Player Discussion David Pastrnak IV

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jorah Marshmont

Long may he reign
May 10, 2012
4,699
3,127
Is there anyone in the top ten in that draft who is now better than Pasta ? Who were the top ten that year ?

Well he's leading the draft class in goals. Third in points. Fourth in assists. Looks like he wouldn't have been out of place as a top 5 pick, going off this point in time. But who knows how it will look in 3 or 4 years
 

Alberta_OReilly_Fan

Bruin fan since 1975
Nov 26, 2006
14,331
3,941
Edmonton Canada
Looking like a 6x6 type of deal upcoming for pastrnak. Certainly doable with about 5 coming off the books with liles and chara

Cap math is a bit more complicated than that... when chara and likes come off, their replacement gets added

Then we need to cover marchands raise

Spooned will be arbitration eligible

We might be scrambling to afford a 5th forward in that 6 mill territory.

If he ends up with 40+ goals we will need to payup... but if he doesn't hit that type of number I think we need to bridge him. This is just 1 great season after all.
 

BsEuphoria

The Future
Sep 21, 2013
2,125
2
It's always a tough decision to make to try to sign before the big year or hopefully you see it coming and get a slightly reduced rate for it. Either way, It's been a long time since I've watched the B's and felt like something like that OT goal could happen at any moment he gets the puck. I freakin love it.
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,319
24,234
Ekblad went #1 he would be the only one possibly someone woumd take over Pasta.

Reinhart and Draisaitl went 2 and 3.

Draisaitl is looking pretty good. He's over a PPG the last 15 games or so. Can play wing or center.

Redo that draft to me there is a clear 1-2-3 at the top (Ekblad, Pasta, Draisitl), then there is a drop off after that to the next tier with Larkin, Ehlers, Reinhart, etc.
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,319
24,234
Cap math is a bit more complicated than that... when chara and likes come off, their replacement gets added

Then we need to cover marchands raise

Spooned will be arbitration eligible

We might be scrambling to afford a 5th forward in that 6 mill territory.

If he ends up with 40+ goals we will need to payup... but if he doesn't hit that type of number I think we need to bridge him. This is just 1 great season after all.

Without looking it up, there is some small loophole that was mentioned on here this summer by a more CBA-versed poster than myself, and I don't think Spooner has arbitration rights, and thus reduced negotiating power.
 

pierre gagnon*

Registered User
Mar 15, 2013
2,191
2
St. Catharines
David Pastrnak is making $832,500 and has 15 goals in 21 games = 55,500 per goal.
I just divided the goals into the salary. Then Pastrnak is one of the best bargains this year, if not the best.

It is looking like some GMs should be upset with their scouts and time to pump the kids tires as well as management for taking him at 25th overall. The bashing they took for the other draft should go the same way in reverse for those that passed on Pasta and Carlo
 

Alan Ryan

Registered User
Jun 1, 2006
9,145
1,799
David Pastrnak is making $832,500 and has 15 goals in 21 games = 55,500 per goal.
I just divided the goals into the salary. Then Pastrnak is one of the best bargains this year, if not the best.

It is looking like some GMs should be upset with their scouts and time to pump the kids tires as well as management for taking him at 25th overall. The bashing they took for the other draft should go the same way in reverse for those that passed on Pasta and Carlo


Kirk has the best information on Pastrnak and the draft. Great story: https://scoutingpost.com/2016/12/06/becoming-pastrnak/
 

wintersej

Registered User
Nov 26, 2011
23,180
18,957
North Andover, MA
I remember the Behind the B's draft episode where they were pumping the crap out of Pastrnak's tires before he even played a game. Amazing they were so right about the kid (and confident enough about it to make their little PR show talk him up so much) and he fell all the way to them.
 

Nose Face Killah

Dracarys
Dec 2, 2012
9,481
1,001
MA
this kid needs to get signed already. i just need to know he'll be here for the forseeable and won't be traded on some ********
 
Mar 11, 2013
2,051
995
QC
Update from Habs board. They are drooling over Pasta.
I'm a Habs fan, can confirm. I was so high on Pastrnak in his draft year, watching him play with Nylander was really something, so many beautiful plays. I obviously didn't expect him to be this good this early but the fact he went 25th is outrageous, injury or not.
 

ashnathan

Registered User
Apr 22, 2014
13,557
253
Australia
So how did Larkin make it to the All Star Game yet Pastrnak doesnt get a look in??? Makes 0 sense for a guy that is what...3rd in goals in the league in less games than the 2nd place getter? Seems odd.

Id rather they lock him up than bridge him, if they bridge him, and he pots 35/40 this year, then backs it up next year, he will be getting MEGA bucks.
 

VictorLustig

Registered User
Feb 8, 2012
8,872
2,927
I'm a Habs fan, can confirm. I was so high on Pastrnak in his draft year, watching him play with Nylander was really something, so many beautiful plays. I obviously didn't expect him to be this good this early but the fact he went 25th is outrageous, injury or not.

I think he hurt is draft stock by playing at the U18 WC after being out for a long time. He was nowhere near the same player there as he was pre-injury and that must have scared off a lot of teams.
 

Alberta_OReilly_Fan

Bruin fan since 1975
Nov 26, 2006
14,331
3,941
Edmonton Canada
Without looking it up, there is some small loophole that was mentioned on here this summer by a more CBA-versed poster than myself, and I don't think Spooner has arbitration rights, and thus reduced negotiating power.

cap friendly has him eligible for arbitration... from what ive read of the rules I see no reason he wouldn't be

on the other hand david pastrnak isn't eligible... and despite all the talk of giving him a 7-8 year deal, I think that is the wrong choice to make. when a guy isn't eligible for arbitration its stupid not to bridge the kid.

theres been a lot of very talented players who get a huge contract and never again live up to their potential. playing hockey requires you to work through the pain. it requires you to live a Spartan lifestyle off the ice to keep in shape. it requires you to leave your crap at the door when game starts and focus.

talent alone... doesn't let you be elite. its a full 24/7 lifestyle and a lot of hard work to be Crosby or gretzky or orr

pastrnak is looking to be our best pure goal scorer since neely... its a great great thing... but id like to see him have 3 above average seasons before we open up the vault for him.

bridge him now... then give him the moon on his next deal... we get 10 years locked up instead of 8 and that might be a huge thing once ufa rolls around. losing him at 28 would really suck
 

Pia8988

Registered User
May 26, 2014
14,659
9,232
cap friendly has him eligible for arbitration... from what ive read of the rules I see no reason he wouldn't be

on the other hand david pastrnak isn't eligible... and despite all the talk of giving him a 7-8 year deal, I think that is the wrong choice to make. when a guy isn't eligible for arbitration its stupid not to bridge the kid.

theres been a lot of very talented players who get a huge contract and never again live up to their potential. playing hockey requires you to work through the pain. it requires you to live a Spartan lifestyle off the ice to keep in shape. it requires you to leave your crap at the door when game starts and focus.

talent alone... doesn't let you be elite. its a full 24/7 lifestyle and a lot of hard work to be Crosby or gretzky or orr

pastrnak is looking to be our best pure goal scorer since neely... its a great great thing... but id like to see him have 3 above average seasons before we open up the vault for him.

bridge him now... then give him the moon on his next deal... we get 10 years locked up instead of 8 and that might be a huge thing once ufa rolls around. losing him at 28 would really suck

And if he succeeds you get a PK Subban situation. I would much rather get the cap savings during what will most likely be his best statistical years. Nothing says he's only going to get one big contract from the Bruins or that he ends up with two. In a cap world especially trying to save money will help out with getting more quality depth.
 

JRull86

Registered User
Jan 28, 2009
27,764
15,803
South Shore
Nothing but impressed with his play this year.

Obviously the goals are great, but it's the other stuff in his game this season that's impressed me. Taking the body, throwing hits, getting back defensively, etc. He's bought in completely, and his overall game has benefitted because of it.

Bruins would be crazy not to get this guy locked up long term.
 

JRull86

Registered User
Jan 28, 2009
27,764
15,803
South Shore
Give him Sheifele money (49M/8y) and enjoy the next decade.

That's exactly where they should be on his next contract. Gives the team term at a good value AAV wise. Gives the player financial security and still allows for him to cash in on another long-term deal at 28 or 29 years old.
 

b in vancouver

Registered User
Jul 28, 2005
7,863
5,720
I was saying this summer that it'd be interesting to see what would happen with pasta and draisatl, as both didn't play full seasons at 18. You might've burnt an elc year, but could get them to sign that 2nd contract at 20, before they broke out and hopefully save yourself a lot of money moving forward.
Thought of it as a case study for teams keeping junior players up for 10 games even if they weren't quite ready... As there's a big difference getting players of their skill and potential signed at 20-21 than 21-23.

It'd be amazing if he keeps it up and challenges for the rocket this year.
 

JCRO

At least I'm safe inside my mind
Sponsor
Mar 8, 2011
9,185
10,729
We gotta vote this kid onto the all star team.

https://www.nhl.com/all-star-ballot

Yeahhh..

Ill refrain from voting for Jimmy and start tossing some votes Pastas way. I want him there more than putting Jimmy there as a joke. :laugh:

Edit: Wally, any chance we could get a thread going for voting him in or is that not appropriate? Last I saw, Bergeron was actually one of the leaders in the polls... Not trying to create conflict or anything of that measure.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad