Confirmed Signing with Link: [DET] D Moritz Seider re-signs with the Red Wings (7 years, $8.55M AAV)

Henkka

Registered User
Jan 31, 2004
32,367
13,379
Tampere, Finland
I think that it's expected Seider will move to PP1 and Gus will run PP2 as he is not as dynamic offensively as Ghost was

I see it like this too. But quite sure they will experiment that DeBrincat-Gustafsson-Kane back-triangle, which was great at Chicago days. Maybe that's the 2nd unit.

1st unit
Compher-Larkin
Raymond-Seider-Tarasenko

2nd unit
Veleno-Berggren
DeBrincat-Gustafsson-Kane
 

Tatanka

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2016
4,723
3,212
Good deal for both parties. Congrats Wing fans, you have a solid base to build around with some nice assets in the pipeline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nut Upstrom

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
23,953
15,665
Seider at 8.5 or Dahlin at 11.5? (Two recent number one D signings.) Imo Seider is the kind of player a club wins with and Yzerman made a good decision.
 

Euro Twins

Healthy Scratch
Mar 19, 2016
902
786
Only an imbecile like Yzerman can make the Nurse contract seem reasonable

Lmfao. Seider has been better than nurse since his rookie season. He plays the hardest minutes in the league by far. That's not an opinion, it's a statistical fact. Holland gave nurse Makar money but that isn't Yzerman or seiders fault

Only 4 years next contract will be 16 Million a season :cool:.

4 years till what?
 

roman star

ready to march
Feb 17, 2019
412
237
becomes thee long term redwing core building block at a great cap hit . what an expert move by yzerman drafting him at 6
 
  • Like
Reactions: izlez

CanadienShark

Registered User
Dec 18, 2012
40,076
14,772
Pretty solid deal for the Wings I think. This is already fair and with the cap going up and him continuing to improve, it'll look even better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deca guard

tsujimoto74

Moderator
May 28, 2012
30,649
23,465
Seider at 8.5 or Dahlin at 11.5? (Two recent number one D signings.) Imo Seider is the kind of player a club wins with and Yzerman made a good decision.

Everyone but you knows this is Dahlin. One of those is a top 10 defenseman in the NHL. The other is maybe in your top 30 if you ignore all of his metrics and rank off vibes.
 
Last edited:

Tetsuo

Boss of a Pile of Rubble
Apr 11, 2018
1,524
1,381
Michigan
Everyone but you knows this is Dahlin. One of those is a top 10 defenseman in the NHL. The other is maybe in your top 30 if you ignore all of his metrics and rank off vibes.
I think it's fair to say Seider hasn't had a great season and a half...

But the metrics are only part of the story. The other part is historic defensive zone starts against opposing teams top players night in and night out paired with a run of bad to worse players across from him. People who stat watch are just as guilty of forming faulty opinions as those who rank based off "vibes".

Dahlin is better because he provides the more coveted skillset (offensive ability) but I'm sure he's very thankful he doesn't have to play Mo's minutes. Mo is so rarely started in the offensive zone compared to all the big stars, the points are hard to come by.
 

WhereAreTheCookies

Registered User
Feb 16, 2022
3,242
5,545
Top Shelf
I think it's fair to say Seider hasn't had a great season and a half...

But the metrics are only part of the story. The other part is historic defensive zone starts against opposing teams top players night in and night out paired with a run of bad to worse players across from him. People who stat watch are just as guilty of forming faulty opinions as those who rank based off "vibes".

Dahlin is better because he provides the more coveted skillset (offensive ability) but I'm sure he's very thankful he doesn't have to play Mo's minutes. Mo is so rarely started in the offensive zone compared to all the big stars, the points are hard to come by.
I get wanting to pump your guys tires, but there's nothing historic about his zone starts. Yes he had high defensive zone starts last season (about 20%) vs offensive zone starts (11%). Compare that to someone like Carlo on Boston who had 21% defensive zone starts vs 3% offensive zone and it doesn't look so skewed. Some of that can also be attributed to team play, as most of Detroits dmen had higher D-zone starts than O-zone last season if you compare those and remove neutral zone starts and on the fly changes.

All that said, this is a very nice contract and Mo should only get better as he hits his prime. I do think he's a great young player, so I'm not knocking him or trying to come off that way.
 

Tetsuo

Boss of a Pile of Rubble
Apr 11, 2018
1,524
1,381
Michigan
I get wanting to pump your guys tires, but there's nothing historic about his zone starts. Yes he had high defensive zone starts last season (about 20%) vs offensive zone starts (11%). Compare that to someone like Carlo on Boston who had 21% defensive zone starts vs 3% offensive zone and it doesn't look so skewed. Some of that can also be attributed to team play, as most of Detroits dmen had higher D-zone starts than O-zone last season if you compare those and remove neutral zone starts and on the fly changes.

All that said, this is a very nice contract and Mo should only get better as he hits his prime. I do think he's a great young player, so I'm not knocking him or trying to come off that way.
He's playing about 2.5 minutes more a night than Boston's (a deep playoff team) 3rd D, which is the key part I always forget about when rehashing this talking point. Their roles could not be more different so I'm not sure why you cherry picked this example.
 

WhereAreTheCookies

Registered User
Feb 16, 2022
3,242
5,545
Top Shelf
He's playing about 2.5 minutes more a night than Boston's (a deep playoff team) 3rd D, which is the key part I always forget about when rehashing this talking point. Their roles could not be more different so I'm not sure why you cherry picked this example.
Cherry picked? I looked up 1 team for an example. How about Esa Lindell? Chris Tanev? Mikey Anderson? Matt Roy? Lindgren? Oleksiak? how about 2 of Seiders teammates Walman and Chiarot? I can keep going.

Maybe don't toss around terms like historic for situations that are pretty common for many teams to utilize specific dmen for tougher assignments. 2nd pairing Dmen can still get the toughest assignments, especially when teams run their more offensive minded dmen on their top pairings. Carlo by the way, 2nd pairing not 3rd and averaged 16:46 at even strength last season to Seiders 17:32 .... that's not 2.5 minutes per game, that's more like 1 extra shift.

Playing a minute or 2 more per game doesn't take away from the fact that many players around the league are utilized in a similar manner, and with even more skewed zone starts. In fact many of those players probably had as many D-zone starts as Seider while playing slightly less due to the larger gap between the zone start percentages.
 
Last edited:

Tetsuo

Boss of a Pile of Rubble
Apr 11, 2018
1,524
1,381
Michigan
Cherry picked? I looked up 1 team for an example. How about Esa Lindell? Chris Tanev? Mikey Anderson? Matt Roy? Lindgren? Oleksiak? how about 2 of Seiders teammates Walman and Chiarot? I can keep going.

Maybe don't toss around terms like historic for situations that are pretty common for many teams to utilize specific dmen for tougher assignments. 2nd pairing Dmen can still get the toughest assignments, especially when teams run their more offensive minded dmen on their top pairings. Carlo by the way, 2nd pairing not 3rd and averaged 16:46 at even strength last season to Seiders 17:32 .... that's not 2.5 minutes per game, that's more like 1 extra shift.

Playing a minute or 2 more per game doesn't take away from the fact that many players around the league are utilized in a similar manner, and with even more skewed zone starts. In fact many of those players probably had as many D-zone starts as Seider while playing slightly less due to the larger gap between the zone start percentages. Math is hard though.
I'll leave you with two articles:

You'll notice that the only company he has in the usage charts here is Walman, his most frequent partner this past season.

As this article shows, you look at guys playing big roles on their team, very few players ever received this type of defensive workload.

It's pretty gruesome. His "one extra shift" is against the other teams best players, paired with a lot of bad to worse LDs. I'd still agree that Mo has to improve on his game, he's still making more unforced errors than I like, but he's actually held up quite well and is going to be more than worth his deal by the end of it.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad