Ernie
Registered User
- Aug 3, 2004
- 13,101
- 2,766
I'm still patiently waiting for your repsonse to Legend's question.
I didn't see any question
I'm still patiently waiting for your repsonse to Legend's question.
I didn't see any question
Very interesting that it being attacked from both sides of the political spectrum.
It will be interesting to see whether the voters can see through all the financial sleight of hands going on.
Bottom line, this stadium will result in taxes increasing for Tempe residents down the road.
He wanted your thoughts on what you meant by this.
I'd want to see the work using something like this as an example:I'm still patiently waiting for your repsonse to Legend's question.
City is getting $40 million that’s non-refundable to do as they please with once the first shovel of dirt is dug.Same thing as I've said before - the tax abatement means that city services like police, fire etc won't be covered by residents of the new development. So Tempe taxpayers will be on the hook.
I must say, if this actually transpires as you say it will, then that is one helluva deal for the city!City is getting $40 million that’s non-refundable to do as they please with once the first shovel of dirt is dug.
They’re getting 3,000 sq ft. of class A office space for 30 years for free.
They’re getting 1,500 sq ft of space for first responders for free permanently.
They get 5 days use of the arena annually for free permanently for any kind of event.
They’re getting roughly $2 million (off the top of my head) annually in funds for various city programs.
After 8 years the city will get 100% of local property taxes assessed on all buildings outside the arena and music venue.
After 30 years the property taxes will kick in for the remaining parts of TED.
Clearly someone has not read the proposal.
I must say, if this actually transpires as you say it will, then that is one helluva deal for the city!
Who could argue those benefits?
But, let’s wait and see if your list remains intact by the time this is all done.
But that’s a solid deal for sure!
Xavier Gutierrez during an interview at tonight's game with Boston announced they have turned in 6.000+ signatures to the Tempe city clerk to authenticate for the referendum.
They only need 2148 to qualify.
The deal (DDA) is finalized and approved by Tempe city council—subject to approval by Tempe voters.
There is no allowance in the DDA for the Coyotes to renegotiate any of the items Legend listed.
Seems like it’s up to the voters that pay the taxes there to decide whether they want the hockey team or not, no?There probably was no known allowance for the coyotes to renogiate contracts with vendors, not pay SB on time for players and “forget” to pay rent.
But it happened.
I don’t really care either way. Not sure if this will go through or what will happen of course but people have every right to be sceptical about everything the coyotes management has done…….
Seems like a deal that’s too good to be true from a guy who couldn’t pay the hotdog guy 6 months ago
Seems like it’s up to the voters that pay the taxes there to decide whether they want the hockey team or not, no?
There probably was no known allowance for the coyotes to renogiate contracts with vendors, not pay SB on time for players and “forget” to pay rent.
But it happened.
I don’t really care either way. Not sure if this will go through or what will happen of course but people have every right to be sceptical about everything the coyotes management has done…….
Seems like a deal that’s too good to be true from a guy who couldn’t pay the hotdog guy 6 months ago
Most contracts that businessmen default on were established by themselves.There’s also a big difference between taking over contracts and establishing them yourself.
Never implied there’s no risk. There’s always risk.Most contracts that businessmen default on were established by themselves.
Most businesses that declare bankruptcy happen to first transfer resources to sister companies.
Most companies know they have to pay state taxes regardless of where the tax notice was mailed.
To say that Meruelo is no longer a risk and can be trusted cultivates a certain level of naivety.
If the matter is actually going to referendum, it would seem there is no more room to complain about it.
Yes, you can say: "The devil is in the details. It's going to cost Tempe tax revenue in the future." But that argument seems to be more applicable to all development.
I'm beginning to trust Meruelo a little bit. He needs something besides the hockey team to make it work (we all know that, whether we admit it or not- if it weren't for arena revenue and other development associated with hockey arenas, only a few markets would be viable). He seems to want to do that in a way that doesn't demand a lot from the municipality.
Contrast with IA for example, who wanted to fill the gap with 15M/yr from Glendale, or even worse, 24M/yr form Tempe for building in conjunction with ASU.
This is a matter of: The owner actually has enough money to do it right.
Now, we hope that we continues to operate that way.
Do you remember when it was “pay $100 million for parking you already own??”It is weird seeing this deal discussed as if it were the Terrible deals laid at Glendale's feet.
"Pay us 15 million a year for an arena you already own" is a far cry from this pretty well thought out development proposal for a modern arena.
Even if I weren't a hockey fan in Tempe, having a vibrant arena full of concerts, conventions, and other events is a bonus.
You look at winnipeg - if we had a shitty, non-NHL arena, would we be the second city to get an AEW show in Canada?
There’s also a big difference between taking over contracts and establishing them yourself.
Do you remember when it was “pay $100 million for parking you already own??”
I admit I was more naive about that stuff back in the day. Today I would be rolling my eyes out of my sockets.
There probably was no known allowance for the coyotes to renogiate contracts with vendors
You take over a franchise that’s bleeding money. First thing you do is cut costs and if the previous ownership made bad contracts you do what you can to renegotiate or cut them.No there isn’t? At all…..,
You can’t just not pay people because you don’t like the terms that you agreed to. If you don’t want to pay the vendors. Don’t buy the team.
That’s a crazy take
Admittedly, considering AEW's business model, it doesn't really matter what city gets a house show, since it isn't really the core of what AEW and Tony Khan's plan is, but I get what you're saying.You look at winnipeg - if we had a shitty, non-NHL arena, would we be the second city to get an AEW show in Canada?
Very interesting that it being attacked from both sides of the political spectrum.
It will be interesting to see whether the voters can see through all the financial sleight of hands going on.
Bottom line, this stadium will result in taxes increasing for Tempe residents down the road.
And where does it say in the proposal that the arena will increase taxes... City is not putting anything into the building itself. The city is on the hook to clean up the land where TED will be built on. They are STILL going be on the hook to clean up the land even TED doesn't happen and something else happens instead....