Right, and I think hes using them as leverage to get his staff taken care of, not a bigger number for himself.
He should just come here and get a bigger number for everyone, including himself.
Right, and I think hes using them as leverage to get his staff taken care of, not a bigger number for himself.
He should just come here and get a bigger number for everyone, including himself.
What were the Edmonton discussions? Pulju/Lias? Nuge? Someone 'heavy' for Buch?Unfortunately, those types of deals usually don't happen anyway. Even now I wouldn't trade Kakko for Zegras --- and I love Zegras. Kakko looks like he's ready to become a beast out there.
If there is a silver lining to someone like Gallant, it's that in theory two kids like Lafreniere and Kakko should be right in his wheel house.
I think the real shame is that we couldn't get the Edmonton discussions across the finish line in our discussions heading into and during the 2019 draft.
What were the Edmonton discussions? Pulju/Lias? Nuge? Someone 'heavy' for Buch?
Buch for the 9th pick.
Any Andersson/Poolparty talks seemed to exist a bit outside of that discussion.
Because of Gallant himself or because they aren't done constructing the team?I think he will help them take the next steps, though I am not sure he's the guy who gets them to the promised land. There's a lingering doubt for me that it is probably the guy after him.
Bigger gym too.He should just come here and get a bigger number for everyone, including himself.
The tweet was that he has been a HC in Carolina for 3 years now.I could've sworn Rod just signed a 3 year extension? Maybe I was seeing things
They have a three-year on the table for less than what he made this year.I could've sworn Rod just signed a 3-year extension? Maybe I was seeing things
Ahhh thats what it was, I gotta pay more attention sometimes lol, thanks.The tweet was that he has been a HC in Carolina for 3 years now.
Just for reference, Rod was in the bottom half of the large for salary a 2 mil.They have a three-year on the table for less than what he made this year.
And they are not willing to give his assistants raises.
Because of Gallant himself or because they aren't done constructing the team?
To be fair, I think it was intentionally ambivalent as a sort of a teaser.Ahhh thats what it was, I gotta pay more attention sometimes lol, thanks.
who turned down the offer?
He hasn’t signed it yet. Read 31 Thoughts.I could've sworn Rod just signed a 3 year extension? Maybe I was seeing things
Yeah, they do. But, as long as they play the players WE AT HFBOARDS/RANGERS think they should play, then we will like him, right?I already do not like the next coach
Sort of being sarcastic, yet all the coaches for the most part do the same things. They all make weird lines, and they all switch them up. All of them pick favorites and play them more than they should. They are all stubborn in the face of reality.
Ultimately Edmonton elected to keep the pick.
The Rangers definitely like Sullivan (as do I), but there's no guarantee anymore that him and Pittsburgh part ways and the Rangers need to make a hire sooner than later.
Hiring Torts would signify that Dolan--not Drury--is in charge, and that's a scary thing.
I'm confident that Gallant is out. He would have been here already if there was mutual interest. But maybe Drury now being in the picture changes things.
That's probably a year past when posters here want a new coach fired anyway.Gallant is a guy, for whatever reason, who can't seem to make it out of his third season as a head coach.