Forbort's metrics at 5-on-5 grade similar to that of Brandon Carlo. He also has the lowest offensive zone starts and second-highest defensive zone starts on the roster behind Carlo. Yeah, he's had some soft plays that have led to a -1 on the ice, but personally I don't care because we're not even at American Thanksgiving yet.
This team is clearly not gelling, is not in a rhythm and hasn't had much of an opportunity to string consecutive efforts together due to the scheduling.
What's more likely, you think? That Derek Forbort suddenly forgot how to play hockey or that a nine-game sample on a new team with a bootleg schedule is affecting him? I'm inclined to believe the latter, but hey, that's just me.
Forbort shouldn't be playing top-pair minutes or receiving top-pair assignments, but tell me, how's that his problem? Cassidy is the one setting the lineup and choosing where and when to use Forbort. Is that because he sees something we all don't? That's possible. Is it because he wants to see what he has in his new addition to the team? Maybe he likes what he sees from Forbort as opposed to other options right now, I just don't know.
I do know that I'm not going to lose my mind over a bottom-pair defenseman who was signed to add some depth to the lineup. Evan Gold and Sweeney have been good at managing the cap in recent years and I don't see how the former would have advised the latter to sign someone to a short-term $3m AAV contract if the risk couldn't be managed.
But at the end of the day, it's always easier to dump on the low-hanging fruit when you're a frustrated fan behind the keyboard on an online message board.
It's not his fault.
I just don't agree with our current construction of D and cap allotment to the left side.
Reilly (3M), Grzelyk (3.65M), Forbot (3M), Moore (2.75) = 12.4M for the left side when healthy. Yes, one can slot to the third pair R side, but point remains the same. That's a lot of quantity vs quality. While I fully understand what they are trying to do with that configuration, it might not be the answer.
Is it all doom and gloom? No. Am I rooting for Forbot to fail? No. Do I want him the team to win? Yes. Do I want Forbot to do well? Yes. Will I be surprised if this plan doesn't work? No.
It's not the worst out there, but it's clearly got a lot of room for improvement. And quite honestly, with the way the cap is structured, 3rd pair/7th D making 3M isn't exactly easy to move. It's not Belesky or Backes bad, but it's also an anchor. If Forbot doesn't eventually click here... that's what we are looking at.
Anyways, Forbot has time. Maybe he'll get better with the system. Hope he does. But if he doesn't, well, we can just chalk that up to another list of bad cap/pro scouting acquisitions.