Prospect Info: David Jiříček, RHD (via CBJ - 6thOA, 2020)

[DANOZ28]

no one here is answering the ? , why would cbj give up on him / trade him if he had this guaranteed bright future? to call this a low risk or med risk for all the draft capital we gave up is a joke. its a message board and im entitled to my opinion. several times i've been right and when i mention it say 2 years down the road every poster says "i never said that" posters will never change.

 

[MuckOG]

no one here is answering the ? , why would cbj give up on him / trade him if he had this guaranteed bright future? to call this a low risk or med risk for all the draft capital we gave up is a joke. its a message board and im entitled to my opinion. several times i've been right and when i mention it say 2 years down the road every poster says "i never said that" posters will never change.

A couple of points. First, I haven't seen anyone say that this kid has a "guaranteed bright future". Many are saying that it's a gamble and there is some risk involved.

Secondly, teams "give up" on players and trade them all the time. There are numerous examples of teams moving young players before they hit their prime. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. Do the LA Kings regret trading Brock Faber in a package for Kevin Fiala? Possibly.

There's no guarantee that Jiricek turns into a solid top 4 player. But evidently, the Wild think that the tools are there, but he just needs some more time to develop into the player they think he can turn into./

 

[BagHead]

no one here is answering the ? , why would cbj give up on him / trade him if he had this guaranteed bright future? to call this a low risk or med risk for all the draft capital we gave up is a joke. its a message board and im entitled to my opinion. several times i've been right and when i mention it say 2 years down the road every poster says "i never said that" posters will never change.

We're saying that because the best piece the Wild gave up has a fairly certain future as a #5-6 LD (Hunt) barring major developmental setbacks or leaps, while what the Wild got back has a still has a potential future as a #2-3 RD, and it's not a far-flung possibility as long as he can improve his skating.

The 1st is a late pick, and those pan out pretty infrequently, and when they do they tend to be bottom-6 forwards or bottom pairing defensemen, and the other picks are even later with even less of a chance of turning into a player.

No one is saying you don't need any picks, but the Wild have a very full prospect system right now, and they won't be able to develop all of the guys they pick if they keep picking as many players as possible in the draft. They only have one AHL top line to plug prospects into, they only have 50 contract spots available. There are constraints on quantity, so when you run up against them as the Wild have, it's better to use some future picks or current prospects as currency in order to "move up" in terms of quality when you have the rare chance to.

tl;dr They swapped a fairly easy to replace defenseman out by giving up fairly low-end lottery tickets with a potential, much harder to replace, top-4 defenseman.

 

[Digitalbooya]

no one here is answering the ? , why would cbj give up on him / trade him if he had this guaranteed bright future? to call this a low risk or med risk for all the draft capital we gave up is a joke. its a message board and im entitled to my opinion. several times i've been right and when i mention it say 2 years down the road every poster says "i never said that" posters will never change.

It’s low risk in that our prospect pool is stacked with guys and the one position we didn’t feel great about is the one we just added a former top 10 draft pick to.

I believe the 3rd/4th round picks were the picks acquired from the Dewar/Duhaime trades. So we traded Hunt+1st+2nd+Dewar+Duhaime for a high upside prospect, who’s one “flaw” (skating) now has access to a couple of the best coaches for that in the world (Ness’).

-late 1st
-late 2nd
-LD prospect that was never going to play here
-4th line fringe player
-4th line fringe player

That’s the way the package should be viewed by Wild fans. That’s a steal IF Jiricek is a 2nd pairing dman. That doesn’t take into account if Jiricek gets the training and progress needed to be a top pairing guy. We massively win the trade in that case.

You’re entitled to your opinion. People are also entitled to stating their disagreement with your opinion. That’s how freedom of speech works.

 

[north21]

I think a huge benefit is having both faber and buium being the likely guys who do a lot of the heavy lifting down the road so jiricek doesn't have to be THE guy. We just need him to contribute and if he booms great.