I'd debate that.
New Jersey: essentially nothing outside the 1st round (and Holtz-Mercer-Mukhamadullin is a weeeeaaaaak result for 3 1st rounders in 2020)
Buffalo: JJ Peterka is a hit. But that's about it outside the 1st. Both Quinn & Cozens are also a bit underwhelming for top 10 picks so far imo.
LA: Really mixed bag. Faber is a great pick but does it count if they didn't even know what they had and traded him? 2019 I'd say their 1st round is a bit of a disaster (Turcotte+Björnfot). Does Kaliyev and Spence make up for that? Byfield still hasn't taken the next step.. but they have Laferriere I guess.
Ottawa: Lassi Thomson is a pretty decent d-man in the SHL these days. Pinto saves that draft for them. I don't think Järventie or Kleven are anything to write home about.
etc.
Personally the only pick I really wish Detroit would have made would be Peterka - that said I still think Wallinder has NHL potential.
NJ I'd probably agree; they didn't really draft better than Detroit in those two drafts (they also had a lot of picks). Though Mercer is a good player, and they used Holtz and Mukhamadullin to get Cotter and Meier as well, so they still wound up with a good amount of assets as a result (again, the benefit of being an active GM).
Buffalo got 3 solid forwards out of those drafts, including one outside the first round. And unlike Detroit, they didn't stockpile picks for those drafts either. I'm not a big Quinn fan, and the players they got aren't quite as big impact players as Raymond and Seider, but it's not like they could have picked those players either.
While I don't think Blake is a good GM, LA got a lot of good assets out of those 2 drafts. Even if they didn't recognize Faber's talent, they still flipped him for an excellent player in Fiala. Then Byfield, Laferriere and Spence. Their 2019 first round sucked, and I'm not convinced Kaliyev will ever be a contributor, but that's still a great haul overall.
Ottawa got Stutzle, Sanderson, Greig and Pinto from those two drafts (and Kastelic, but since he's basically a replacement-level player I won't count him). I would argue it's a better haul than what Detroit got.
NY also got a great haul in those two drafts, even if you ignore the lotto picks.
I give Yzerman full credits for two great picks in Raymond and Seider (particularly for Seider; Raymond was kind of an obvious pick). But my main point is that all these other teams (aside from NJ) got some value outside the first round, and Detroit didn't, despite specifically stockpiling a ton of picks for those two years. I just don't think you can ignore this if you're honestly evaluating Yzerman's drafting so far; getting something out of rounds 2-7 is a big part of being good at the draft.
Honestly It's not a big deal; plus, Detroit's later drafts look a bit better in that regard (though we won't truly know until they start making the NHL). I just don't understand why that other poster is so unshakably confident that Yzerman's scouting genius will single-handedly carry Detroit through a rebuild. I don't think the available data supports that conclusion.