WhatTheDuck
9 - 20 - 8
Despres to Toronto sounds interesting. If I were the Ducks, I'd ask for young players who can fill their NHL forward depth.
Leivo + Lindberg?
This Ducks fan would say yes to that, happen to be a big fan of Lindberg.
Despres to Toronto sounds interesting. If I were the Ducks, I'd ask for young players who can fill their NHL forward depth.
Leivo + Lindberg?
I'd really love the Ducks to get Komarov. I don't expect Leafs trade him, but what medium add could Ducks include with Despres?
I imagine Leo can play LW since he shoots left - NHL lists him as a C. RC would prob love this guy also.
This Ducks fan would say yes to that, happen to be a big fan of Lindberg.
Despres to Toronto sounds interesting. If I were the Ducks, I'd ask for young players who can fill their NHL forward depth.
Leivo + Lindberg?
Leivo is 23 and he's failed to crack the Leafs roster when they are the worst team in the NHL.
Seems odd to then dangle him as the centre piece of a trade for an NHL talent and characterize him as a "prize."
How would he crack the Ducks when he couldn't even crack the Leafs?
Despres is coming off a season of injuries and poor play. If that continues into next season he quickly becomes a negative value contract and he's signed for 5 seasons.
The pieces in the OP aren't very valuable. That's kind of the point, neither is Despres.
For the Ducks the goal of this move would be to ship him out for as much as they can squeeze before his value turns anymore to the south and they can't move him. They have lots of young defenders and a few proven defenders better then Despres already.
All the players in the OP still have NHL upside. But, are of the bubble player variety currently.
All of these competent, valuable, yummy players that keep showing up in proposal after proposal. It's almost like Toronto fans are trying to do us a favor, how nice.
Hah this is the typical hfboards trade offer. "id like to trade for this player on his team. He's horrible and will probably soon have negative value. Not sure why you'd want to hold on to him really. Might as well get something for him. Here! Take this player. He's on the cusp of greatness. I mean we would love to keep him but we have too many great players."
Here's a bunch of stuff we don't want. Please?
These responses keep getting sadder and tiresome. Could you at least act like you know what you're talking about instead of making sweeping generalizations about prospects you know nothing about?
All of these competent, valuable, yummy players that keep showing up in proposal after proposal. It's almost like Toronto fans are trying to do us a favor, how nice.
Lindberg+picks. Leivo is not needed.Looks like someone didn't get the memo. Although Leivo is probably not enough on his own to land Despres, he most certainly is not some bottom feeding prospect either. The op wants a conversation and garbage like this isn't conducive to that. Anyways, Despres makes sense for the Leafs in that he fills a need. What do the Ducks realistically want?
That's not a good argument. See Schultz, Justin.
Despres is coming off a season of injuries and poor play. If that continues into next season he quickly becomes a negative value contract and he's signed for 5 seasons.
For the Ducks the goal of this move would be to ship him out for as much as they can squeeze before his value turns anymore to the south and they can't move him.
it's bothSo now Despres is on the verge of having "negative value" and if he's not traded soon the Ducks will be unable to move him at all.
I can't decide if this post is funny or sad.
So now Despres is on the verge of having "negative value" and if he's not traded soon the Ducks will be unable to move him at all.
I can't decide if this post is funny or sad.
Maybe, value fluctuates.
What's a player under contract for another 4 years at big money after 2 years of injury troubles and poor on ice play worth? Obviously, if he continues to fail to live up to his contract he becomes harder and harder to move. He could come into next season and be great and that's a very real possibility. Which is why I would take his contract on in the first place and trade positive value for it. But, if you can't see the risk here, I don't know what to tell you.
Despres + 4th for A johnson + Dzierkals
Wha?? Yes he was iffy after the concussion, but prior to that? He looked fantastic with the Ducks. Even with the Pens he managed to look decent while babysitting that boat anchor Scuderi. There is literally zero reason to believe that he won't be able to return to pre-concussion form after the offseason rest. He's hardly the first player whose play has looked a bit shaky for a few months after a serious concussion.
Despres to Toronto sounds interesting. If I were the Ducks, I'd ask for young players who can fill their NHL forward depth.
Leivo + Lindberg?
What's a player under contract for another 4 years at big money after 2 years of injury troubles and poor on ice play worth?
I know Anaheim is up tight against the cap and there were concerns about Despres recovering from his concussion.
The Leafs could provide some bodies up front to help fill out the roster IF that was something the Ducks have a desire to do.
The Leafs could offer
Leivo (I know most fan bases aren't aware of him but think he can do well for you guys)
Holland (help the centre situation with Thompson out)
Corrado (if you need a 6-7 with Despres leaving)
Leipsic (can likely be a cheap young depth option for Anaheim for the future, has had success in the AHL a few years now)
Are these pieces or any other pieces in our system something that could appeal to Anaheim? Just thought of this as I know you're tight on the cap with some forwards to add, Rackell and Lindholm to re-sign etc.
IF not, then that is cool. Just thought this could be a classic buy-low scenario due to cap situation and Despres's concussion.
My personal 2 cents is that Leivo is the prize here, I think he'd fit in really well with Anaheim. He is great along the boards, has a good stick, doesn't lose board battles that often and has a great shot.
He was one of our top forwards in the AHL playoffs. Babcock had wanted him to work hard this summer on his fitness and the team ultimately signed him to a 1-way contract which was 2 years in length, I think it's a sign he's doing some great work.
Obviously you'd require 2-3 pieces or maybe a pick coming back the other way.
Thanks