11 or 12 days and would’ve been in the same draft as MckennaIncredibly late birthday for this draft as well
Hopefully a good portion Byram, Harley, Guhle, Power, Clarke, Zellweger, Korchinski, Mateychuk, Dickinson, Yakemchuk, and Parekh will have asserted themselves as elite options alongside Makar, Dobson, Bouchard by 2029, to give them some competition.Looks like we could be heading into an era-defining run for Team Canada future defensive pillars:
2025: Schaefer
2026: Verhoff
2027: Dupont
Yeah he's the first dman since Dahlin whos looked so dynamic and NHL ready, and people forget how much hype Dahlin had in 2018 this might start getting the hype train going.Since Dahlin I haven’t seen a player cover so much ice and do so many things at that age, incredible player and having another great game tonight. Hits, blocks, sticks in passing lanes, rushes, offense, passing
Scouts either have a dilemma or can't go wrong if drafting 1st/2nd. I tend to think the latter. Schaefer's size and being 20 months younger would have me lean every so slightly to taking the D.Him and Hagens are separating themselves from the pack in this tournament. I think it will be a race between these 2, but Hagens lack of size might give schaefer a slight edge.
Yeah age too. Although Hagens looks like a complete 200 ft center. You can say what you want about his size, but I'm pretty confident he holds down the center position in the NHL. I can't say the same about most other high-end prospectsScouts either have a dilemma or can't go wrong if drafting 1st/2nd. I tend to think the latter. Schaefer's size and being 20 months younger would have me lean every so slightly to taking the D.
Scouts either have a dilemma or can't go wrong if drafting 1st/2nd. I tend to think the latter. Schaefer's size and being 20 months younger would have me lean every so slightly to taking the D.
I really don't understand this "hype" about Hagens' size. C'mon, he absolutely looks like a future elite first-line center. His size is normal for a modern center. Why on Earth should we be concerned about his physique when we have Jack Hughes and Connor Bedard? And why should we overrate the size factor for a QB defenseman when we have Quinn Hughes and Lane Hutson in the league? I just want to say that Matt and James are both fantastic players who could easily be franchise players for any NHL team. So GMs will simply pick based on what their team needs, whether it's a defender or a center.Scouts either have a dilemma or can't go wrong if drafting 1st/2nd. I tend to think the latter. Schaefer's size and being 20 months younger would have me lean every so slightly to taking the D.
Finger slipped on the keyboard?Scouts either have a dilemma or can't go wrong if drafting 1st/2nd. I tend to think the latter. Schaefer's size and being 20 months younger would have me lean every so slightly to taking the D.
Worth stating that Celebrini was measured at 5’11 3/4 at the draft combine. Hagens has been listed at 5’11 even (so maybe rounded up or not, no way to know) for BC all season. For all we know, he’ll be as tall or taller than Celebrini at his draft combine.I really don't understand this "hype" about Hagens' size. C'mon, he absolutely looks like a future elite first-line center. His size is normal for a modern center. Why on Earth should we be concerned about his physique when we have Jack Hughes and Connor Bedard? And why should we overrate the size factor for a QB defenseman when we have Quinn Hughes and Lane Hutson in the league? I just want to say that Matt and James are both fantastic players who could easily be franchise players for any NHL team. So GMs will simply pick based on what their team needs, whether it's a defender or a center.