the difference is Tom is a good player.Looked fantastic over the weekend on the top-pairing. Just a huge eraser defensively with his skating and battle.
I wonder if Tom will get the short end of Politics like fellow prospect Hunter Brustewicz. It might not be in Tom's favour that he decided to pass on the SHL and transfer to NCAA in regards to making Team Sweden WJC this month.
Is Hunter Bruzstewicz not?the difference is Tom is a good player.
Is Hunter Bruzstewicz not?
Sucks to suck I guess. That's what he gets for being small?NOP.
He should be number 1 in overall OHL scoring instead of 3rd.
and he should have a 30 points lead on the 2nd place Dman scoring instead of just 10pts.
Sucks to suck I guess. That's what he gets for being small?
If Willander wants to play his role in the top pair, I do believe he needs to gain 15-20 Lbs in the next 2 years. Esp if he's earmarked to play with Quinn Hughes.
I'd take it even further. I think he's played better than both Reinbacher and Simashev.Watched all of Willander's games for BU since Tuch and Hutson are on that team, and he has just been all-around impressive from my viewings.
As a skater he is fast, agile, his edges and balance are really refined too, and Willander is also very sound defensively overall while also being hard to beat physically at the NCAA level.
Willander's ability to break-out the puck either with control or a pass are similarly impressive, as are his puck-management skills and the angles he takes in pursuit of the puck.
Offensively, I was less impressed as Willander pretty much came "as advertised" and isn't an overly creative player by nature (more a simple plays type of guy), doesn't have much more than an average shot, no great dekes, nor does he track to be a primary puck-distributor at the NHL level.
But the one thing he does tremendously well offensively, quite a bit better than I would have expected given what I saw of him last year, is how he supports the play.
Basic, down-to-earth putting yourself in good spots on the ice, offering your teammates passing options while simultaneously also allowing you to cover them if they miss/blow and edge.
And while it's simple to talk about it, it's no easy thing to do. Moreso as a rookie defenseman in a system like the one BU is currently employing, where players like Celebrini and Hutson have the greenlight to take as many chances as they wish to and will permute a LOT position-wise in the offensive zone or in transition.
So yeah, Willander has been really good this year (nevermind what the stat-watchers say), showing some pretty clear signs of progression to my eyes, and Canucks' fans should/will be very happy when he eventually makes it to the show.
I've actually liked his performance better than Reinbacher's this year, though the latter plays in a harder league, on a worse team, and has been injured this season, so there is that.
Anyways, that's it from me. Cheers and have a good evening.
Where was he listed at 6'2, 190? Elite prospects had him at 6'1, 179 which could be out of date. The minimum weight for him to play a defensive role would be 195.He is already 6'2 - 190 lbs
20 lbs? Why does he have to be 210lbs?
Though i dont doubt he will naturally be around 200lbs as his playing weight in the pros, I dont agree that he has to be 210 lbs or more to be a top pairing.
Hronek is killing it with Q Hughes and Willander is already bigger and heavier than Hronek who is 6'0 190 lbs.
others that have excelled with Q Hughes. Chris Tanev 6'2- 190 lbs.
Where was he listed at 6'2, 190? Elite prospects had him at 6'1, 179 which could be out of date. The minimum weight for him to play a defensive role would be 195.
I dont know what his true height and weight is and its pointless to follow, brings me back to some of the posters here arguing Podkolzin is 6'4. but my 20 Lb suggestion is based on his non BU profile. To be able to do everything a successful defensive D should do, 200Lb would be a good bar to set his sights on. If hes already there great.2024-25 Men's Ice Hockey Roster - Boston University Athletics
The official 2024-25 Men's Ice Hockey Roster for the Boston University Terriersgoterriers.com
BU has him listed at 6'1 190lbs which was his measurements at the start of College Season in September. BU coach Pandolfo has said in interviews that Willander has gotten even stronger and bigger since the start of the season which is why the NCAA was a great fit for Tom because they only play on weekends and the rest of the week is focused on strength and skills trainings.
I dont know what his true height and weight is and its pointless to follow, brings me back to some of the posters here arguing Podkolzin is 6'4. but my 20 Lb suggestion is based on his non BU profile. To be able to do everything a successful defensive D should do, 200Lb would be a good bar to set his sights on. If hes already there great.
Appreciate this!Watched all of Willander's games for BU since Tuch and Hutson are on that team, and he has just been all-around impressive from my viewings.
As a skater he is fast, agile, his edges and balance are really refined too, and Willander is also very sound defensively overall while also being hard to beat physically at the NCAA level.
Willander's ability to break-out the puck either with control or a pass are similarly impressive, as are his puck-management skills and the angles he takes in pursuit of the puck.
Offensively, I was less impressed as Willander pretty much came "as advertised" and isn't an overly creative player by nature (more a simple plays type of guy), doesn't have much more than an average shot, no great dekes, nor does he track to be a primary puck-distributor at the NHL level.
But the one thing he does tremendously well offensively, quite a bit better than I would have expected given what I saw of him last year, is how he supports the play.
Basic, down-to-earth putting yourself in good spots on the ice, offering your teammates passing options while simultaneously also allowing you to cover them if they miss/blow and edge.
And while it's simple to talk about it, it's no easy thing to do. Moreso as a rookie defenseman in a system like the one BU is currently employing, where players like Celebrini and Hutson have the greenlight to take as many chances as they wish to and will permute a LOT position-wise in the offensive zone or in transition.
So yeah, Willander has been really good this year (nevermind what the stat-watchers say), showing some pretty clear signs of progression to my eyes, and Canucks' fans should/will be very happy when he eventually makes it to the show.
I've actually liked his performance better than Reinbacher's this year, though the latter plays in a harder league, on a worse team, and has been injured this season, so there is that.
Anyways, that's it from me. Cheers and have a good evening.
Willander is the best defenceman in his class. A forward who turned defenceman less than two years ago and is already elite defensively. Along with his elite skating ability, the potential is sky high with him, has everything you want in a big minute all situations #1 dman.I'd take it even further. I think he's played better than both Reinbacher and Simashev.