Yzermans losing a blackberry for this oneWeird to see Detroit move him one year later
Yzermans losing a blackberry for this oneWeird to see Detroit move him one year later
What am I missing? Why is Nashville adding a 2024 2nd?
This is a prospect trade.
I am guessing Gibson has developed enough this past year that he almost doubled his value. This 2023 draft is chock full of defensive gems.What am I missing? Why is Nashville adding a 2024 2nd?
This is a prospect trade.
Detroit must know something about, and really like Kiiskinen, because they just rewarded Gibson with his ELC and I know they liked him..
Yzerman is on the record that if you hit the value on a player or prospect he will move them.Detroit must know something about, and really like Kiiskinen, because they just rewarded Gibson with his ELC and I know they liked him..
We’re gonna see some of these trades with how many D they have in their prospect pool.
This feels like Detroit and Nashville were working on a Saros trade but Detroit needed to dump cap first so Nashville did them a solid and gave them a second and a prospect for Gibson.Be interesting if this is just one of two trades made between the teams, and maybe we’re waiting on Saros agreeing to extend with Detroit, but they had to push this part of the trade, to close the Walman deal with the pick coming from Nashville. The only reason I say that is because I know Detroit really liked Gibson.
Nashville gets Husso @50%, Gibson, #15, and Berggren, and Detroit gets Kiiskinen, a third, and Saros.
let me dream
Detroit and Nashville.Who and who? Weird trades this morning.
I don’t think the Sharks have any retention slots leftThis feels like Detroit and Nashville were working on a Saros trade but Detroit needed to dump cap first so Nashville did them a solid and gave them a second and a prospect for Gibson.
I'm wondering if Detroit flips Husso to SJ so they can retain salary and move him to NSH, and that is the future consideration in the Walman deal. Walman and a second to SJ to retain on Husso, Nashville gets Husso @50%, Gibson, #15, and Berggren, and Detroit gets Kiiskinen, a third, and Saros.
The trade isn't finalized because it's pending a Saros extension.
let me dream
They could just outright take Husso then.I don’t think the Sharks have any retention slots left
They do need a goalie and some salary to get to the floorThey could just outright take Husso then.
It’s just a strange trade because not just 6 weeks ago they gave Gibson his ELC, and they’ve been really high on him.This feels like Detroit and Nashville were working on a Saros trade but Detroit needed to dump cap first so Nashville did them a solid and gave them a second and a prospect for Gibson.
I'm wondering if Detroit flips Husso to SJ so they can retain salary and move him to NSH, and that is the future consideration in the Walman deal. Walman and a second to SJ to retain on Husso, Nashville gets Husso @50%, Gibson, #15, and Berggren, and Detroit gets Kiiskinen, a third, and Saros.
The trade isn't finalized because it's pending a Saros extension.
let me dream
Especially in light of dumping Walman and a second for future considerations. Walman at 3.75 isn't bad enough of a player or contract to merit that trade.It’s just a strange trade because not just 6 weeks ago they gave Gibson his ELC, and they’ve been really high on him.
Interesting note on Kiiskinen, he does check all those boxes for an Yzerman forward. High paced, plays in traffic and creates space. It’ll be interesting to see where he’s at in Finland’s pecking order for the U20s, as he’s still only 18 years old. Was one of the youngest players in the draft last year, as an August birthday.
If he were a September birthday, he’d be in this year’s draft, as a higher pick than a 3rd, having a full Liiga season under his belt at 18, and U20 action already.
So he’s not chopped liver as a prospect. If there’s not more to this, it would be interesting to see how the deal went down. Maybe Detroit called on him and the Preds said sure, we’ll take Gibson, leading to the “give us a 2nd and since we have so many dmen, we’ll do it.”
Could be that simple. It’s not your normal deal though. That’s for sure..
Especially in light of dumping Walman and a second for future considerations. Walman at 3.75 isn't bad enough of a player or contract to merit that trade.
He was signed to an ELC. he wasn’t re entering any draftWeird. Assuming he’d renter the draft, couldn’t they just draft him with that 2nd and keep their prospect drafted last year? Maybe they figured he’d go earlier?