AngelDuck
MacT
- Jun 16, 2012
- 23,329
- 20,223
6th on the team in scoring as an age 20 season 1st year pro.
Pretty impressive
Pretty impressive
“Definitely worked my way back up,” Gauthier said. “I've always been comfortable playing with Leo, and we have a good chemistry off the ice, so it's pretty fun to play with him. I feel like we read each other really well, both similar, really good skaters and crafty.
“And Killer, obviously, with all the experience he has, he just tells us to go skate and he'll find us."
“You never want to play in the bottom six minutes, but I think it was something that was needed for my game,” Gauthier said. “Never kind of seen that perspective before… you have to fight for pucks a little bit more. You gotta be a bit more physical. You gotta set up the ground game instead of making everything look pretty and cute.”
“I’ve always been a volume shooter,” Gauthier said. “I've been able to score every single level shooting from anywhere in the O-zone, especially last year in college. I would score from pretty much about everywhere. At the start of the year, I didn't really change that too much, but now, I'm not gonna score on NHL goalies from the blue (line). Once in a blue moon I might, but just trying to pick my spots better, and if there's a better play to be made, I'm willing to make it.”
“I thought coming into it, it’s the NHL, it is the hardest league in the world. I thought it was gonna be a smooth transition, but it's not always like that,” Gauthier said. “It was a nice wake up call that you gotta put your work boots on and come to work every single day and I got a lot more to prove, and it'll be a fun summer going into the next year.”
“(Gauthier) has a little bit of confidence,” Killorn said. “He's always been a great skater, great shot, but I think his ability to hold onto the puck and make plays is what's really gonna make him a great player. I think he's improved in that sense.”
“What I've learned in my relationship with him is that there's certain parts of the game that the NHL guys do naturally well,” Cronin said, “and you can rely on them as a coach being really good at it. Part of it’s (defensive) zone arrivals. They'll shoulder check, they'll look around, they'll get a sense of what's going on behind them before they make a decision. He wasn't doing any of that, like zero.”
“I was like, what the hell?” Cronin continued with a laugh. “You come down to the D zone and just stare at the puck and he's got attackers right behind him. Just that awareness of what's going on around him, both defensively and offensively was very absent. And I think, as he started to look, he started to slow the game down defensively, and offensively, ironically, it has come later for him.”
"He was just taking pucks and chucking them to the net. But to me, they weren't purposeful shots.” Cronin said, again pointing to the rookie awareness factor. “They were reactionary shots that were tied to his natural DNA, which was I’m a shooter. I'm a shooter, I’m a shooter. Well, you turn on the puck over in the NHL, because if you don't hit the net, it's going out the other side, and they're coming out on a breakout.”
See this is what drove me nuts about the belly aching about him being one dimensional and low IQ. Anyone who actually watched him in BC could tell this was a possibility. Like, he wasn't strictly this otherworldly playmaker but he executed more than a fair share of passes thst left me thinking "okay he's not JUST a shooter"When we got him most of the reports seemed like he was just a pure sniper, but he’s actually a very high IQ passer as well. He makes some great plays.
Remember when these boards were this excited about Comtois?Remember when people were mad about the trade because the Ducks gave up a 2nd rounder?
Could go down as one of the best longterm-outcome trades in Ducks history.
I mean, anyone who watched the Ducks that year should have seen there was a large chance for regression for Max. He scored like 90% of his goals within 5 feet of the net and most as rebounds.Remember when these boards were this excited about Comtois?
Easy to play revisionist history.
That said, I feel better about Cutter hitting than I ever did about Max. Could top out as a 30 goal scorer, but that's probably his ceiling.
You can't still be talking about Max so...uh. Lol? Cutter could finish his rookie season with 20 goals on one of the most offensively inept teams in the league and after a long adjustment period and you think his ceiling is 30 goals...because?Remember when these boards were this excited about Comtois?
Easy to play revisionist history.
That said, I feel better about Cutter hitting than I ever did about Max. Could top out as a 30 goal scorer, but that's probably his ceiling.
I’m guessing you mean that’s his floor. No chance in hell 30 is his ceiling.Remember when these boards were this excited about Comtois?
Easy to play revisionist history.
That said, I feel better about Cutter hitting than I ever did about Max. Could top out as a 30 goal scorer, but that's probably his ceiling.
Very, very few voiced any skepticism regarding Comtois coming out of his career year. Nearly everyone on these boards penned him into the top 6 long term.I mean, anyone who watched the Ducks that year should have seen there was a large chance for regression for Max. He scored like 90% of his goals within 5 feet of the net and most as rebounds.
Cutter has not been that way at all.
Yeah, Comtois shot 17% on 94 shots and he just wasn't that good of a shooter. There was some decent puck luck in there.I mean, anyone who watched the Ducks that year should have seen there was a large chance for regression for Max. He scored like 90% of his goals within 5 feet of the net and most as rebounds.
Cutter has not been that way at all.
Well, I think both were possible at the same time. He was only 22 and in his D+4. I expected him to get better but also for his shooting % to regress form the 17% it was that year. Both would have balanced out to a 25 goal 50ish point player.Very, very few voiced any skepticism regarding Comtois coming out of his career year. Nearly everyone on these boards penned him into the top 6 long term.
I personally never saw it with him, but I'm not blaming anyone for getting excited at the time. Just pointing out the parallels between Max then, and now with Cutter.
But again, I recognize there's more of a sustainability factor with Cutter.
HF seems to overrate/overstate the value of draft picks like crazy.Remember when people were mad about the trade because the Ducks gave up a 2nd rounder?
Could go down as one of the best longterm-outcome trades in Ducks history.
Honestly twitter and Reddit were the places I really saw the overreaction.HF seems to overrate/overstate the value of draft picks like crazy.
I don't use Twitter, just this place and Reddit. Never really saw overreaction but the fact that people care about a second at all when trading for a high end piece like Cutter... I mean, who cares.Honestly twitter and Reddit were the places I really saw the overreaction.
I think it was much more because Drysdale was viewed very highly rather than us undervaluing Gauthier.I don't use Twitter, just this place and Reddit. Never really saw overreaction but the fact that people care about a second at all when trading for a high end piece like Cutter... I mean, who cares.