It begins. Excellent news.
Also:
Glencross has complained that he isn't being utilized correctly. Isn't that giving a **** message to the team as well?
Or we draft another Markus Granlund, Pat Seiloff or Tyler Wotherspoon.
FFF mentioned above that Glencross complaining sends an equally ****** message to the team. If Glencross is unhappy and letting it be known, trade him.
EDIT:
I agree. Picking up a younger guy who can play defense would be great too.
the source saying Glencross has complained is whom?
I would take such reports with a big grain of salt.
AF I think you may be over-estimating Glencross' impact on the team. We've seen the team play this season with and without Glencross, and they've seemed to be as good if not better. The only risk is the chemistry in the room, but I have to feel that this room runs through Google, Huds and Russell these days much more than Glencross, and if that wasn't the case then I'm sure we would've seen an extension by now.
Realistically, I think this is a situation which is fully in our favour. I don't think he has much value to us right now, but other teams may see him as valuable to them. It seems to me that we might be looking at getting a return without really taking any step back in the short term. I'm excited.
the source saying Glencross has complained is whom?
I would take such reports with a big grain of salt.
A rebuilding franchise should not be losing players for nothing.
Cammalleri walked and the Flames can not lose more veteran players who can possibly bring back assets.
How do you guys feel about some of these deals?
Glencross to Ana for Stefan Noesen/ Nick Sorenson + 2nd
Glencross + 6th to Bos for Jordan Caron + Matt Bartkowski + 2nd
Glencross to MTL for Emelin + Nygren + 3rd OR Nygren + 2nd + 5th
Glencross to NYI for Scott Mayfield/ Sebastian Collberg + 3rd OR Jesse Graham + 2nd
Glencross to NYR for John Moore + 2nd
Glencross to Pit for Dumoulin + 3rd (2nd if pens make SCF)
I like the Pittsburgh one the best.
How about a trade with the Lightning? Connolly + TBL's 3rd.
exactly thisTwo things.
1. The coaching staff has seen fit to plant an "A" on his chest. He's an important part of the leadership group of this team.
B. The same reasons that other teams want him, are the same reasons we should keep him. Playoff / playoff run depth.
Sure he's finally performing at expected levels (ie: not over performing like the past few years) and that's been disappointing to many, but he's still got an important role on this team that won't be easily replaced if he's traded.
Put me squarely into the "only trade him if you get a deal you can't say no to" camp.
How do you guys feel about some of these deals?
Glencross to Ana for Stefan Noesen/ Nick Sorenson + 2nd
Glencross + 6th to Bos for Jordan Caron + Matt Bartkowski + 2nd
Glencross to MTL for Emelin + Nygren + 3rd OR Nygren + 2nd + 5th
Glencross to NYI for Scott Mayfield/ Sebastian Collberg + 3rd OR Jesse Graham + 2nd
Glencross to NYR for John Moore + 2nd
Glencross to Pit for Dumoulin + 3rd (2nd if pens make SCF)
I don't think I am overestimating things at all. Losing a leader can have a big negative impact on the room. I don't want to screw with that chemistry because it is our chemistry that has us where we are.AF I think you may be over-estimating Glencross' impact on the team. We've seen the team play this season with and without Glencross, and they've seemed to be as good if not better. The only risk is the chemistry in the room, but I have to feel that this room runs through Gio, Huds and Russell these days much more than Glencross, and if that wasn't the case then I'm sure we would've seen an extension by now.
Realistically, I think this is a situation which is fully in our favour. I don't think he has much value to us right now, but other teams may see him as valuable to them. It seems to me that we might be looking at getting a return without really taking any step back in the short term. I'm excited.
Is it still a rumor if he has said it himself?