You'd think after over 30k posts on a hockey forum you'd know more about the game. You're right. It's not close. Toews is much better right now. At almost all aspects of the game. Analytics, points, etc. Hughes could grow as a player sure, but what are these takes by Canuck fans right now? The proof is right in front of you.
At 524 posts you obviously have a lot still to learn grasshopper.
One player plays on a bad team and has to carry the D and the other plays on an elite team with a great deal more support both offensively and defensively. Any stats that ignore the teams relative strengths and weaknesses are mostly worthless.
For example, Hughes is second on the Canucks in points at 31 points only behind JT Miller. The next closest D is Tyler Myers at 10 points so Hughes has 3 times as many points as the second closest defender.
Makar has more points per game than Toews and Girard is also elite offensively. The Avalanche also have star players in McKinnon, Rantanen and Kadri. The top goal scorer on the Canucks is Horvat who has 13 goals which would place him seventh in goal scoring on the Avalanche despite the fact that the Canucks have played more games.
There is no possible way to compare the offensive stats of the two players and say that Toews are better.
So there you go.