Toggle sidebar

Player Discussion Cutter Gauthier

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
Arthuros said:
Hah, I think part of the rub is that they don't feel like they got a premium asset back.
Click to expand...
Yeah, i've noticed Drysdale gets underrated at Flyers board but overrated at Ducks board.
I think its more along the lines of they got a fair asset back and their GM seemed to prefer an NHL player in Drysdale over prospect + pick. With Drysdale's injury concerns the Ducks probably preferred that route too of giving him up over prospect + pick.
 
Arthuros said:
Hah, I think part of the rub is that they don't feel like they got a premium asset back.
Click to expand...

I think Drysdale will still become a good player if he can stay healthy. It's hard to develop (especially as a dman) in the NHL when you can't stay on the ice, and he's played 42 games combined in the last three seasons. He's barely 22 years old.

I will say though, given what Cutter did this year in the NCAA and what his trajectory has been, he has a much better shot at becoming an elite player. It might take him a few years to grow into the "power forward" mold that Verbeek wants, but I think looking back on this trade in five years we're going to be happy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robbieboy3686, Yemeth and lwvs84
As much as this is hated by Flyers fans, and no matter what the future brings, both teams got an asset, and Philly also got a pick.

Looking back at losing Schultz for absolutely nothing, it is tough to have any sympathy for the Flyers. It has never really been discussed, but who knows if we get a timely goal or two during that run from Schultz or if we had gotten an asset.

I’ve never considered Schultz a pivotal piece in ‘16 and ‘17, but he had a couple GWG’s that would have been very helpful in ‘15. Not to mention his offensive upside over Lovejoy through our Boudreau years.

John
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yemeth, TopShelfWaterBottle and ff8
duxfan1101 said:
He really does seem like a good guy off the ice. It makes me wonder what the Flyers did to piss him off so much. For the record, I don’t think Philly not signing him after his freshman season was the ONLY thing that happened. It feels like there is more to it.
Click to expand...
Rumor has it that they promised him to get the ELC done the instant his season ended in College. After they stalled him multiple times and drafted a player with the same position, who was then hyped beyond belief by Brierè and basically put above Gauthier in the depth chart...well, I'd be kinda pissed, too.

Personal opinion, and not a fact: Brierè also comes across as some kind of creep. I would not in the least be shocked to find out they harassed the kid at College and wanted him to do ridiculous tasks, which he refused to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: duckaroosky and Kalv
GermanRocket7 said:
Rumor has it that they promised him to get the ELC done the instant his season ended in College. After they stalled him multiple times and drafted a player with the same position, who was then hyped beyond belief by Brierè and basically put above Gauthier in the depth chart...well, I'd be kinda pissed, too.
Click to expand...

Michkov? RW vs C/LW.

We'd better hope Cutter isn't that sensitive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: All Mighty
duxfan1101 said:
He really does seem like a good guy off the ice. It makes me wonder what the Flyers did to piss him off so much. For the record, I don’t think Philly not signing him after his freshman season was the ONLY thing that happened. It feels like there is more to it.
Click to expand...
I agree. It was mentioned once or twice that his decision not to sign with them was made among himself, his agent, and his family. If it were just about signing an ELC I don't see why the family would have been involved at all. There's something else there.
 
Dr Johnny Fever said:
I agree. It was mentioned once or twice that his decision not to sign with them was made among himself, his agent, and his family. If it were just about signing an ELC I don't see why the family would have been involved at all. There's something else there.
Click to expand...
I mean, his family might be important to him and he may value their opinions on his life choices. The decision not to sign with Philly was a pretty big career decision. Id probably want my family involved in something like that.
 
DavidBL said:
I mean, his family might be important to him and he may value their opinions on his life choices. The decision not to sign with Philly was a pretty big career decision. Id probably want my family involved in something like that.
Click to expand...
If the decision was strictly based on hockey (signing an ELC, where he will play, how he will be developed, etc), then I'd expect him and his agent to decide the correct course of action. Unless your family name is Lindros they really don't need to be involved with those kind of decisions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom