CXLI - UPDATE 1/27 - Coyotes working on deal to play at 5,000-seat arena at ASU

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

Spydey629

Registered User
Jan 28, 2005
977
405
Carlisle, PA
Meruelo probably has no problem using the Coyotes as a glorified loss leader since he can make the money the Yotes bleed right back from his sportsbooks in Arizona. The team is a means to an end for him, after all.

That said, 31 other owners might have a say.

Long time lurker on here, myself. But my take is that the Gaming License is the A-1 reason they DON’T move. Selling/relocating the franchise means Muerello surrenders his license to print money.

What sports owner ever gives up his ability to make money hand over fist??
 

Major4Boarding

Unfamiliar Moderator
Jan 30, 2009
5,504
2,526
South of Heaven
3-4 years is a very long patch

Wonder what ASU would want for rent plus they will need to prioritize their own programs too. I guess that rules out Chase Filed if this is true....only possible option is a 5K seat building, similar to the 2nd arena under the IA proposal years back lolz

Most likely less than renovation and monthly routine maintenance costs with AVMC
 

JimAnchower

Registered User
Dec 8, 2012
1,465
265
I think determining factor here is the rink and the video capabilities. When you consider NHL standards for replays and TV, the cost to retro-fit those into any other place likely tipped the scale. The ASU situation requires nothing from the Yotes except signing a lease and working out a schedule. Much easier than all the details in the other possibilities.

They do need to construct their own locker rooms as that is a NCAA rule, apparently. It also limits weekend games, as that's when a lot of smaller college sports compete. Maybe there will be more details later.

Edit to add:

The articles highlights those items.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass

hockeyguy0022

Registered User
Feb 20, 2016
429
220
so 8 or so months to build a 20 million dollar temp facility for locker rooms/offices/workout/meeting etc.. I still don't see it happening. Then bleed money for 4 years with 5K seats...

I think this is more a propaganda piece then anything. I don't see it happening, not to be negative, but 5K and you need to build semi-temp facilities and then lose money for 2-4 years.....

0% chance AM wants to do that.
 

Pandemonia

Registered User
Aug 30, 2020
769
1,322
so 8 or so months to build a 20 million dollar temp facility for locker rooms/offices/workout/meeting etc.. I still don't see it happening. Then bleed money for 4 years with 5K seats...

I think this is more a propaganda piece then anything. I don't see it happening, not to be negative, but 5K and you need to build semi-temp facilities and then lose money for 2-4 years.....

0% chance AM wants to do that.

AM may not want to do it, but this may be the least unpleasant of all his alternatives.

And I think you can amend the "lose money for 2-4 years" to read "lose money for more than 4 years", given the more realistic timelines offered by recent posters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheLegend

TheLegend

Hardly Deactivated
Aug 30, 2009
37,789
30,847
Buzzing BoH
GoPHNX site is back up. Read the article.

Still a LOT of hurdles out there.

Meruelo would need to build his own locker rooms, training facilities, etc. If it's on/near the site then it has to clear the AZ Board of Regents. There could be benefits for ASU in the long term (once Meruelo moves onto his own arena), but that's all speculation.

One thing for sure.... if ASU goes through with this (and Meruelo is willing to spend millions of his own money to get this done) it has to carry some weight with the Tempe City Council.

The timeline though.... yikes.
 

hockeyguy0022

Registered User
Feb 20, 2016
429
220
Some Twitter accounts saying the coyotes talked to the developer if it’s possible… not ASU.

Edit: maybe be old speculation from the first time they tried to collaborate on an arena
 

Yukon Joe

Registered User
Aug 3, 2011
6,773
4,794
YWG -> YXY -> YEG
Interesting. I know there's been a move in recent years to have fewer seats, but 5,000 is pretty damn small.

One thing - it could just be part of negotiating with Glendale. Right now Glendale thinks they have the Yotes over the barrel, but if the Yotes have a viable plan to go play at ASU Glendale might back down and sign a new short-term lease for GRA.
 

hockeyguy0022

Registered User
Feb 20, 2016
429
220
AM may not want to do it, but this may be the least unpleasant of all his alternatives.

And I think you can amend the "lose money for 2-4 years" to read "lose money for more than 4 years", given the more realistic timelines offered by recent posters.

You’re 100% right. If I’m AM I would have tried to temp (city) move somewhere with a 15-20K arena for the X number of years. Then come back and start fresh.
 

hockeyguy0022

Registered User
Feb 20, 2016
429
220
Interesting. I know there's been a move in recent years to have fewer seats, but 5,000 is pretty damn small.

One thing - it could just be part of negotiating with Glendale. Right now Glendale thinks they have the Yotes over the barrel, but if the Yotes have a viable plan to go play at ASU Glendale might back down and sign a new short-term lease for GRA.

i think GRA straight up doesn’t want their business anymore. Like unless Gary himself guarantees the $$$.

I wouldn’t do business with AM for more then any required time. Sounds like he’s a complete bottom feeder
 

Llama19

Registered User
Jan 19, 2013
7,297
1,138
Outside GZ
Interesting. I know there's been a move in recent years to have fewer seats, but 5,000 is pretty damn small.

One thing - it could just be part of negotiating with Glendale. Right now Glendale thinks they have the Yotes over the barrel, but if the Yotes have a viable plan to go play at ASU Glendale might back down and sign a new short-term lease for GRA.

Nope...
 

TheLegend

Hardly Deactivated
Aug 30, 2009
37,789
30,847
Buzzing BoH
AM may not want to do it, but this may be the least unpleasant of all his alternatives.

And I think you can amend the "lose money for 2-4 years" to read "lose money for more than 4 years", given the more realistic timelines offered by recent posters.

The goal is for the long term.

Meruelo is probably quite aware this is going to take some very heavy lifting up front on his part (as in $$$$). That fact he's even making this attempt is something your "bottom feeder" would never do.
 

Yukon Joe

Registered User
Aug 3, 2011
6,773
4,794
YWG -> YXY -> YEG

We'll see.

Glendale's actions so far have been perfectly rational - they don't want to see the Coyotes build a competing arena in the Phoenix area and don't want to be jerked around on a series of one-year leases.

But if the new arena becomes a fait accompli, their calculation might change and they figure it's better to get what rent they can from the 40+ dates the Coyotes would use the arena.

Obviously that's just a guess on my part though.
 

hockeyguy0022

Registered User
Feb 20, 2016
429
220
Also consider ASU is a dry campus..... So the facility does not have beer pipes/taps... So even if they get an exemption for Coyotes, that's still bottles/cans and plastic cups, much like many football games.

I would be shocked if they didn't allow booze, and as that is usually considered a good/great profit center.
 

Llama19

Registered User
Jan 19, 2013
7,297
1,138
Outside GZ
We'll see.

Glendale's actions so far have been perfectly rational - they don't want to see the Coyotes build a competing arena in the Phoenix area and don't want to be jerked around on a series of one-year leases.

But if the new arena becomes a fait accompli, their calculation might change and they figure it's better to get what rent they can from the 40+ dates the Coyotes would use the arena.

Obviously that's just a guess on my part though.

Still nope...
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
23,144
14,912
Merek is mentioning to get the rink up to NHL standards the seating capacity could be closer to 3200. How could the league allow that? Even 5000 is crazy. But 3200! That's ECHL level, isn't it?
 

Yukon Joe

Registered User
Aug 3, 2011
6,773
4,794
YWG -> YXY -> YEG
Still nope...

I've been following the situation in Glendale for, I dunno - 13 years? Maybe more. At first it was because I was desperately hoping the team would move to Winnipeg. I remember staying up late watching Glendale city council meetings online. Since 2011 with it wound up being the Thrashers moving to Winnipeg I no longer have a rooting interest, but can't turn away as it's just been the world's slowest car crash - the kind you can't help but watch.

Anyways, I used to make big pronouncements on what would or would not happen. The only thing I've learned in those 13 years is to never make any firm predictions on what will happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WaveRaven

hockeyguy0022

Registered User
Feb 20, 2016
429
220
I actually think this more of a 6-8 year arrangement. I don't think that Tempe deal will workout and get built as fast as everyone think.

Guys like AM will get the NHL to buy-in on ASU, then take the extra time/years to maximize Tempe local revenue/planning/sales knowing bettman isn't going to do ANYTHING now. Just how those type of guys do business.

I could see the yotes playing at ASU for 10 years to be honest now that I think about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass

TheLegend

Hardly Deactivated
Aug 30, 2009
37,789
30,847
Buzzing BoH
We'll see.

Glendale's actions so far have been perfectly rational - they don't want to see the Coyotes build a competing arena in the Phoenix area and don't want to be jerked around on a series of one-year leases.

But if the new arena becomes a fait accompli, their calculation might change and they figure it's better to get what rent they can from the 40+ dates the Coyotes would use the arena.

Obviously that's just a guess on my part though.


Nyah.... I'm actually agreeing with Llama on this. Glendale is not going to allow them back.

The only way that could have possibly redeemed itself is if Meruelo had been able to buy Westgate and then have Steve Ellman's original business plan.
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
23,144
14,912
Merek now talking about what happens if the new arena deal doesn't get done? Does the club still play at the University rink indefinitely? Is there another backup plan to keep the team in Arizona?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad