Archijerej
Registered User
Let's hope so.Slafkovsky easily! I think when this kid will realize how big and strong he is he will be a danger out there.
Let's hope so.Slafkovsky easily! I think when this kid will realize how big and strong he is he will be a danger out there.
We will hope for sure but that's the management logic IMO.Let's hope so.
I also don't think they went for safe picks. This is certainly not an angle they should be criticized from.We will hope for sure but that's the management logic IMO.
Same for Reinbacher, he might not be the best player in the first couple of years but the ceiling they see in him will make him the best pick eventually.
So when people say they went with safe picks, I think it's the complete opposite!
They gambled on those two picks reaching their highest potential possible.
That's all you hear though... They didn't have the balls to risk the small Russian RW and went for the safe D instead.I also don't think they went for safe picks. This is certainly not an angle they should be criticized from.
It looks deep enough to the point we will have kids playing in Laval who should probably be in the NHL. That is a good problem to have.Hugo seems to be building similarly to the way Carolina is currently and how Nashville was previously. A deep talented blueline as the foundation looks to be the key.
We'll be the next golden generation of Red Wings!It looks deep enough to the point we will have kids playing in Laval who should probably be in the NHL. That is a good problem to have.
People who are onboard and understand the type of team they are trying to build, (even a number of smart Michkovites) see the logic in what they have done so far. I'm just happy we were able to potentially fill two gaping holes this draft. First Newhook who has enough skill/tools to vault over the majority of our forwards will be appreciated from day one as a sorely needed injection of talent into our top six. Both Suzuki and Dach had at least one questionable winger on their flanks most nights. The only time they didn't was when they played together and the results then were eye opening. Even if Newhook is not the answer in two or three years he can help with the progression now when it is most critical. We've already touched on Reinbacher and where he projects to fit in three years. Going into the draft what I hoped to get with the fifth pick was a guy who would be roster ready next season. Having selected the Dman that probably won't/shouldn't happen and a Seider type of graduation is fine. This is where grabbing Newhook becomes a bonus for me. I laugh at a lot of people who were whining when the Fla. pick kept dropping and then started whining when we traded it. Teams trade second round picks all the time and can often not even have one come draft day. They way I look at it we picked fifth and ended up with Newhook and Reinbacher. Not a bad haul considering.I also don't think they went for safe picks. This is certainly not an angle they should be criticized from.
I agree. Reinbacher was a complete unknown at this time last year. Michkov has been a big name for almost three years and would have been the "safer" pick. HuGo wants to build the team from back-end and I assume/hope they're done there. Time to move on to the forwards. The problem with not drafting Michkov is that the opportunity to draft that type of talent almost never happens but we had a chance last week and passed. That's why I don't like the pick, nothing against the Austrian.We will hope for sure but that's the management logic IMO.
Same for Reinbacher, he might not be the best player in the first couple of years but the ceiling they see in him will make him the best pick eventually.
So when people say they went with safe picks, I think it's the complete opposite!
They gambled on those two picks reaching their highest potential possible.
I am not sure at all about that. Michkov was not the safest pick and 5 teams saw that.I agree. Reinbacher was a complete unknown at this time last year. Michkov has been a big name for almost three years and would have been the "safer" pick. HuGo wants to build the team from back-end and I assume/hope they're done there. Time to move on to the forwards. The problem with not drafting Michkov is that the opportunity to draft that type of talent almost never happens but we had a chance last week and passed. That's why I don't like the pick, nothing against the Austrian.
In terms of avoiding blowback and misplaced criticism he was definitely the safe pick.I am not sure at all about that. Michkov was not the safest pick and 5 teams saw that.
To be clear, he was one of the safe picks, not the only one. But now that we have him, hoping for the best.In terms of avoiding blowback and misplaced criticism he was definitely the safe pick.
I have no problem with my management not picking a guy they don't really like I'd be far more pissed if they did.
Yes safe to be sure for entirely diffferent reasons.To be clear, he was one of the safe picks, not the only one. But now that we have him, hoping for the best.
And you would know those reasons because you get privileged info from management?Yes safe to be sure for entirely diffferent reasons.
I know as much as you NOTHING.And you would know those reasons because you get privileged info from management?
Nobody knows anything other than an early pick looking like a combo of safety and needs.
So fulfilling to be posting among equals.I know as much as you NOTHING.
Ain't that the truth. I don't know about you but I sleep better for it and I'm guessing our buddy @OldCraig71 does as well.So fulfilling to be posting among equals.
Our good buddy @OldCraig71 really doesn’t give two craps about any of this. That’s his secret weapon. His happiness depends on none of this.Ain't that the truth. I don't know about you but I sleep better for it and I'm guessing our buddy @OldCraig71 does as well.
I like his poise, there's no panic in his game. Shows very good understanding of the game surrounding him. Just seems to make the right decisions. Good stick, good size, good speed. Solid.
Speak for yourselves.