Personally, I'd much rather send Phaneuf to Detriot instead of Franson.
Unfortunately, Detroit probably wouldn't be able to handle Phaneuf's over-blown salary/cap hit.
I think there will be a rush of teams that decide last minute they don't want to carry contracts for another 5-10 years of some players, but don't have the money to pony out am amnesty payout. It hasn't happened yet, but I fully expect it to.
In this situation we would benefit - the team would trade said player to us, along with compensation for the amnesty (ie, picks, prospects, or players) and we would subsequently buy the player out, should be chose to.
@ the suggestion that Franson is better than Phaneuf
yea let's trade him for a 3rd rounder, so we get a player that will have a 20% chance of becoming an NHLer (after 3,4 years as well) that franson already is
sounds like a good trade to me
Come on the Leafs can't draft a guy in the 2nd rd that can play. Franson has an upside and it's up the coaching staff to get it out of him.
Come on the Leafs can't draft a guy in the 2nd rd that can play. Franson has an upside and it's up the coaching staff to get it out of him.
Can't argue with that, if they asked we must have stumbled onto something. Then again Nashville did the drafting.My line of thought is if Detroit wants a player, don't trade him