They also took big swings in free agency that haven’t fully panned out.
Neither team has done anything Detroit hasn't — and in fact, Detroit has more stability and structure moving forward.

On Yzerman: You want to fire the guy who built Tampa?​

Tampa’s Cups in 2020 and 2021 were built entirely off his drafting and development:
  • Kucherov
  • Point
  • Vasilevskiy
  • Cirelli
  • Sergachev (traded for Drouin)
  • Killorn, Palat, Hedman (held over)
He didn’t luck into a super team — he built it patiently. Detroit is just now starting to see those same results:

Wrong.

The Lightning made the Conference Final in his first year. After missing for two straight years, they were right back in the playoffs in 2014. There was no 6 year drought under Yzerman (or 10 straight overall).,

Kucherov was drafted in 2011; he was in the NHL in 2013. Point was drafted in 2014 and was in the NHL in 2015. Vasilevskiy was drafted in 2012 and was in the NHL in 2014. They all stepped in and immediately began making meaningful contributions.

Furthermore, Kucherov, Vasilevskiy and Point are superstars. There is literally zero indication that Nate Danielson and his 9 goals in 61 AHL games will reach that level. How about Michael Brandsegg-Nygard and his 5 goals in 42 games this season?

We saw what Carter Mazur and his non-existent upper body look like at the NHL level - it lasted two shifts.

Going into year 7 on the job with no playoffs is unacceptable. There was no such drought with the Lightning. Spare me the "patient" nonsense. Jeff Vinnik, a real NHL owner, would never have allowed it.

The Red Wings must make the playoffs comfortably next season, or Yzerman needs to be fired. Period, end of story. No more coasting on his last name with terrible free agent signings and the excuse of "just wait for the kids" and demanding that the paying customers continue to shell out ridiculous money for a product that they openly admit isn't trying to win yet.

  • Seider, Raymond, Edvinsson, Kasper, Danielson, Cossa, Lombardi, Mazur — a pipeline with legitimate depth
  • They’re also near the playoff bubble in the hardest division in hockey and doing it with the youngest team in the league outside of rebuilding squads

Again, there's literally zero indication that any of these prospects aside from Sandin-Pellikka (which are nothing but job security for Yzerman to try and excuse his abysmal free-agent signings and the horrible decision to hire and keep Lalonde) will be elite NHL talents.

They're "near" the playoff bubble? That's the standard in Detroit? Let's see if a surgeon can get away with "Well, I almost saved my patients even if they all ended up dying on the operating table! Just give me 3-4 more years!"

Final thought:​

Rebuilds don’t always bear fruit by Year 6 — especially when you start from absolute zero like Detroit did. But right now:
  • They’re competitive
  • They’re deep in prospects
  • They have cap flexibility
  • And they’re being built by one of the most respected GMs in hockey
It’s fair to expect more by now — but saying they have “nothing to show for it” is just lazy. The foundation is there. The next step is coming.

A rebuild does not - I repeat - DOES NOT take 6 full years just to barely scrap into the playoffs if done correctly.

They're competitive? They're 2-10 in their last 12 games and just got blasted by a combined score of 10-4 in their last two games. They're melting down in the most crucial part of the schedule for the 3rd straight year.

Cap flexibility? They had $14 million to use at the Trade Deadline and acquired the corpse of Craig Smith and decided for some bizarre reason to bring back Mrazek and his 3.50 GAA (he and Talbot are under contract for another year, which means another year of no Cossa.)

How did they use their cap space in the summer (besides the Raymond and Seider contracts, which should not have taken until training camp had already started to work out)? How are those Tarasenko and Gustafsson deals looking? How about the Copp and Compher Ken Holland-esque deals?

Deep in prospects? Again, literally zero indication that any of these prospects (AKA job security) aside from ASP are going to be elite, game-changing talents. Detroit doesn't need more mid-level depth players - that's what they have now.

Fan patience is dwindling with Yzerman, as it should be. He's no longer able to coast on his last name and expect to be granted an endless runway just to make it back to the playoffs. Anyone else would have been fired by now.

Spare me the "but but he had to start with nothing" excuse. Irrelevant. He was the supposedly best GM in hockey, and he's going into year 7 with no playoff appearances (and yes, playoff experience is critical for players like Seider and Raymond, even if it means they get blasted in the first round).

"But Yzerman didn't win the Cup until he was 33! It takes time!" By the time 1997 rolled around, Yzerman had nearly 100 games of playoff experience.
 
Kucherov is a top 3/4 player from this generation. There isn't anything like that in Detroit.

You missed the point completely. The poster said it was all because of a no tax state.
If you align the timelines you wouldn't have known Kucherov was that guy yet. Just like you don't know the ultimate ceiling of Raymond, Buchelnikov, Cossa, Edvinsson etc.

I agree with you it's not all about the no tax, but it's not really the drafting either.

There is no reason they couldn't have traded for Ullmark, but Staios is a better GM than Yzerman.
If they didn't re-sign him it would have been a disaster like the Chychrun and Debrincat sagas. It's not a sound strategy overall to trade for guys with no guarantee of staying. Also as much as I like Ullmark he's now an 8 million dollar goaltender with zero track record of handling a starter's workload.

There is no guarantee their kids will become above-average goalies. Heck, the Sens' Merilainen is .925 and 1.99 in 12 NHL games this year and better AHL stats than Cossa, and I'm not guaranteening he'll be above-average.
You can say that about every prospect. So it's always the right move to trade futures for immediate help, right? Clearly there's more to it than that which I think you'd agree on.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Ad