Davidson's Performance Evaluation Thread (read OP) | Page 43 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Davidson's Performance Evaluation Thread (read OP)

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
Forget the whole trade for a second. And forget contracts too. I'm just curious from a hockey standpoint what you guys think. If we assume McKenna, Stenberg, and Reid go 1,2,3, would you guys rather have Carels or Malhotra than Byram?
 
Forget the whole trade for a second. And forget contracts too. I'm just curious from a hockey standpoint what you guys think. If we assume McKenna, Stenberg, and Reid go 1,2,3, would you guys rather have Carels or Malhotra than Byram?
Pure hockey standpoint he's obviously an immediate upgrade but you can't assess this kind of trade that way. It really depends what the extension comes in at. If it's reasonable then I'd take Byram but still not love adding on to get him. If it's a bad contract that threatens the future health of the cap sheet I'd probably rather have the younger guy with more team control.
 
Yeah, I'm out.

The Byram trade is the kind of perfect storm of overpayment, poor talent evaluation, and complete lack of understanding of where your team stands that it completely undermines any faith in the rebuild going forward.

I was behind KD because he was showing patience and commitment to a plan. Even if I didn't agree with particular choices like Lev over Demidov, they still fell within the bounds of the long-term vision for this build.
tenor.gif
 
Yeah, I'm out.
You were a canes fan even before this trade.
The Byram trade is the kind of perfect storm of overpayment, poor talent evaluation, and complete lack of understanding of where your team stands that it completely undermines any faith in the rebuild going forward.
By adding a 25 year old?
I was behind KD because he was showing patience and commitment to a plan.
No you weren’t lmfao you were marking out for every other team but this one.
Even if I didn't agree with particular choices like Lev over Demidov, they still fell within the bounds of the long-term vision for this build.
You were glazing teams that only drafted forwards LeMao
 
Forget the whole trade for a second. And forget contracts too. I'm just curious from a hockey standpoint what you guys think. If we assume McKenna, Stenberg, and Reid go 1,2,3, would you guys rather have Carels or Malhotra than Byram?
I would've gone Malhotra. Love me a potential 2-way power forward pivot and I feel we need more forward help rather than help on defense.

Carels I could see becoming something similar to Byram, more D, less O, but similar caliber of player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mrfenn92
Forget the whole trade for a second. And forget contracts too. I'm just curious from a hockey standpoint what you guys think. If we assume McKenna, Stenberg, and Reid go 1,2,3, would you guys rather have Carels or Malhotra than Byram?

Carels then Malhotra, both over Byram
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Toews2Bickell
mainboard thread about KD gotta be some of the dumbest shit posted about Hawks in a bit...you'd think he sold everything for Byram...the #1 pipeline, the 3 1sts in 27....Frondell...etc etc...just a brutal thread
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beukeboom Fan
People do realize GMs will not be announcing what moves they’re working on or looking into right? Davidson could do something massive tomorrow and he won’t be saying shit.

They just love Kantserov a lot and want him to know it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad