CXLIX - FINAL thoughts on the Arizona Coyotes

bleedblue94

Registered User
Jun 8, 2004
9,084
9,507
Something is better than nothing. Benefits should go at least one year. The $1m, probably is already spent.
I detest the something is better than nothing argument. By that stance he could have donated $500.

It's all relative, and the amount he committed compared to what he swindled out of this shit storm is pathetic.

Have those season tickets holders all been fully refunded yet?
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
188,948
40,961
I detest the something is better than nothing argument. By that stance he could have donated $500.

It's all relative, and the amount he committed compared to what he swindled out of this shit storm is pathetic.

Have those season tickets holders all been fully refunded yet?
It would be nice if they had more, obviously, the guy is skipping out no matter what. There’s no saving face. But it’s not $500, it’s $1M. It’s still not as much as he could donate, but I’m sure they’d rather have a million dollars than not since it will be much more difficult to raise money
 

JimAnchower

Registered User
Dec 8, 2012
1,465
265
So..... not exiting a total ass..... but it isn't going to make the pain go away.


Six months of pay and benefits is pretty good. I was part of a re-org late last year and received 60 days of benefits (I was on my wife's health plan, so I didn't really need it) and basically a year of salary based on years of service. It took me six months to find my next role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roadrage

JAK

Non-registered User
Jul 10, 2010
4,605
4,315
I'm more surprised that he didn't just hang on to it and try to sell the right to basically an expansion franchise.
 

cbcwpg

Registered User
May 18, 2010
20,379
21,288
Between the Pipes
Bettman:

“Alex took over a franchise that had a number of challenges that he had nothing to do with creating,” Bettman said. “He invested a lot of himself and a lot of money in trying to turn things around, but I don’t think the stars aligned. And that franchise, well before he took over, had issues relative to an appropriate place to play.

“And so we thank him for everything he tried to do, and we had hoped and wished the situation could’ve been different. But I think the way he had focused on it and decided to put things to rest speaks volumes of the way he handles himself to try and do the right thing.”

“I hope the commentary, and the history, treats Alex fairly,” he said. “I think he deserves it.”

As to where this latest development leaves the future of NHL hockey in Arizona, Bettman was non-committal.

“That’s not something we’re focused on right now,” he said. “I think there are fans there, I think it’s a good market. But somebody, before we can even have this conversation, has to solve the arena problem, and that has been daunting.”

When asked if anyone else in Arizona has expressed interest in taking on that problem and reviving NHL hockey in the state, Bettman said, “No, not to us, and that’s not something we’re interested in pursuing right now.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheLegend

awfulwaffle

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
11,951
1,974
Dallas, TX
He did walk away with quite a bit of money to unload the team to Utah...

But what did he spend on the team trying to keep it in AZ?

Nobody was going to be happy regardless of what he did on his way out. NHL is a business, and quite frankly, without an arena, it wasn't going to stay in AZ. Perhaps he should have signed the 20 year lease with Glendale, and just rode the losses if he was really just interested in owning a hockey team. But, end of the day, it's all in the past. Sad day, but I do feel that hockey will be back in AZ eventually.

The clearest path I see is Ishbia working with the City of Phoenix when the lease comes up, and attempting to either renovate Footprint(again lol), or a new arena that will be able to house both NBA and NHL. That way, there is the option of the NHL coming back to AZ.

Sarver was a jerk, perhaps Ishbia will be more willing to work with a separate owner on sharing revenue etc. If Sarver wasn't in the picture, I imagine things could have gone differently in AZ. But he would block any and every attempt of someone else coming into "his" stadium and taking revenue from them.
 

CHRDANHUTCH

Registered User
Mar 4, 2002
36,893
4,650
Auburn, Maine
But what did he spend on the team trying to keep it in AZ?

Nobody was going to be happy regardless of what he did on his way out. NHL is a business, and quite frankly, without an arena, it wasn't going to stay in AZ. Perhaps he should have signed the 20 year lease with Glendale, and just rode the losses if he was really just interested in owning a hockey team. But, end of the day, it's all in the past. Sad day, but I do feel that hockey will be back in AZ eventually.

The clearest path I see is Ishbia working with the City of Phoenix when the lease comes up, and attempting to either renovate Footprint(again lol), or a new arena that will be able to house both NBA and NHL. That way, there is the option of the NHL coming back to AZ.

Sarver was a jerk, perhaps Ishbia will be more willing to work with a separate owner on sharing revenue etc. If Sarver wasn't in the picture, I imagine things could have gone differently in AZ. But he would block any and every attempt of someone else coming into "his" stadium and taking revenue from them.
the only true solution is competent state government in Arizona.....
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
27,066
10,241
But what did he spend on the team trying to keep it in AZ?

Nobody was going to be happy regardless of what he did on his way out. NHL is a business, and quite frankly, without an arena, it wasn't going to stay in AZ. Perhaps he should have signed the 20 year lease with Glendale, and just rode the losses if he was really just interested in owning a hockey team. But, end of the day, it's all in the past. Sad day, but I do feel that hockey will be back in AZ eventually.

The clearest path I see is Ishbia working with the City of Phoenix when the lease comes up, and attempting to either renovate Footprint(again lol), or a new arena that will be able to house both NBA and NHL. That way, there is the option of the NHL coming back to AZ.

Sarver was a jerk, perhaps Ishbia will be more willing to work with a separate owner on sharing revenue etc. If Sarver wasn't in the picture, I imagine things could have gone differently in AZ. But he would block any and every attempt of someone else coming into "his" stadium and taking revenue from them.
That won’t happen. Right now the suns get everything at footprint. If they shared like the mavs and stars do in Dallas the suns surrender half the revenue they get now for what? He’d need equity in the nhl team.

At this point have to wait a decade til the lease with footprint is closer to being over in 2037.

From a pure business standpoint, I think any other owner would do the same as Sarver if they were in his position of not having the money or interest to purchase the coyotes. Options were to tear down the arena and build a new one for both clubs and they share revenues. Or do a facelift reno vs a structural one and keep all of the revenues for the Suns.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CHRDANHUTCH

PredsHead

Registered User
Nov 14, 2018
549
482
IMO one thing to keep an eye on in the Arizona situation is what happens with ASU's basketball arena. They have to do something soon as their current arena just isn't up to standard anymore. If they either renovate the current or build a new on-campus arena, that would likely make it more difficult to get another new arena built in the area for a NHL team. If they decide to build something off campus in Tempe then I think you could see someone try to partner with them to get an arena built that could also house a NHL team. I know that was talked about at one time and perhaps announced prematurely but I think it could work under the right circumstances. Not sure how you could get a new building built in the area without working with either the Suns or ASU as a partner.
 
Last edited:

Llama19

Registered User
Jan 19, 2013
7,294
1,137
Outside GZ
Bettman:

“Alex took over a franchise that had a number of challenges that he had nothing to do with creating,” Bettman said. “He invested a lot of himself and a lot of money in trying to turn things around, but I don’t think the stars aligned. And that franchise, well before he took over, had issues relative to an appropriate place to play.

“And so we thank him for everything he tried to do, and we had hoped and wished the situation could’ve been different. But I think the way he had focused on it and decided to put things to rest speaks volumes of the way he handles himself to try and do the right thing.”

“I hope the commentary, and the history, treats Alex fairly,” he said. “I think he deserves it.”

As to where this latest development leaves the future of NHL hockey in Arizona, Bettman was non-committal.

“That’s not something we’re focused on right now,” he said. “I think there are fans there, I think it’s a good market. But somebody, before we can even have this conversation, has to solve the arena problem, and that has been daunting.”

When asked if anyone else in Arizona has expressed interest in taking on that problem and reviving NHL hockey in the state, Bettman said, “No, not to us, and that’s not something we’re interested in pursuing right now.”
From what source...link please...are these quoted statements from...
 

cbcwpg

Registered User
May 18, 2010
20,379
21,288
Between the Pipes

Yukon Joe

Registered User
Aug 3, 2011
6,547
4,601
YWG -> YXY -> YEG
Opps.. Future of NHL hockey in Arizona unclear without new arena development

JMO... after listening to Bettman, I don't think the NHL will even answer the phone from anyone in Arizona until AFTER an arena is built and is functioning. This will never be a case of we want a team so we will build an arena...NO, this will be build it first, then maybe we will talk.

I think that's a little strong.

Given the difficulties the Coyotes had the league won't agree to give a team to Arizona just on a vague promise to build an arena. But it could be more like Seattle where granting the expansion team and re-building the arena were contingent on each other.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
27,066
10,241
Opps.. Future of NHL hockey in Arizona unclear without new arena development

JMO... after listening to Bettman, I don't think the NHL will even answer the phone from anyone in Arizona until AFTER an arena is built and is functioning. This will never be a case of we want a team so we will build an arena...NO, this will be build it first, then maybe we will talk.
Arena would have to be approved first. Just like for Minny, Columbus when they got their teams.

Without that, not returning to AZ. Clearly hoping and trying to figure it out while a team is there didn’t work. Either someone truly wants a team there and gets the arena deal done or you don’t return.
 

TheLegend

Hardly Deactivated
Aug 30, 2009
37,445
30,149
Buzzing BoH
Opps.. Future of NHL hockey in Arizona unclear without new arena development

JMO... after listening to Bettman, I don't think the NHL will even answer the phone from anyone in Arizona until AFTER an arena is built and is functioning. This will never be a case of we want a team so we will build an arena...NO, this will be build it first, then maybe we will talk.

Having an arena under construction would be enough get the ball rolling. Because the expansion process itself takes 2-3 years.

Ryan Smith had been at it for two years before flipping from expansion mode to taking a relocation option.
 

FissionFire

Registered User
Dec 22, 2006
12,664
1,245
Las Vegas, NV
www.redwingscentral.com
Everything people said would happen happened.

the league will probably go back to Phoenix last. Maybe try San Diego first.

But Atlanta and Houston have more corporate money, people, and a larger footprint.

Also, Phoenix is the first Sunbelt city to lose a Big 4 team. Not a great look. Diamondbacks are up next...
SoCal is part of the Sun Belt and LA has lost 2 NFL teams in the past (Rams and Raiders). Oakland and San Diego more recently lost their NFL teams. LA didn’t even have an NFL team from 1994-2016.

You can go further back to a team like the Golden Seals if you want an example from the NHL.

SoCal has a long history of failed/losing sports franchises.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad