I dont get why a lot of posters in this thread feel like they have any right what so ever to tell anyone what they should value the most. A lot of europeans and russians value international medals over the cup, period.
As a North American, it's always been engrained that the Cup is the epitome of hockey glory.
Then I see the Finns, Swedes, Czechs and Russians. And over time, I have gotten it. Why wouldn't an Olympic Gold mean more to them? It's their country. They've all played for their national team. Why in the world would a championship for a North American city mean more to them than national glory? Would they rather celebrate in a U.S. city, or in front of the people of their home country?
I think of someone like Draisaitl. The amount of pride he'd feel for his countrymen if they pulled off the most impossible feat. But also likely disappointment not being in that position to enjoy such a moment. If he was there, that may have been his "Stanley Cup" moment.
When I say I'd rather choose the Stanley Cup than an Olympic Gold, it's because the Stanley Cup is so much harder to win. A number of years in which you play 82 games a season plus 16 to 28 playoff games, versus a two-week tournament every four years. One to me sees much more harder to accomplish. But I'll never fault a player to suggest playing for their country with the hopes of hearing/singing their national anthem at the end of it all is more important.