D Matt Schaefer - Erie Otters, OHL (2025 Draft)

Oak

Registered User
Apr 22, 2012
4,201
971
MA
Does anyone have a link to a recent shift by shift video of Schaefer? The one AMS did was good but looking for something newer.
 

Dominance

99-66-4-9-87/97
Sep 30, 2017
7,957
12,634
The Land of Hockey
Looks like we could be heading into an era-defining run for Team Canada future defensive pillars:

2025: Schaefer
2026: Verhoff
2027: Dupont
Hopefully a good portion Byram, Harley, Guhle, Power, Clarke, Zellweger, Korchinski, Mateychuk, Dickinson, Yakemchuk, and Parekh will have asserted themselves as elite options alongside Makar, Dobson, Bouchard by 2029, to give them some competition.
 

MrCreamm

Registered User
Nov 16, 2023
117
156
Since Dahlin I haven’t seen a player cover so much ice and do so many things at that age, incredible player and having another great game tonight. Hits, blocks, sticks in passing lanes, rushes, offense, passing
Yeah he's the first dman since Dahlin whos looked so dynamic and NHL ready, and people forget how much hype Dahlin had in 2018 this might start getting the hype train going.
 

eojsmada

Registered User
Oct 23, 2022
1,121
1,333
Physical Tools and IQ for days.

If Shaefer puts on like 15-20 pounds, he's gonna be a menace in the NHL. Only reason not to draft him over Hagens is if your need for scoring forwards trumps your need for D.
 

Breakfast of Champs

Registered User
Apr 15, 2007
3,105
3,269
I doubt he will go #1. Not necessarily because he isn't worthy or isn't amazing (he is) but just looking at draft history taking a Dman #1 doesn't have the best track record. He's also not as good or dynamic as Dahlin, which is not a knock but Dahlin was just that good.

Especially when there are dynamic forwars avaliable. Again, no knock on him because he's absolutely got #1 D qualities , I just personally don't see a GM taking him 1st OA. I could be wrong though
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
50,269
22,085
MN
I can see GM's liking Schaefer's NHL size over Hagens lack thereof. Schaefer has just about every tool you can want, and also plays a smart game. Hagens seems to have a special sense of the game, though. We'll see who steps up against tough competition, but even then, it's only one tournament.
 

FrankMTL

Registered User
Jan 6, 2005
12,607
14,723
He's an incredible prospect and has no weaknesses in his game. He will be able to play 25-30 minutes a game and be a difference maker at both ends of the ice. If I was a betting man, I think there's an extremely good chance he's going 1st overall at the moment. He's on a completely different level from some of the other defensemen who were taken 1st overall in the last 25 years such as Owen Power, Aaron Ekblad and Erik Johnson. I personally think he can be better than Rasmus Dahlin. This kid just has that "it" factor.
 

Castle8130

Registered User
May 9, 2017
3,062
2,566
Him and Hagens are separating themselves from the pack in this tournament. I think it will be a race between these 2, but Hagens lack of size might give schaefer a slight edge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Konk

emptyNedder

Not seeking rents
Sponsor
Jan 17, 2018
3,915
8,722
Him and Hagens are separating themselves from the pack in this tournament. I think it will be a race between these 2, but Hagens lack of size might give schaefer a slight edge.
Scouts either have a dilemma or can't go wrong if drafting 1st/2nd. I tend to think the latter. Schaefer's size and being 20 months younger would have me lean every so slightly to taking the D.
 

Castle8130

Registered User
May 9, 2017
3,062
2,566
Scouts either have a dilemma or can't go wrong if drafting 1st/2nd. I tend to think the latter. Schaefer's size and being 20 months younger would have me lean every so slightly to taking the D.
Yeah age too. Although Hagens looks like a complete 200 ft center. You can say what you want about his size, but I'm pretty confident he holds down the center position in the NHL. I can't say the same about most other high-end prospects
 
  • Like
Reactions: wetcoast

crazynaiman

Registered User
Jul 2, 2015
15
35
Scouts either have a dilemma or can't go wrong if drafting 1st/2nd. I tend to think the latter. Schaefer's size and being 20 months younger would have me lean every so slightly to taking the D.
I really don't understand this "hype" about Hagens' size. C'mon, he absolutely looks like a future elite first-line center. His size is normal for a modern center. Why on Earth should we be concerned about his physique when we have Jack Hughes and Connor Bedard? And why should we overrate the size factor for a QB defenseman when we have Quinn Hughes and Lane Hutson in the league? I just want to say that Matt and James are both fantastic players who could easily be franchise players for any NHL team. So GMs will simply pick based on what their team needs, whether it's a defender or a center.
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,586
27,529
New York
I really don't understand this "hype" about Hagens' size. C'mon, he absolutely looks like a future elite first-line center. His size is normal for a modern center. Why on Earth should we be concerned about his physique when we have Jack Hughes and Connor Bedard? And why should we overrate the size factor for a QB defenseman when we have Quinn Hughes and Lane Hutson in the league? I just want to say that Matt and James are both fantastic players who could easily be franchise players for any NHL team. So GMs will simply pick based on what their team needs, whether it's a defender or a center.
Worth stating that Celebrini was measured at 5’11 3/4 at the draft combine. Hagens has been listed at 5’11 even (so maybe rounded up or not, no way to know) for BC all season. For all we know, he’ll be as tall or taller than Celebrini at his draft combine.

If he ends up like half an inch taller than he must’ve measured in like August and you can round up his height to 6’0, no one will be questioning his size, as they don’t for Celebrini.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad